{"id":11507,"date":"2010-04-12T19:44:14","date_gmt":"2010-04-12T19:44:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-04-12T19:56:26","modified_gmt":"2010-04-12T19:56:26","slug":"the-dirty-energy-proposition-part-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/04\/12\/the-dirty-energy-proposition-part-i\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dirty Energy Proposition (Part I)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB32 into law.  The bill was a  line in sand on climate change, and with a few exceptions,  California  lawmakers recognized that making the state a leader in clean  tech was a  win-win-win for the people, the economy, and the planet.   AB32 would  ratchet California&#39;s Green House Gas emissions back down to  1990  levels, by 2020.  This effort would create millions of jobs and  attract  huge investments establishing California as a clean tech leader  for  the nation and the world.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Dan Logue (R-CA-3) and few others  are trying to drag CA back  across the line.  I have been<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/nathan-havey\/new-study-ab32-will-creat_b_517441.html\"> writing<\/a> on AB32 for a while, and I couldn&#39;t   understand why Mr. Logue would do this.  I took some time look up a few   of his interviews and I gained some perspective.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Logue does  not base his argument on climate change denialism.  In  fact he <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5Jc03GLKeGU\">argues<\/a>  that AB32 will actually increase carbon  emissions by pushing industry  to less-regulated China, where  manufacturers can pollute as much as  they like, resulting in a net  increase in emissions (Mr. Logue also <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LS0UfglFLdk&amp;feature=related\">advocates<\/a> for the repeal of what current   regulations, which &#8211; it seems to me &#8211; would be a move toward re-creating   the Chinese system here).<\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s like arguing 30 years ago that  requiring seat belts would lead  to less seat belt use because American  companies could no longer  compete with their foreign counterparts and  foreign, seat belt-less cars  would flood the American market.  That is  not what happened.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Logue is also fond of reminding emissions  reduction advocates  that they are forgetting that emissions observe no  political borders.   Greenhouse gasses will waft in from neighboring  states (like Nevada) and  even from countries on the other side of the  planet like China.<\/p>\n<p>It strikes me that perhaps Mr. Logue is missing  the point.  AB32 is  not intended to halt climate change for, as Mr.  Logue correctly  observes, it will not.  It is intended to have  California do its part  and lead by example.<\/p>\n<p>In fact &#8211; Action on  climate change worldwide has stalled because no  one will lead.   Congress wants China and the EU to act first and each of  them want the  Americans to lead.  It is like the global community is  aboard a sinking  pirate ship, and rather than acting together to plug  the holes, they  are working to ensure their share of the treasure.  In  this scenario,  it won&#39;t be long before all of the treasure is at the  bottom of the  ocean, and formerly great powers are simply trying to stay  afloat.<\/p>\n<p>With  the signing of AB32, CA is providing the leadership we lack, and  the  rest of the nation is soon to follow.  The Senate is expected to  take  up a clean energy bill in the coming weeks, and though it may not  be as  visionary as AB32, it will be better than the status-quo.  When it   passes, businesses nationwide will be looking for clean technologies.    If AB32 remains in effect, huge numbers of them will find what they need   in California.<\/p>\n<p>As Mr. Logue and friends focus on the individual  trees of short term  transition, they fail to see the forest of  long-term prosperity, for  California and the nation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB32 into law.  The bill was a  line in sand on climate change, and with a few exceptions,  California  lawmakers recognized that making the state a leader in clean  tech was a  win-win-win for the people, the economy, and the planet.   AB32 would  ratchet California&#39;s Green House Gas emissions back down to  1990  levels, by 2020.  This effort would create millions of jobs and  attract  huge investments establishing California as a clean tech leader  for  the nation and the world.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Dan Logue (R-CA-3) and few others  are trying to drag CA back  across the line.  I have been<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/nathan-havey\/new-study-ab32-will-creat_b_517441.html\"> writing<\/a> on AB32 for a while, and I couldn&#39;t   understand why Mr. Logue would do this.  I took some time look up a few   of his interviews and I gained some perspective.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Logue does  not base his argument on climate change denialism.  In  fact he <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5Jc03GLKeGU\">argues<\/a>  that AB32 will actually increase carbon  emissions by pushing industry  to less-regulated China, where  manufacturers can pollute as much as  they like, resulting in a net  increase in emissions (Mr. Logue also <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LS0UfglFLdk&amp;feature=related\">advocates<\/a> for the repeal of what current   regulations, which &#8211; it seems to me &#8211; would be a move toward re-creating   the Chinese system here).<\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s like arguing 30 years ago that  requiring seat belts would lead  to less seat belt use because American  companies could no longer  compete with their foreign counterparts and  foreign, seat belt-less cars  would flood the American market.  That is  not what happened.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Logue is also fond of reminding emissions  reduction advocates  that they are forgetting that emissions observe no  political borders.   Greenhouse gasses will waft in from neighboring  states (like Nevada) and  even from countries on the other side of the  planet like China.<\/p>\n<p>It strikes me that perhaps Mr. Logue is missing  the point.  AB32 is  not intended to halt climate change for, as Mr.  Logue correctly  observes, it will not.  It is intended to have  California do its part  and lead by example.<\/p>\n<p>In fact &#8211; Action on  climate change worldwide has stalled because no  one will lead.   Congress wants China and the EU to act first and each of  them want the  Americans to lead.  It is like the global community is  aboard a sinking  pirate ship, and rather than acting together to plug  the holes, they  are working to ensure their share of the treasure.  In  this scenario,  it won&#39;t be long before all of the treasure is at the  bottom of the  ocean, and formerly great powers are simply trying to stay  afloat.<\/p>\n<p>With  the signing of AB32, CA is providing the leadership we lack, and  the  rest of the nation is soon to follow.  The Senate is expected to  take  up a clean energy bill in the coming weeks, and though it may not  be as  visionary as AB32, it will be better than the status-quo.  When it   passes, businesses nationwide will be looking for clean technologies.    If AB32 remains in effect, huge numbers of them will find what they need   in California.<\/p>\n<p>As Mr. Logue and friends focus on the individual  trees of short term  transition, they fail to see the forest of  long-term prosperity, for  California and the nation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2637,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[8404,4966,1345,8363,6104,7162,8527],"class_list":["post-11507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-8404","tag-4966","tag-1345","tag-8363","tag-6104","tag-7162","tag-8527"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2ZB","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11507"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11507\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}