[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
September 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network

CA-Gov: Brown's Canoe Theory is DLC Triangulation

by: Brian Leubitz

Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 15:30:00 PM PST


John Wildermuth thinks Jerry Brown's pretty much got the nomination wrapped up, and you can't blame him for that.  So, he points to all of the random crap that much of the left won't mind so much, but will scare the bejeezus out of the conservative base. Sure, nobody will be that surprised to hear the name Rose Bird, but I kind of doubt it will be determinative in either the primary or general election.

But what I find most striking about the column isn't the "bulls-eye" stuff, it is a reminder of Brown's "Canoe Theory."

For years, Brown's "canoe theory" of government has worked in California: "You paddle a little bit on the left, then you paddle a little bit on the right and you keep going straight down the middle." He's far from the only politician who's tried to play to both ends of the political spectrum, but he's one of the very few who has done it successfully over such a long career.

The crusading candidate for secretary of state in 1970 was very different from the pro-development, law-and-order Oakland mayoral hopeful of 1998, but both versions had something in common: they won. (Fox&Hounds-John Wildermuth)

I'm not going to judge here, I'm simply going to point this out. This is essentially the Joe Lieberman/Democratic Leadership Council triangulation theory. Nothing new here, or at least nothing that Jerry Brown's nemesis, Bill Clinton, didn't talk about endlessly in the late 80s and early 90s.

It's one of the funny things about all of the "Governor Moonbeam" stuff. While he did play in some interesting spiritual realms in the 80s, politically he has pretty much been a creature of his times, sticking close to the conventional wisdom. See Proposition 13 for that.

But, when it comes down to it, Brown is a general election candidate, and knows how to close them out.  With Newsom out, he's got a road to the old gig paved and decked out with a red carpet. Whether the red carpet remains clean is up to some other Democrats.

Brian Leubitz :: CA-Gov: Brown's Canoe Theory is DLC Triangulation
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
otoh (2.00 / 1)
The story about the canoe isn't about how to avoid being progressive; it's about how to be as progressive as possible, without spinning out and crashing into the shore, bringing progress to an end.  

um, nope (5.00 / 1)
your analogy only works if going left = crashing onto the shore. it's centrist pablum, and you should be honest about what you mean by "progressive" if you buy into it. the middle has catastrophically failed california.

surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat

[ Parent ]
You have to be elected to accomplish progressive goals. (0.00 / 0)
There's going left, and then there's going far left -- and the latter is when the electoral canoe crashes onto the shore.  I am more interested in supporting a relative progressive who can win a general election, and who will then be able to implement some sustainable changes, even if he or she does not go as far as I would like to see in an ideal world, than I am in supporting an ideologically pure leftist who will be crushed at the polls and accomplish zero long-term change.

The name of the game is supporting the most progressive viable candidate.  As of today, that's Brown.  If a candidate enters the race who is more progressive than Brown, and who is viable to win statewide in 2010, then I'm all ears.


[ Parent ]
put up or shut up: let's talk specifics (4.00 / 1)
what is "progressive" to you? what is "far-left"? what's your metric for viability?

surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat

[ Parent ]
Okay. (2.00 / 1)
Progressive, in California today, means supporting education, environment, labor, equal rights, graduated taxation, constitutional reform of the 2/3 rules, and many other things.  

Far left, in California today, means social and economic policies that only have fringe support, such as mass release of prisoners, elimination of border controls, legalization of all drugs.

Viability means having a realistic opportunity to be elected.  Not a certainty of winning, but a strong chance.  How is that determined?  By comparing the candidates' education, experience, prior successes, ability to run a complex campaign, ability to raise funds, etc.


[ Parent ]
By Your Own Metric... (5.00 / 1)
Brown is NOT a progressive.  So, let's keep shopping instead of (in the words of the late, lamented Leo McGarry) "settling for the lesser of who gives a crap?"

[ Parent ]
Let's elect a Democratic governor in 2010. (0.00 / 0)
If a more progressive viable candidate gets into the race, great.  If not, there are nevertheless sharp differences between Brown and any of the Republicans now running.  Brown has a long track record in social justice issues, including diversity in judicial appointments; supports same-sex marriage; and was endorsed in 2006 by Sierra Club, CLCV, Vote the Coast, and the Cal Labor Fed.  In the last Field Poll he had a 44-29 favorable rating statewide (57-18 among Democrats; 44-26 among independents).  Brown has 65 years experience in California politics (he was five when his father was elected district attorney of San Francisco).  And he's won four previous statewide elections -- most recently with 56% of the vote.

[ Parent ]
Here's the issue (0.00 / 0)
Brown is going to have his hands full with either Whitman or Poizner. By next summer they'll have caught up in name recognition, and their base will probably be more mobilized thanks to a competitive primary that saw two candidates actively court that base.

On our side, we'll have the presumed frontrunner coasting into the general election without having done much to excite the progressive base. It's a setup for another close New Jersey-style race, and if Brown can't get at least a big chunk of the 2008 Obama electorate to come out for him, it will be a much closer election.

65 years of experience in politics doesn't mean squat if you aren't able to adapt to changing trends and changing conditions. A contested primary will give Brown a chance to do so - but a cakewalk won't.

Brown's statewide record isn't perfect - he lost the 1982 US Senate race to Pete Wilson when voters had tired of 8 years of Brown's vacillations.

The New Jersey and Virginia races make it clear: if Brown can't generate enthusiasm from the progressive electorate, he's not a sure winner. And so far I see nothing to indicate he can generate that enthusiasm.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
No one is a sure winner, but Brown's chances look good. (0.00 / 0)
If a 57-18 favorable rating among Democrats (Field Poll, 10/8/09) doesn't persuade you that Brown is popular in the party, there's not much I can say.

Primaries can build support, though that's hardly guaranteed.  On the downside, a primary would squander millions of dollars that could be spent against the Republican in the general.  And if the primary campaign turned divisive, it could leave supporters of the losing candidate(s) embittered toward the nominee, as we have all seen happen.  Ben Tolchin argues this point of view in a new post at California Majority Report.

Yes, Brown lost one of his five statewide races -- in 1982.  Things were rather different then.  Ronald Reagan was president, and California was in the middle of voting Republican in six consecutive presidential elections (1968 to 1988).  Now, Barack Obama is president, and California has voted Democratic in the last five presidential elections (since 1992).

I do think Brown's experiences from the 1970s make him too worried about conservative backlash at the polls.  The electorate is far more progressive than when he ran for governor in 1974 and 1978, and would sustain a far more progressive platform than the one he's mapped out so far.  I'd really like to see him step forward on reforming the state constitution, for instance.  Fortunately, there's reason to think he's capable of that.  You don't bat .800 in statewide races without "adapting to changing trends and changing conditions."


[ Parent ]
Tulchin, not Tolchin -- sorry, typo. n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
We Obviously Differ (0.00 / 0)
The AG's race was the first time Brown ran for statewide office in 24 years, and he ran against second-, even third-tier candidates in both the primary and the general.  And yet the best he could muster was 56%???

Brown has NOT adapted; he is still running scared on Prop 13, and opposes meaningful progressive reform on a whole host of issues.  Having a 57% favorable among fellow Dems is hardly a mark of popularity.  Maybe if that was the overall population, I might be marginally impressed, but that's rather low for a sitting office-holder among fellow partisans.


[ Parent ]
Indeed, we differ. (0.00 / 0)
Brown's 56.3% victory for attorney general was the highest percentage for any statewide candidate in 2006, higher than Arnold's 55.9%, higher than Lockyer's 54.4%, and much higher than Garamendi (49.2%), Bowen (48.1%), Chiang (50.7%) and Poizner (50.9%).

And Brown's 57-18 favorable/unfavorable among Dems places him in the highest tier of statewide figures, along with Feinstein (68-22) and Boxer (69-18), as well as light years ahead of Whitman, Poizner, and Campbell.


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox