{"id":10967,"date":"2010-01-21T22:18:10","date_gmt":"2010-01-21T22:18:10","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-01-21T22:18:10","modified_gmt":"2010-01-21T22:18:10","slug":"just-how-much-will-mercury-insurances-little-ploy-cost-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/01\/21\/just-how-much-will-mercury-insurances-little-ploy-cost-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Just How Much Will Mercury Insurance&#8217;s Little Ploy Cost Us?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It seems to be the day for me to complain about ballot measures. Hey, there&#8217;s worse things to complain about, right? &nbsp;Well, anyway, Prop 103, passed waaaay back in 1988, amongst other insurance reforms, barred insurance companies from doing big surcharges for customers that weren&#8217;t previously insured. &nbsp;There&#8217;s good reasons to stop paying for auto insurance, like, say you didn&#8217;t have a car and were using public transportation, or that you were out of the country, such as deployed soldiers. These are all good, compelling reasons not to have insurance. &nbsp;After all, it is a good thing when people don&#8217;t have cars, right? Isn&#8217;t that the point of services like ZipCar and City Car Share?<\/p>\n<p>But, Mercury Insurance was finding that a bit inconvenint, so they&#8217;re doing they&#8217;re best to overturn it. Of course, that is their right given our rather decrepit governmental structure, but Mercury has to understand that they&#8217;ll also be called out for it. Consumer Watchdog, the successor organization to the folks that passed 103, are still taking it to Mercury.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Mercury Insurance&#8217;s whopping surcharges to motorists who&#8217;ve had a lapse in their coverage in other states is &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; proof that Californian motorists will face the same hit to their wallets if voters approve a ballot measure underwritten by Mercury, a consumer advocate charged Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>In a video demonstration using Mercury&#8217;s Web site, www.MercuryInsurance.com, which offers insurance quotes, Harvey Rosenfield, the founder of Consumer Watchdog, showed that a typical middle aged man with a modest car in Nevada would be charged $835 for six months if he answered yes to the question of whether he currently had coverage. If that same motorist answered no, the six-month premium was quoted as $1,448 &#8212; a 73 percent markup, or surcharge. In California, that is illegal.<\/p>\n<p>Similar or higher surcharges by Mercury have been found in Texas (67 percent) and Florida (227 percent), said Rosenfield, the author of Proposition 103, the 1988 voter-approved law that prohibits insurance companies from raising rates based on previous coverage.(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.contracostatimes.com\/politics-government\/ci_14232081\">CoCo Times 1\/21\/2010<\/a>) <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sure, Mercury will tell you now that they&#8217;ll just give discounts, but the data from other states bears out what really happens. This could end up being quite an expensive little measure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It seems to be the day for me to complain about ballot measures. Hey, there&#8217;s worse things to complain about, right? &nbsp;Well, anyway, Prop 103, passed waaaay back in 1988, amongst other insurance reforms, barred insurance companies from doing big surcharges for customers that weren&#8217;t previously insured. &nbsp;There&#8217;s good reasons to stop paying for auto insurance, like, say you didn&#8217;t have a car and were using public transportation, or that you were out of the country, such as deployed soldiers. These are all good, compelling reasons not to have insurance. &nbsp;After all, it is a good thing when people don&#8217;t have cars, right? Isn&#8217;t that the point of services like ZipCar and City Car Share?<\/p>\n<p>But, Mercury Insurance was finding that a bit inconvenint, so they&#8217;re doing they&#8217;re best to overturn it. Of course, that is their right given our rather decrepit governmental structure, but Mercury has to understand that they&#8217;ll also be called out for it. Consumer Watchdog, the successor organization to the folks that passed 103, are still taking it to Mercury.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Mercury Insurance&#8217;s whopping surcharges to motorists who&#8217;ve had a lapse in their coverage in other states is &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; proof that Californian motorists will face the same hit to their wallets if voters approve a ballot measure underwritten by Mercury, a consumer advocate charged Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>In a video demonstration using Mercury&#8217;s Web site, www.MercuryInsurance.com, which offers insurance quotes, Harvey Rosenfield, the founder of Consumer Watchdog, showed that a typical middle aged man with a modest car in Nevada would be charged $835 for six months if he answered yes to the question of whether he currently had coverage. If that same motorist answered no, the six-month premium was quoted as $1,448 &#8212; a 73 percent markup, or surcharge. In California, that is illegal.<\/p>\n<p>Similar or higher surcharges by Mercury have been found in Texas (67 percent) and Florida (227 percent), said Rosenfield, the author of Proposition 103, the 1988 voter-approved law that prohibits insurance companies from raising rates based on previous coverage.(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.contracostatimes.com\/politics-government\/ci_14232081\">CoCo Times 1\/21\/2010<\/a>) <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sure, Mercury will tell you now that they&#8217;ll just give discounts, but the data from other states bears out what really happens. This could end up being quite an expensive little measure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[8321],"class_list":["post-10967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-8321"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2QT","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10967\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}