{"id":10558,"date":"2009-11-22T19:23:47","date_gmt":"2009-11-22T19:23:47","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-11-22T19:23:47","modified_gmt":"2009-11-22T19:23:47","slug":"desperation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/11\/22\/desperation\/","title":{"rendered":"Desperation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over on her budget blog, Asseembly Budget Chair Noreen Evans <a href=\"http:\/\/californiabudget.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/lao-real-budget-pain-to-endure.html\">talks about the upcoming mess of a budget season<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I was reminded of an old saying in politics while reading the new report released this week by the Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office (LAO): &#8220;a billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you&#8217;re talking real money.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Over the next 18 months we face a $20.7 billion gap in the state&#8217;s General Fund: $6.3 billion in the current budget year and a $14.4 billion gap in 2010-2011. A $21.3 billion out-year budget gap follows in 2011-2012.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Robert made a persuasive argument that the Democrats in both Sacramento and DC should simply <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/10517\/no-cuts-by-Robert-Cruickshank\">band together to say &#8220;No Cuts<\/a>.&#8221; That would be the optimal solution. Yet, as Robert also pointed out, even Democrats, save for Party Chair John Burton, are pretty much acknowledging that there will be cuts. &nbsp;At this point, it looks like Asm. Evans&#8217; biggest hope is that at least this time there will be transparency:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Furthermore, the public is just now beginning to see the results of the cuts we made last summer-classrooms are larger, state colleges are getting more expensive, DMV offices are closing, state parks are closing, and courthouses are closed one day a month, already resulting in a severe backlog of cases. The public must be asked to weigh in on how much more it will tolerate.<\/p>\n<p>Since the budget pains will be here to stay for a while, the budget decisions ahead of us must be made out in the open with significant public input. And, every solution available to us must be on the table.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That much is true. We need more transparency, and <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/10034\/transparency-in-california-government-ha\">I&#8217;ve written about that, very serious, problem in the past<\/a>. &nbsp;But, as I did then, I will include the comment that the lack of transparency is a symptom of the problem, not the cure nor the underlying illness.<\/p>\n<p>But how about we flip the script a bit from how this normally works? Normally, you get a very persistent Republican winger bloc to say no new taxes. &nbsp;How about we get a progressive bloc to say, at the very least, no budget deal without new revenue. We can&#8217;t simply continue to give ground at every opportunity to those who would happily sacrifice our social safety net. Ideally, yes, we would say &#8220;No Cuts.&#8221; But until we get the gumption for more than just Sandre Swanson to oppose the budget deal on progressive grounds, we are going to get rolled every time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over on her budget blog, Asseembly Budget Chair Noreen Evans <a href=\"http:\/\/californiabudget.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/lao-real-budget-pain-to-endure.html\">talks about the upcoming mess of a budget season<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I was reminded of an old saying in politics while reading the new report released this week by the Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office (LAO): &#8220;a billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you&#8217;re talking real money.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Over the next 18 months we face a $20.7 billion gap in the state&#8217;s General Fund: $6.3 billion in the current budget year and a $14.4 billion gap in 2010-2011. A $21.3 billion out-year budget gap follows in 2011-2012.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Robert made a persuasive argument that the Democrats in both Sacramento and DC should simply <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/10517\/no-cuts-by-Robert-Cruickshank\">band together to say &#8220;No Cuts<\/a>.&#8221; That would be the optimal solution. Yet, as Robert also pointed out, even Democrats, save for Party Chair John Burton, are pretty much acknowledging that there will be cuts. &nbsp;At this point, it looks like Asm. Evans&#8217; biggest hope is that at least this time there will be transparency:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Furthermore, the public is just now beginning to see the results of the cuts we made last summer-classrooms are larger, state colleges are getting more expensive, DMV offices are closing, state parks are closing, and courthouses are closed one day a month, already resulting in a severe backlog of cases. The public must be asked to weigh in on how much more it will tolerate.<\/p>\n<p>Since the budget pains will be here to stay for a while, the budget decisions ahead of us must be made out in the open with significant public input. And, every solution available to us must be on the table.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That much is true. We need more transparency, and <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/10034\/transparency-in-california-government-ha\">I&#8217;ve written about that, very serious, problem in the past<\/a>. &nbsp;But, as I did then, I will include the comment that the lack of transparency is a symptom of the problem, not the cure nor the underlying illness.<\/p>\n<p>But how about we flip the script a bit from how this normally works? Normally, you get a very persistent Republican winger bloc to say no new taxes. &nbsp;How about we get a progressive bloc to say, at the very least, no budget deal without new revenue. We can&#8217;t simply continue to give ground at every opportunity to those who would happily sacrifice our social safety net. Ideally, yes, we would say &#8220;No Cuts.&#8221; But until we get the gumption for more than just Sandre Swanson to oppose the budget deal on progressive grounds, we are going to get rolled every time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[117],"tags":[7309],"class_list":["post-10558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-7309"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2Ki","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}