{"id":11512,"date":"2010-04-13T02:18:44","date_gmt":"2010-04-13T02:18:44","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-04-13T02:18:44","modified_gmt":"2010-04-13T02:18:44","slug":"prop-8-repeal-wont-be-on-the-ballot-in-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/04\/13\/prop-8-repeal-wont-be-on-the-ballot-in-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Prop 8 Repeal Won&#8217;t Be on the Ballot in 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Cross-posted from <a href=\"http:\/\/prop8trialtracker.com\/2010\/04\/12\/prop-8-wont-be...ballot-in-2010\/\">Prop 8 Trial Tracker<\/a><\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Today, Love Honor Cherish, the leader of the Repeal Prop 8 2010 organization sent out a press release announcing that they had failed to get enough signatures on the ballot. (<a href=\"http:\/\/prop8trialtracker.com\/2010\/04\/12\/prop-8-wont-be...ballot-in-2010\">The full release is available in the full post<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Love Honor Cherish, which spearheaded an effort to place an initiative on the November 2010 ballot to repeal Proposition 8 and restore equal marriage rights for same-sex couples, announced today that the proponents did not gather the 694,354 signatures necessary to place the proposed initiative on the ballot. &nbsp;The group vowed to work toward the repeal of Prop 8 at the next general election in November 2012.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a heartbreaking moment,&#8221; said John Henning, Executive Director of Love Honor Cherish. &nbsp;&#8220;Despite the dogged efforts of &nbsp;hundreds of volunteers across California, we did not get the signatures we needed within the 150-day window set by the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Under California law, it is too late to mount a new effort to repeal Prop 8 in 2010. &nbsp;&#8220;Regrettably, Prop 8 will remain as a stain on our constitution until at least 2012, and perhaps later,&#8221; said Henning. &nbsp;He challenged activists statewide to rededicate themselves and unify behind a 2012 repeal effort.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While this isn&#8217;t a surprise, it does end a trying divide within the LGBT community. &nbsp;I do not speak for the courage campaign or anybody other than myself here, but generally, I&#8217;m inclined to believe gubernatorial elections have a better electorate for our side. That is 2010 would have been better than 2008, and 2014 will be better than 2012. &nbsp; During off year elections, you get better educated electorates, and that correlates fairly well with those who aren&#8217;t really bothered by marriage equality. &nbsp;I have done some analysis looking at that, but also have spoken to a few huge voter number nerds who agree with that hypothesis. &nbsp;It&#8217;s still an open question, however.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, time matters as well, probably even more than presidential or gubernatorial year. As more millenials spill into the voting ranks, more pro-equality votes are stacking up on our side. &nbsp;While 2 years won&#8217;t make a huge difference, many number nerds think it is<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fivethirtyeight.com\/2009\/04\/will-iowans-uphold-gay-marriage.html\"> just under 2 percent per year that the electorate moves toward equality<\/a>. Obviously, that&#8217;s far from a precise number, but 4 percent would be enough to flip the Prop 8 vote around.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, this time we would be running a Yes campaign, which is always more challenging. &nbsp;Given this news and the rumblings coming out of major LGBT organizations, it looks we are headed like a laser beam towards a 2012 confrontation for our marriage rights.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a shame that Prop 8 still stands, and it is my sincere hope that Judge Walker and the federal courts strike it down. &nbsp;However, I am very cognizant of the fact that we are likely headed to the ballot. &nbsp;Get your door-knocking shoes all polished up, we have work to do.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>INITIATIVE TO REPEAL PROP 8 WILL NOT BE ON THE BALLOT IN 2010<br \/>\n<br \/>All-Volunteer Petition Drive Triggered Conversations Across California<br \/>\n<br \/>(LOS ANGELES &#8211; April 12, 2010)<\/p>\n<p>Love Honor Cherish, which spearheaded an effort to place an initiative on the November 2010 ballot to repeal Proposition 8 and restore equal marriage rights for same-sex couples, announced today that the proponents did not gather the 694,354 signatures necessary to place the proposed initiative on the ballot. &nbsp;The group vowed to work toward the repeal of Prop 8 at the next general election in November 2012.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a heartbreaking moment,&#8221; said John Henning, Executive Director of Love Honor Cherish. &nbsp;&#8220;Despite the dogged efforts of &nbsp;hundreds of volunteers across California, we did not get the signatures we needed within the 150-day window set by the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Under California law, it is too late to mount a new effort to repeal Prop 8 in 2010. &nbsp;&#8220;Regrettably, Prop 8 will remain as a stain on our constitution until at least 2012, and perhaps later,&#8221; said Henning. &nbsp;He challenged activists statewide to rededicate themselves and unify behind a 2012 repeal effort.<\/p>\n<p>Prop 8 passed by a margin of 52 to 48 percent. &nbsp;However, polls taken since the vote have shown that a majority of Californians now support the right of same-sex couples to marry, indicating that a new ballot proposition to repeal Prop 8 would be likely to pass in November 2010. &nbsp;In March, a poll by the Public Policy Institute of California showed a 6 percent increase in support for equal marriage rights in just the last year. <\/p>\n<p>The proponents of the repeal initiative sought to seize the momentum unleashed by the passage of Prop 8 and parlay it into a victory at the polls. &nbsp;&#8220;This signature campaign was the right thing to do in the wake of Prop 8,&#8221; said Love Honor Cherish board member Lester Aponte. &nbsp;&#8220;We were determined to act affirmatively to achieve equality and we will continue to do that until Prop 8 has been finally repealed. &nbsp;We had hundreds of thousands of conversations with California voters about the right to marry and we know that we have moved hearts and minds. &nbsp;In the process, we have set the foundation &nbsp;for a future repeal effort and brought hope to thousands whose hearts were broken by the passage of Prop 8.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Love Honor Cherish was one of more than 40 groups supporting the repeal of Prop 8 in November 2010, and was part of the Restore Equality 2010 coalition. &nbsp;The campaign utilized a unique web-based social networking tool, located at www.SignForEquality.com, which enabled volunteers to download the petition form, watch training videos and join teams.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Cross-posted from <a href=\"http:\/\/prop8trialtracker.com\/2010\/04\/12\/prop-8-wont-be...ballot-in-2010\/\">Prop 8 Trial Tracker<\/a><\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Today, Love Honor Cherish, the leader of the Repeal Prop 8 2010 organization sent out a press release announcing that they had failed to get enough signatures on the ballot. (<a href=\"http:\/\/prop8trialtracker.com\/2010\/04\/12\/prop-8-wont-be...ballot-in-2010\">The full release is available in the full post<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Love Honor Cherish, which spearheaded an effort to place an initiative on the November 2010 ballot to repeal Proposition 8 and restore equal marriage rights for same-sex couples, announced today that the proponents did not gather the 694,354 signatures necessary to place the proposed initiative on the ballot. &nbsp;The group vowed to work toward the repeal of Prop 8 at the next general election in November 2012.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a heartbreaking moment,&#8221; said John Henning, Executive Director of Love Honor Cherish. &nbsp;&#8220;Despite the dogged efforts of &nbsp;hundreds of volunteers across California, we did not get the signatures we needed within the 150-day window set by the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Under California law, it is too late to mount a new effort to repeal Prop 8 in 2010. &nbsp;&#8220;Regrettably, Prop 8 will remain as a stain on our constitution until at least 2012, and perhaps later,&#8221; said Henning. &nbsp;He challenged activists statewide to rededicate themselves and unify behind a 2012 repeal effort.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While this isn&#8217;t a surprise, it does end a trying divide within the LGBT community. &nbsp;I do not speak for the courage campaign or anybody other than myself here, but generally, I&#8217;m inclined to believe gubernatorial elections have a better electorate for our side. That is 2010 would have been better than 2008, and 2014 will be better than 2012. &nbsp; During off year elections, you get better educated electorates, and that correlates fairly well with those who aren&#8217;t really bothered by marriage equality. &nbsp;I have done some analysis looking at that, but also have spoken to a few huge voter number nerds who agree with that hypothesis. &nbsp;It&#8217;s still an open question, however.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, time matters as well, probably even more than presidential or gubernatorial year. As more millenials spill into the voting ranks, more pro-equality votes are stacking up on our side. &nbsp;While 2 years won&#8217;t make a huge difference, many number nerds think it is<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fivethirtyeight.com\/2009\/04\/will-iowans-uphold-gay-marriage.html\"> just under 2 percent per year that the electorate moves toward equality<\/a>. Obviously, that&#8217;s far from a precise number, but 4 percent would be enough to flip the Prop 8 vote around.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, this time we would be running a Yes campaign, which is always more challenging. &nbsp;Given this news and the rumblings coming out of major LGBT organizations, it looks we are headed like a laser beam towards a 2012 confrontation for our marriage rights.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a shame that Prop 8 still stands, and it is my sincere hope that Judge Walker and the federal courts strike it down. &nbsp;However, I am very cognizant of the fact that we are likely headed to the ballot. &nbsp;Get your door-knocking shoes all polished up, we have work to do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1608],"tags":[558,5576],"class_list":["post-11512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1608","tag-558","tag-5576"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2ZG","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}