Links:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Well, well, this is interesting to see some whispers making into the press: Carla Marinucci asks<\/a> Rep. Jane Harman about whether she’s looking at the governor’s race. She gets a non-denial denial. Something to keep an eye on.<\/p>\n \u2022 First Lady Maria Shriver apologized for once again violating the cell phone law<\/a>. Apology, schmapology, we need the $100 worth of fines!<\/p>\n \u2022 Tom Campbell is usually pretty wonky, and usually gets the facts straight, even if he comes to different conclusions than most progressives. However, today, he just stank it up<\/a>. He not only gets the name of the state’s domestic partnership<\/b> program wrong (calling it civil union), but also misunderstanding that out of state marriages are essentially domestic partnerships under SB 54.<\/p>\n \u2022 CalPERS had a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Year<\/a>. It lost 23.4%. Ouch!<\/p>\n \u2022 John Garamendi attacked the wrong David Harmer<\/a> in a mailer. He attributed a quote to Harmer that was in fact a different David Harmer. I don’t really understand the whole going negative thing, but sheesh, at least get it right. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Links:<\/p>\n \u2022 Well, well, this is interesting to see some whispers making into the press: Carla Marinucci asks<\/a> Rep. Jane Harman about whether she’s looking at the governor’s race. She gets a non-denial denial. Something to keep an eye on.<\/p>\n \u2022 First Lady Maria Shriver apologized for once again violating the cell phone law<\/a>. Apology, schmapology, we need the $100 worth of fines!<\/p>\n \u2022 Tom Campbell is usually pretty wonky, and usually gets the facts straight, even if he comes to different conclusions than most progressives. However, today, he just stank it up<\/a>. He not only gets the name of the state’s domestic partnership<\/b> program wrong (calling it civil union), but also misunderstanding that out of state marriages are essentially domestic partnerships under SB 54.<\/p>\n \u2022 CalPERS had a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Year<\/a>. It lost 23.4%. Ouch!<\/p>\n