{"id":11939,"date":"2010-06-25T16:32:30","date_gmt":"2010-06-25T16:32:30","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-06-25T16:32:30","modified_gmt":"2010-06-25T16:32:30","slug":"small-business-support-for-clean-energy-a-key-to-2010-elections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/06\/25\/small-business-support-for-clean-energy-a-key-to-2010-elections\/","title":{"rendered":"Small Business Support for Clean Energy A Key to 2010 Elections?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday&rsquo;s <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/dcnow\/2010\/06\/senate-democrats-vow-to-tackle-energy-bill.html\">Democratic   Senate caucus meeting<\/a> &ndash; combined with Majority Leader Reid&rsquo;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/24\/879099\/-Breaking:-Harry-Reids-High-Stakes-Climate-Gamble\">push   on this issue<\/a>, combined with President Obama&rsquo;s leadership,  combined  with a clear demand by the public for action &ndash; has given  comprehensive  clean energy and climate legislation a major boost as we  head towards  the 4th of July recess.  Clearly, at this point, there&rsquo;s a  better path  to 60 votes in the U.S. Senate for comprehensive clean  energy and  climate legislation than ever before. We are that close to  making  history, let&rsquo;s make sure we seize this moment! <\/p>\n<p>With all that  in mind, a recent national survey by <a href=\"http:\/\/gqrr.com\/index.php?ID=2456\">Al Quinlan of Greenburg Quinlan   Rosner Research<\/a> has potentially powerful implications for the 2010   elections, providing yet more evidence that climate legislation &ndash;   despite a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/23\/878679\/-MSM-Narrative-on-Energy-Climate-Politics-Completely-Wrong\">fallacious   &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; narrative arguing otherwise<\/a> &ndash; is actually good   politics.  The key findings are threefold (note: the document talks   about strategy for the Democratic Party, but could apply to Republicans   as well):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Small businesses &ldquo;are among America&rsquo;s most popular  entities,&rdquo; with  an eye-popping 44:1 favorable to unfavorable ratio  (&ldquo;the highest we  have ever seen in our polling on any topic&rdquo;)<\/li>\n<li>Generating support from small business owners, for either political   party, is a key to success in the upcoming mid-term elections.<\/li>\n<li>Small business owners <a href=\"http:\/\/www.portfolio.com\/views\/blogs\/daily-brief\/2010\/06\/22\/small-business-owners-back-clean-energy\">strongly   agree<\/a> &ldquo;that a move to clean energy will help restart the economy   and lead to job creation by small businesses.&rdquo;  In fact, according to   Greenburg Quinlan, &ldquo;One of the most surprising findings of the survey is   that despite the fact that nearly two thirds of business owners  believe  it would increase costs for their businesses, a majority still  want to  move forward on clean energy and climate policy.&rdquo; <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As if  that&rsquo;s not evidence enough that there&rsquo;s broad support out there  for  comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation, how about <a href=\"http:\/\/lcv-ftp.org\/LCV\/2000cew.pdf\">this Benenson Survey Group   survey<\/a>, conducted in late May\/early June 2010?  The key findings of   this poll are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>65% of &ldquo;likely 2010 voters&rdquo; believe that  &ldquo;the federal government  should invest much more than it currently  invests [or] somewhat more  than it currently invests .&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>63% of  &ldquo;likely 2010 voters&rdquo; support an energy bill that would &ldquo;limit   pollution, invest in domestic energy sources and encourage companies to   use and develop clean energy&hellip;in part by charging energy companies for   carbon pollution in electricity or fuels like gas.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>Among  &ldquo;undecided voters,&rdquo; &ldquo;62% support the bill and just 21% oppose.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>  There is also <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/06\/08\/poll-bp-spill-climate-energy-bill\/\">strong   evidence from this polling that voters<\/a> &ndash; including independent   voters by a 2.5:1 margin &ndash; are strongly inclined, by around a 2:1   margin, to be &ldquo;more likely to re-elect&rdquo; their Senator if he or she voted   for a strong, comprehensive, clean energy and climate bill.<\/p>\n<p>In  sum, solid majorities of small businesspeople and the public at  large  both support comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation.    Which is why, once again &ndash; as we <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/23\/878679\/-MSM-Narrative-on-Energy-Climate-Politics-Completely-Wrong\">pointed   out yesterday<\/a> &ndash; the &ldquo;mainstream media&rdquo; narrative, that voting for   limits on carbon pollution is bad politics, is just dead wrong. To the   contrary, victory this November could go to the candidates &ndash; and the   party &ndash; that seizes this issue and makes it their own.  Ideally, it   would be great to see both Republicans and Democrats fighting to be the   &ldquo;greenest&rdquo; candidate, and not just in terms of how much money they   raise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPDATE<\/strong>: Add <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/06\/24\/nbc-poll-public-support-global-warming-action-cost-of-energy\/\">another   poll<\/a> to the list, this one by WSJ-NBC indicating that &ldquo;Respondents   favored comprehensive energy and carbon pollution reduction  legislation  by 63 percent to 31 percent &ndash; a two to one margin.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday&rsquo;s <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/dcnow\/2010\/06\/senate-democrats-vow-to-tackle-energy-bill.html\">Democratic   Senate caucus meeting<\/a> &ndash; combined with Majority Leader Reid&rsquo;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/24\/879099\/-Breaking:-Harry-Reids-High-Stakes-Climate-Gamble\">push   on this issue<\/a>, combined with President Obama&rsquo;s leadership,  combined  with a clear demand by the public for action &ndash; has given  comprehensive  clean energy and climate legislation a major boost as we  head towards  the 4th of July recess.  Clearly, at this point, there&rsquo;s a  better path  to 60 votes in the U.S. Senate for comprehensive clean  energy and  climate legislation than ever before. We are that close to  making  history, let&rsquo;s make sure we seize this moment! <\/p>\n<p>With all that  in mind, a recent national survey by <a href=\"http:\/\/gqrr.com\/index.php?ID=2456\">Al Quinlan of Greenburg Quinlan   Rosner Research<\/a> has potentially powerful implications for the 2010   elections, providing yet more evidence that climate legislation &ndash;   despite a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/23\/878679\/-MSM-Narrative-on-Energy-Climate-Politics-Completely-Wrong\">fallacious   &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; narrative arguing otherwise<\/a> &ndash; is actually good   politics.  The key findings are threefold (note: the document talks   about strategy for the Democratic Party, but could apply to Republicans   as well):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Small businesses &ldquo;are among America&rsquo;s most popular  entities,&rdquo; with  an eye-popping 44:1 favorable to unfavorable ratio  (&ldquo;the highest we  have ever seen in our polling on any topic&rdquo;)<\/li>\n<li>Generating support from small business owners, for either political   party, is a key to success in the upcoming mid-term elections.<\/li>\n<li>Small business owners <a href=\"http:\/\/www.portfolio.com\/views\/blogs\/daily-brief\/2010\/06\/22\/small-business-owners-back-clean-energy\">strongly   agree<\/a> &ldquo;that a move to clean energy will help restart the economy   and lead to job creation by small businesses.&rdquo;  In fact, according to   Greenburg Quinlan, &ldquo;One of the most surprising findings of the survey is   that despite the fact that nearly two thirds of business owners  believe  it would increase costs for their businesses, a majority still  want to  move forward on clean energy and climate policy.&rdquo; <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As if  that&rsquo;s not evidence enough that there&rsquo;s broad support out there  for  comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation, how about <a href=\"http:\/\/lcv-ftp.org\/LCV\/2000cew.pdf\">this Benenson Survey Group   survey<\/a>, conducted in late May\/early June 2010?  The key findings of   this poll are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>65% of &ldquo;likely 2010 voters&rdquo; believe that  &ldquo;the federal government  should invest much more than it currently  invests [or] somewhat more  than it currently invests .&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>63% of  &ldquo;likely 2010 voters&rdquo; support an energy bill that would &ldquo;limit   pollution, invest in domestic energy sources and encourage companies to   use and develop clean energy&hellip;in part by charging energy companies for   carbon pollution in electricity or fuels like gas.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<li>Among  &ldquo;undecided voters,&rdquo; &ldquo;62% support the bill and just 21% oppose.&rdquo;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>  There is also <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/06\/08\/poll-bp-spill-climate-energy-bill\/\">strong   evidence from this polling that voters<\/a> &ndash; including independent   voters by a 2.5:1 margin &ndash; are strongly inclined, by around a 2:1   margin, to be &ldquo;more likely to re-elect&rdquo; their Senator if he or she voted   for a strong, comprehensive, clean energy and climate bill.<\/p>\n<p>In  sum, solid majorities of small businesspeople and the public at  large  both support comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation.    Which is why, once again &ndash; as we <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2010\/6\/23\/878679\/-MSM-Narrative-on-Energy-Climate-Politics-Completely-Wrong\">pointed   out yesterday<\/a> &ndash; the &ldquo;mainstream media&rdquo; narrative, that voting for   limits on carbon pollution is bad politics, is just dead wrong. To the   contrary, victory this November could go to the candidates &ndash; and the   party &ndash; that seizes this issue and makes it their own.  Ideally, it   would be great to see both Republicans and Democrats fighting to be the   &ldquo;greenest&rdquo; candidate, and not just in terms of how much money they   raise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPDATE<\/strong>: Add <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/06\/24\/nbc-poll-public-support-global-warming-action-cost-of-energy\/\">another   poll<\/a> to the list, this one by WSJ-NBC indicating that &ldquo;Respondents   favored comprehensive energy and carbon pollution reduction  legislation  by 63 percent to 31 percent &ndash; a two to one margin.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5274,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1990],"tags":[4966,3664,8398,132,1984],"class_list":["post-11939","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1990","tag-4966","tag-3664","tag-8398","tag-132","tag-1984"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-36z","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11939","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5274"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11939"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11939\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}