{"id":10022,"date":"2009-09-08T20:59:38","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T20:59:38","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-09-08T20:59:38","modified_gmt":"2009-09-08T20:59:38","slug":"who-needs-a-failing-local-media-when-you-can-have-a-failing-national-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/09\/08\/who-needs-a-failing-local-media-when-you-can-have-a-failing-national-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Needs a Failing Local Media When You Can Have a Failing National Media?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Times is struggling. They had a war with the Boston Globe&#8217;s reporters and are hemorrhaging cash. &nbsp;They have no really innovative new revenue model to boost their finances either. &nbsp;However, they think they might be on to something: San Francisco!<\/p>\n<p>Yes, both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal are planning &#8220;San Francisco editions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> Both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times are planning to introduce San Francisco Bay Area editions, hoping to win new readers and advertisers there by offering more local news, in what could be the first glimpse at a new strategy by national newspapers to capitalize on the contraction of regional papers.<br \/>\n<br \/>*** *** ***<br \/>\n<br \/>The Journal expects to start its San Francisco edition in November or December, adding a page or two of general-interest news from California, probably once a week, produced by the large staff it already has in the Bay Area. This is different from previous efforts by The Journal to publish regional editions, which had focused on local business news. The paper, based in New York, is also looking into creating a New York edition, with emphasis on adding coverage of the arts, but that plan is not as fully developed. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/09\/05\/business\/media\/05journal.html?_r=3&#038;scp=1&#038;sq=san%20francisco%20edition&#038;st=cse\">NY Times 9\/4\/09<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>San Francisco, and the Bay Area in general, have a relatively transient population. In SF in particular, you have a much higher percentage of people from outside the area with less loyalty to the local paper. I suppose this was somewhat inevitable. <\/p>\n<p>So, who is looking forward to the re-creation of the New York newspaper rivalries on the West Coast? At this point all local coverage can&#8217;t be dismissed as it is so sorely lacking now. However, I&#8217;m not sure that having the national papers parachute in is really the best solution. A page or two a week isn&#8217;t really enough to address the myriad of crises (and the occasional good news) that we are dealing with out here. &nbsp;And if these editions push the Chronicle and the other papers here further towards the grave, it is likely the net result of this coverage will be less local reportage.<\/p>\n<p>The newspaper industry doesn&#8217;t really need more consolidation or more vulturing of each other&#8217;s business. It needs a connection with the community that will restore trust in local media establishments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Times is struggling. They had a war with the Boston Globe&#8217;s reporters and are hemorrhaging cash. &nbsp;They have no really innovative new revenue model to boost their finances either. &nbsp;However, they think they might be on to something: San Francisco!<\/p>\n<p>Yes, both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal are planning &#8220;San Francisco editions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> Both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times are planning to introduce San Francisco Bay Area editions, hoping to win new readers and advertisers there by offering more local news, in what could be the first glimpse at a new strategy by national newspapers to capitalize on the contraction of regional papers.<br \/>\n<br \/>*** *** ***<br \/>\n<br \/>The Journal expects to start its San Francisco edition in November or December, adding a page or two of general-interest news from California, probably once a week, produced by the large staff it already has in the Bay Area. This is different from previous efforts by The Journal to publish regional editions, which had focused on local business news. The paper, based in New York, is also looking into creating a New York edition, with emphasis on adding coverage of the arts, but that plan is not as fully developed. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/09\/05\/business\/media\/05journal.html?_r=3&#038;scp=1&#038;sq=san%20francisco%20edition&#038;st=cse\">NY Times 9\/4\/09<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>San Francisco, and the Bay Area in general, have a relatively transient population. In SF in particular, you have a much higher percentage of people from outside the area with less loyalty to the local paper. I suppose this was somewhat inevitable. <\/p>\n<p>So, who is looking forward to the re-creation of the New York newspaper rivalries on the West Coast? At this point all local coverage can&#8217;t be dismissed as it is so sorely lacking now. However, I&#8217;m not sure that having the national papers parachute in is really the best solution. A page or two a week isn&#8217;t really enough to address the myriad of crises (and the occasional good news) that we are dealing with out here. &nbsp;And if these editions push the Chronicle and the other papers here further towards the grave, it is likely the net result of this coverage will be less local reportage.<\/p>\n<p>The newspaper industry doesn&#8217;t really need more consolidation or more vulturing of each other&#8217;s business. It needs a connection with the community that will restore trust in local media establishments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[69],"tags":[1961,995,7732],"class_list":["post-10022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-69","tag-1961","tag-995","tag-7732"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2BE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}