{"id":11557,"date":"2010-04-21T22:47:01","date_gmt":"2010-04-21T22:47:01","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-04-21T22:47:01","modified_gmt":"2010-04-21T22:47:01","slug":"hey-ca-dont-get-fooled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/04\/21\/hey-ca-dont-get-fooled\/","title":{"rendered":"Hey CA &#8211; Don&#8217;t Get Fooled"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Dirty Energy Proposition (aka the California Jobs Initiative)  blew by its self-imposed signature collection deadline last week.  The  campaign is working to gather the more than 400,000 signatures needed to  get the proposal to kill California&#39;s landmark climate and clean energy  law on the November ballot. Apparently their expectation that a good  turnout at Tea Party rallies would <a href=\"http:\/\/camajorityreport.com\/index.php?module=articles&amp;func=display&amp;ptid=9&amp;aid=4231\" target=\"_hplink\">result in tens of thousands of signatures to Suspend  AB 32<\/a> was a bit optimistic. However, California&#39;s environment and  economy aren&#39;t in the clear yet, as almost <a href=\"http:\/\/cal-access.sos.ca.gov\/Campaign\/Committees\/Detail.aspx?id=1323890&amp;view=late1\" target=\"_hplink\">$1,000,000 in additional funding<\/a> has been recently  contributed to the proposal.  So are throngs of Californians getting in  action?  Nope.  <\/p>\n<p> So which money trees did the new wads of green come from? In keeping  with the campaign&#39;s MO, none other than top U.S. polluters and  out-of-state interests. Of course looking at the newest contributor the  Adam Smith Foundation, which <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.showmeprogress.com\/diary\/4430\/missouris-adam-smith-foundation-gives-498000-to-repeal-californias-greenhouse-gas-law\" target=\"_hplink\">donated a hefty $458,000<\/a>, this isn&#39;t exactly  obvious at first glance &#8211; but dig a little deeper and it becomes clear  that the group fits in perfectly with its dirty oil counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>Out-of-state? Check. The Adam Smith Foundation is a <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">non-profit group based in Jefferson City, Mo.<\/a>,  keeping in line with Texas based oil contributors Valero and Tesoro.<\/p>\n<p>Suspicious motives? Check. While the group <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adamsmithfoundation.com\/\" target=\"_hplink\">calls itself<\/a>  &#8220;an advocacy organization committed to promoting conservative  principles and individual liberties in Missouri&#8221; and &#8220;created to defend  judicial reform, government accountability, education reform, tax and  spending reform and protecting private property&#8221;, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firedupmissouri.com\/roe_harris_adam_smith_foundation\" target=\"_hplink\">reality is<\/a> that it acts &#8220;as a corporate non-profit  front group&#8230;with ties to stalwart Republican operatives with a history  political thuggery and malfeasance&#8221;. Hmm, kind of like how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.valero.com\/Environment_Safety\/Pages\/Home.aspx\" target=\"_hplink\">Valero claims<\/a> &#8220;environmental stewardship is a core  value&#8221; for the company, yet is ranked 12th on The Political Economy  Research Institute&#39;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.peri.umass.edu\/toxic_index\/\" target=\"_hplink\">&#8220;100 worst air polluters&#8221;<\/a> in the U.S. (Tesoro came  in right behind at number 30).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the suspension group&#39;s new plan of attack in using  non-profits as a puppet to <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">mask the original source of funds<\/a> is an attempt to  avoid any more <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aolnews.com\/nation\/article\/california-activists-urge-boycott-of-valero-gas\/19433013\" target=\"_hplink\">boycotts<\/a> like the one Californians have launched  against Valero. But Californian&#39;s can&#39;t be played so easily, and this  ploy does little to mask the real interests tugging at the puppet  strings. Especially when the other <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">major donors to the committee<\/a> &#8220;include Occidental  Petroleum ($300,000), Tesoro Companies ($200,000), World Oil Corp.  ($100,000)&#8221; and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association ($100,000).<\/p>\n<p>The underlining question here is how exactly did the fight to kill a  piece of California legislation become a top priority for so many? Oil  companies and out-of-state special interests fear that clean energy  would decrease our dependence on their dirty fossil fuels, thus cutting  into their profits and challenging the need for their industry. They  know that the reports of further <a href=\"http:\/\/cleantech.com\/about\/pressreleases\/20090106.cfm\" target=\"_hplink\">investment<\/a>,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.next10.org\/next10\/publications\/green_jobs.html\" target=\"_hplink\"> job growth<\/a> and increasing prosperity that AB 32  promises, chips away at the stranglehold they have us in.  <\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s one thing this manipulating campaign has right &#8211; that AB 32  will jump start a green economy that will threaten dirty energy  interests. AB 32 has led businesses to put a new emphasis on  environmental concerns, and in turn driven a strong job growth in the  green sector. This is highlighted in The California Workforce  Association Conference <a href=\"http:\/\/www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov\/contentpub\/GreenDigest\/CWA-green-jobs-0410.pdf\" target=\"_hplink\">recent study <\/a>&#8220;California&#39;s Green Economy&#8221;,  revealing the increased focus on green products and services and how  manufacturing and construction industries are actually leading with the  most green jobs. However, suspending AB 32 would halt this transition  towards a cleaner and greener California.<\/p>\n<p>As the final weeks of signature collecting get underway &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/share.php?u=http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/nathan-havey\/hey-ca---dont-get-fooled_b_546196.html\" target=\"_hplink\">spread<\/a> the word about the Dirty Energy  Proposition.  After all, the last time out-of-state Energy interests  claimed to have Californians&#39; best interests at heart, we got rolling  blackouts, courtesy of Enron.  Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice  . . .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Dirty Energy Proposition (aka the California Jobs Initiative)  blew by its self-imposed signature collection deadline last week.  The  campaign is working to gather the more than 400,000 signatures needed to  get the proposal to kill California&#39;s landmark climate and clean energy  law on the November ballot. Apparently their expectation that a good  turnout at Tea Party rallies would <a href=\"http:\/\/camajorityreport.com\/index.php?module=articles&amp;func=display&amp;ptid=9&amp;aid=4231\" target=\"_hplink\">result in tens of thousands of signatures to Suspend  AB 32<\/a> was a bit optimistic. However, California&#39;s environment and  economy aren&#39;t in the clear yet, as almost <a href=\"http:\/\/cal-access.sos.ca.gov\/Campaign\/Committees\/Detail.aspx?id=1323890&amp;view=late1\" target=\"_hplink\">$1,000,000 in additional funding<\/a> has been recently  contributed to the proposal.  So are throngs of Californians getting in  action?  Nope.  <\/p>\n<p> So which money trees did the new wads of green come from? In keeping  with the campaign&#39;s MO, none other than top U.S. polluters and  out-of-state interests. Of course looking at the newest contributor the  Adam Smith Foundation, which <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.showmeprogress.com\/diary\/4430\/missouris-adam-smith-foundation-gives-498000-to-repeal-californias-greenhouse-gas-law\" target=\"_hplink\">donated a hefty $458,000<\/a>, this isn&#39;t exactly  obvious at first glance &#8211; but dig a little deeper and it becomes clear  that the group fits in perfectly with its dirty oil counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>Out-of-state? Check. The Adam Smith Foundation is a <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">non-profit group based in Jefferson City, Mo.<\/a>,  keeping in line with Texas based oil contributors Valero and Tesoro.<\/p>\n<p>Suspicious motives? Check. While the group <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adamsmithfoundation.com\/\" target=\"_hplink\">calls itself<\/a>  &#8220;an advocacy organization committed to promoting conservative  principles and individual liberties in Missouri&#8221; and &#8220;created to defend  judicial reform, government accountability, education reform, tax and  spending reform and protecting private property&#8221;, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firedupmissouri.com\/roe_harris_adam_smith_foundation\" target=\"_hplink\">reality is<\/a> that it acts &#8220;as a corporate non-profit  front group&#8230;with ties to stalwart Republican operatives with a history  political thuggery and malfeasance&#8221;. Hmm, kind of like how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.valero.com\/Environment_Safety\/Pages\/Home.aspx\" target=\"_hplink\">Valero claims<\/a> &#8220;environmental stewardship is a core  value&#8221; for the company, yet is ranked 12th on The Political Economy  Research Institute&#39;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.peri.umass.edu\/toxic_index\/\" target=\"_hplink\">&#8220;100 worst air polluters&#8221;<\/a> in the U.S. (Tesoro came  in right behind at number 30).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the suspension group&#39;s new plan of attack in using  non-profits as a puppet to <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">mask the original source of funds<\/a> is an attempt to  avoid any more <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aolnews.com\/nation\/article\/california-activists-urge-boycott-of-valero-gas\/19433013\" target=\"_hplink\">boycotts<\/a> like the one Californians have launched  against Valero. But Californian&#39;s can&#39;t be played so easily, and this  ploy does little to mask the real interests tugging at the puppet  strings. Especially when the other <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/california-politics\/2010\/04\/repeal-greenhouse-gas-law-campaign-contribution.html\" target=\"_hplink\">major donors to the committee<\/a> &#8220;include Occidental  Petroleum ($300,000), Tesoro Companies ($200,000), World Oil Corp.  ($100,000)&#8221; and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association ($100,000).<\/p>\n<p>The underlining question here is how exactly did the fight to kill a  piece of California legislation become a top priority for so many? Oil  companies and out-of-state special interests fear that clean energy  would decrease our dependence on their dirty fossil fuels, thus cutting  into their profits and challenging the need for their industry. They  know that the reports of further <a href=\"http:\/\/cleantech.com\/about\/pressreleases\/20090106.cfm\" target=\"_hplink\">investment<\/a>,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.next10.org\/next10\/publications\/green_jobs.html\" target=\"_hplink\"> job growth<\/a> and increasing prosperity that AB 32  promises, chips away at the stranglehold they have us in.  <\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s one thing this manipulating campaign has right &#8211; that AB 32  will jump start a green economy that will threaten dirty energy  interests. AB 32 has led businesses to put a new emphasis on  environmental concerns, and in turn driven a strong job growth in the  green sector. This is highlighted in The California Workforce  Association Conference <a href=\"http:\/\/www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov\/contentpub\/GreenDigest\/CWA-green-jobs-0410.pdf\" target=\"_hplink\">recent study <\/a>&#8220;California&#39;s Green Economy&#8221;,  revealing the increased focus on green products and services and how  manufacturing and construction industries are actually leading with the  most green jobs. However, suspending AB 32 would halt this transition  towards a cleaner and greener California.<\/p>\n<p>As the final weeks of signature collecting get underway &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/share.php?u=http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/nathan-havey\/hey-ca---dont-get-fooled_b_546196.html\" target=\"_hplink\">spread<\/a> the word about the Dirty Energy  Proposition.  After all, the last time out-of-state Energy interests  claimed to have Californians&#39; best interests at heart, we got rolling  blackouts, courtesy of Enron.  Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice  . . .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2637,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[87,86],"tags":[8404,8699,4966,1345,8700,6104,7162,8519,8527],"class_list":["post-11557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-87","category-86","tag-8404","tag-8699","tag-4966","tag-1345","tag-8700","tag-6104","tag-7162","tag-8519","tag-8527"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-30p","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}