[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

George Runner Files Voter ID Initiative

by: Brian Leubitz

Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 07:00:00 AM PST


Well, it seems George Runner is branching out from just costing the state extra money in our prison system to costing our state money in our elections.  He recently filed what he has dubbed "VoteSAFE: Secure and Fair Elections Act" or as I like to call it, The VoteMORON: Mostly Obnoxious Runner Obfuscation and Negation Act. (I must admit I worked way too hard on that.)

It's a fairly standard attack on two sets of generally progressive voters. First, it requires ID for all voters at the polls, and then requires that people who vote by mail include the last four digits of their driver's license, California ID card, or social security number. And then the municipality has to go through and check everybody.  Oh, and of course the ID can't be more than 2 years expired.

So instead of making it easier for the elderly and new citizens to vote, Runner wants to make it harder and more cumbersome.  Oh, and more expensive for localities performing the elections. Yup, sounds like some Good George Runner policy there.

But wait, if you act now, you can toss in a dig at convicted felons!  Under existing California law, people who have been convicted of a felony get the right to vote back after they have completed parole.  Under Runner's MORON Act, felons would lose their right to vote forever.  This is pretty much the opposite direction as other states are heading.  We should be rewarding convicted felons for completing probation and returning into society, not continuing to punish them.

But that's George Runner, the man never met a chance to shove his boot into the face of anybody who has made a mistake. We'll see if he has the resources to actually get this on the ballot, but if you see any signature gatherers on the street with this stinker in a few weeks, Just Say No to VoteMORON!

Brian Leubitz :: George Runner Files Voter ID Initiative
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Unbelievable (0.00 / 0)
I find it unbelievable that the GOP would back this up.  We don't have too much experience with voter disenfranchisement.  But I don't think they will enjoy the experience.

Why is that unbelievable? (0.00 / 0)
The movement conservative line on voting has been about suppression, and keeping the "wrong people" from voting for decades now (Rehnquist and Operation Eagle Eye, for example).  And California Republicans are straight-up movement conservatives.

[ Parent ]
Unbelievable is the wrong word (0.00 / 0)
What I meant to say is that I don't want to believe that their are large numbers of people this evil.  It is not UNbelievable.  But it just seems so wrong on it's face that I can't imagine they see an upside to doing this.

[ Parent ]
Bad, bad, BAD idea (4.00 / 1)
As a philosophical matter, I oppose mandating ID cards.  It reminds me too much of the passbooks & "papers" demanded by totalitarian regimes.  Yes, I realize that our driver's license serves as a de facto ID card, but it IS possible (barely) for somebody to avoid carrying government-issued identification.

Then there is the practical matter that this amounts to voter suppression, aimed at likely Dems.  That's enough reason to oppose this.


I wonder ... (0.00 / 0)
Can this thing be trumped by Federal law in cases where Federal elections are involved?  Or must it remain in the exclusive domain of the states?

SCOTUS says (0.00 / 0)
all of these things are legal.  So, no.

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox