{"id":11579,"date":"2010-04-26T21:11:02","date_gmt":"2010-04-26T21:11:02","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-04-26T21:11:02","modified_gmt":"2010-04-26T21:11:02","slug":"megomercial-doubles-down-on-ab-32","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/04\/26\/megomercial-doubles-down-on-ab-32\/","title":{"rendered":"Meg-o-Mercial Doubles Down on AB 32"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Meg Whitman&#8217;s big infomercial wasn&#8217;t quite the prime time affair that President Obama&#8217;s was, but she did find time to lay out just how extreme she&#8217;s getting on issues of climate change.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On the substance, the Whitman infomercial repeats many of her now tried-and-true campaign slogans (focus &#8220;on just three things&#8221; as governor, &#8220;100% against amnesty&#8221;). But there were a few nuggets that either sounded a bit different, or highlighted issues in a way that merit at least a mention.<\/p>\n<p>Whitman repeats her support of a one-year delay in implementing the state&#8217;s landmark global warming bill, AB 32. But rather than a more measured response, in the infomercial she flat out calls the law &#8220;a job killer.&#8221;(<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/capitalnotes\/2010\/04\/25\/look-its-meg\/\">Capitol Notes<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This might not seem all that big, but she is now attaching her banner solidly behind the repeal AB 32 side. The language is straight out of Valero&#8217;s talking points.<\/p>\n<p>And on her &#8220;cut 40,000 employees&#8221; talking point, John Myers does a little bit of fact-checking:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On the now familiar Whitman criticism of too many workers employed by the state, the candidate takes a more firm stance about why these positions (40,000, she&#8217;s promised) can be eliminated. She tells the audience that this is the amount by which the state workforce has grown since 2004.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not front line employees,&#8221; says the candidate. &#8220;It&#8217;s not the CHP, it&#8217;s not CalFire, it is the bureaucracy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A bit more thorough reporting than can be done on a Sunday is required, but even a general review of state data online shows that Whitman&#8217;s &#8220;bureaucrats&#8221; must include employees of the state prison system &#8211; where the workforce has grown and costs have noticeably increased. There are now some 69,000 corrections employees (more than half are guards), and as the department&#8217;s own report states, 70% of the prisons budget comes from staff salaries and benefits.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s really great when you can sort of spin a yarn and nobody calls you on it. Whitman wants to slash the &#8220;bureaucracy&#8221; by 40,000. Ok, so, how&#8217;s about we get a little more specific. Let&#8217;s see Whitman come up with 40,000 jobs that she would like to cut.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, she won&#8217;t actually do it, but her nonsensical and out of context call for the heads of state workers is both unproductive for the state and a simple act of scapegoating. But, we&#8217;ve come to expect both from Whitman, and this was her TV ad, after all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Meg Whitman&#8217;s big infomercial wasn&#8217;t quite the prime time affair that President Obama&#8217;s was, but she did find time to lay out just how extreme she&#8217;s getting on issues of climate change.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On the substance, the Whitman infomercial repeats many of her now tried-and-true campaign slogans (focus &#8220;on just three things&#8221; as governor, &#8220;100% against amnesty&#8221;). But there were a few nuggets that either sounded a bit different, or highlighted issues in a way that merit at least a mention.<\/p>\n<p>Whitman repeats her support of a one-year delay in implementing the state&#8217;s landmark global warming bill, AB 32. But rather than a more measured response, in the infomercial she flat out calls the law &#8220;a job killer.&#8221;(<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kqed.org\/capitalnotes\/2010\/04\/25\/look-its-meg\/\">Capitol Notes<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This might not seem all that big, but she is now attaching her banner solidly behind the repeal AB 32 side. The language is straight out of Valero&#8217;s talking points.<\/p>\n<p>And on her &#8220;cut 40,000 employees&#8221; talking point, John Myers does a little bit of fact-checking:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On the now familiar Whitman criticism of too many workers employed by the state, the candidate takes a more firm stance about why these positions (40,000, she&#8217;s promised) can be eliminated. She tells the audience that this is the amount by which the state workforce has grown since 2004.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not front line employees,&#8221; says the candidate. &#8220;It&#8217;s not the CHP, it&#8217;s not CalFire, it is the bureaucracy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A bit more thorough reporting than can be done on a Sunday is required, but even a general review of state data online shows that Whitman&#8217;s &#8220;bureaucrats&#8221; must include employees of the state prison system &#8211; where the workforce has grown and costs have noticeably increased. There are now some 69,000 corrections employees (more than half are guards), and as the department&#8217;s own report states, 70% of the prisons budget comes from staff salaries and benefits.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s really great when you can sort of spin a yarn and nobody calls you on it. Whitman wants to slash the &#8220;bureaucracy&#8221; by 40,000. Ok, so, how&#8217;s about we get a little more specific. Let&#8217;s see Whitman come up with 40,000 jobs that she would like to cut.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, she won&#8217;t actually do it, but her nonsensical and out of context call for the heads of state workers is both unproductive for the state and a simple act of scapegoating. But, we&#8217;ve come to expect both from Whitman, and this was her TV ad, after all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[750,4467],"class_list":["post-11579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-750","tag-4467"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-30L","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11579\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}