{"id":11170,"date":"2010-02-26T02:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T02:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-02-25T22:13:38","modified_gmt":"2010-02-25T22:13:38","slug":"pge-wont-let-polling-numbers-get-in-their-way-theyll-just-buy-a-win","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/02\/26\/pge-wont-let-polling-numbers-get-in-their-way-theyll-just-buy-a-win\/","title":{"rendered":"PG&#038;E Won&#8217;t Let Polling Numbers Get in Their Way. They&#8217;ll just Buy a Win"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=http:\/\/i22.photobucket.com\/albums\/b306\/simoniac\/_1satan.jpg align=right width=200>Interesting polls, updates and the like often find their way into my inbox. Much of it goes onto the pile of &#8220;to be written about,&#8221; but time keeps eluding me on actually getting to the bottom of that stack. &nbsp;One such item cannot allude me any longer. &nbsp;It is a poll from Goodwin Simon Research on PG&#038;E&#8217;s Prop 16, the measure that would require supermajorities to vote in favor of adding any new customers to municipal power systems.<\/p>\n<p>The news ain&#8217;t good for PG&#038;E. From a simple reading of the ballot title &#038; statement, they&#8217;re in a pretty tough spot. Just 21% of voters support Prop 16 from just that information. <\/p>\n<p>The pollsters then tossed in a pro-PG&#038;E statement pulled from their ballot argument, &#8220;Proposition 16 would &#8220;require a city or other local government to get a two-thirds vote of its people before it could use public funds to provide or expand new electricity service to residents and business.&#8221; After this, only 32% support, with 42% opposing. <\/p>\n<p>These are horrific numbers to start off a campaign with. But, if you&#8217;re PG&#038;E and willing to plow $6.5 million of your ratepayers money, no mountain is too steep of a climb. As of right now, there&#8217;s not much of a No campaign, but it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to get one going. You wouldn&#8217;t need to match PG&#038;E just have enough to let people know what a dud this truly is.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, I heard that when they were designing the initiative, they tested 2\/3 and simple majority, and 2\/3 tested better. Folks, we have a long way to go.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img src=http:\/\/i22.photobucket.com\/albums\/b306\/simoniac\/_1satan.jpg align=right width=200>Interesting polls, updates and the like often find their way into my inbox. Much of it goes onto the pile of &#8220;to be written about,&#8221; but time keeps eluding me on actually getting to the bottom of that stack. &nbsp;One such item cannot allude me any longer. &nbsp;It is a poll from Goodwin Simon Research on PG&#038;E&#8217;s Prop 16, the measure that would require supermajorities to vote in favor of adding any new customers to municipal power systems.<\/p>\n<p>The news ain&#8217;t good for PG&#038;E. From a simple reading of the ballot title &#038; statement, they&#8217;re in a pretty tough spot. Just 21% of voters support Prop 16 from just that information. <\/p>\n<p>The pollsters then tossed in a pro-PG&#038;E statement pulled from their ballot argument, &#8220;Proposition 16 would &#8220;require a city or other local government to get a two-thirds vote of its people before it could use public funds to provide or expand new electricity service to residents and business.&#8221; After this, only 32% support, with 42% opposing. <\/p>\n<p>These are horrific numbers to start off a campaign with. But, if you&#8217;re PG&#038;E and willing to plow $6.5 million of your ratepayers money, no mountain is too steep of a climb. As of right now, there&#8217;s not much of a No campaign, but it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to get one going. You wouldn&#8217;t need to match PG&#038;E just have enough to let people know what a dud this truly is.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, I heard that when they were designing the initiative, they tested 2\/3 and simple majority, and 2\/3 tested better. Folks, we have a long way to go.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[8308,5745,8405,8307],"class_list":["post-11170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-8308","tag-5745","tag-8405","tag-8307"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2Ua","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11170\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}