{"id":12208,"date":"2010-07-28T23:14:18","date_gmt":"2010-07-28T23:14:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-07-28T23:14:18","modified_gmt":"2010-07-28T23:14:18","slug":"ppp-has-good-numbers-for-boxer-and-brown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/07\/28\/ppp-has-good-numbers-for-boxer-and-brown\/","title":{"rendered":"PPP Has Good Numbers for Boxer and Brown"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Public Policy Polling (PPP) has been polling California this week, and found some very favorable news for Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown.<\/p>\n<p>In their Senate polling, PPP found that <a href=\"http:\/\/publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com\/2010\/07\/boxers-expands-lead.html\">Boxer has a 49-40 lead over Fiorina<\/a>, up from 45-42 back in May. They also found that Fiorina&#8217;s negatives are rising, with 28% having a favorable view and 40% having an unfavorable view. Independent voters in particular have shifted against Fiorina, with Boxer leading there 48-38.<\/p>\n<p>Fiorina&#8217;s inept campaign and her desire to run as an extreme right-wing candidate, combined with her support of high unemployment and mass layoffs, means that if we continue to work hard, Boxer should be able to win this race.<\/p>\n<p>PPP found <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicpolicypolling.com\/pdf\/PPP_Release_CA_728.pdf\">similar numbers for the governor&#8217;s race<\/a>, with Brown up 46-40 over Whitman. Whitman&#8217;s massive TV ad barrage may have backfired, with 50% of voters having an unfavorable opinion of her (30% are favorable). Like Boxer, Brown also leads among independents, 47-31.<\/p>\n<p>One reason why Whitman and Fiorina aren&#8217;t doing so well: Californians really do not like the idea of rich people buying public office. 52% think there should be a cap on how much money a candidate can give to their own campaign.<\/p>\n<p>If there&#8217;s any difference between the two races, it&#8217;s that Brown is doing a bit less well with his own party than Boxer is with Dems, or Whitman with Republicans. Boxer leads 77-13 among Dems, and Whitman has 76% of Republicans &#8211; but Jerry Brown has only 69% of Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>I can understand why some Democrats might not be enthused about Jerry Brown. Like I said earlier this week, the best we can hope for from him is an Obama-style presidency where we can have an opportunity to play offense. Brown will never be a progressive leader, and he will propose some things we&#8217;ll have to fight against.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s really no good excuse for Democrats to support anyone else, especially Meg Whitman, who is determined to destroy what remains of the California Dream and use the state as a launching pad for her own White House ambitions.<\/p>\n<p>Brown has to do some work to get Democrats to strongly back his campaign. And he needs to do much more to encourage Democrats to get engaged &#8211; running a &#8220;Rose Garden&#8221; campaign isn&#8217;t going to inspire the broad and deep California progressive grassroots to work to elect Brown and beat Whitman.<\/p>\n<p>But if that convergence does happen, the PPP poll suggests Meg Whitman might well spend $150 million on a losing effort. And that would be a very good outcome indeed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Public Policy Polling (PPP) has been polling California this week, and found some very favorable news for Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown.<\/p>\n<p>In their Senate polling, PPP found that <a href=\"http:\/\/publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com\/2010\/07\/boxers-expands-lead.html\">Boxer has a 49-40 lead over Fiorina<\/a>, up from 45-42 back in May. They also found that Fiorina&#8217;s negatives are rising, with 28% having a favorable view and 40% having an unfavorable view. Independent voters in particular have shifted against Fiorina, with Boxer leading there 48-38.<\/p>\n<p>Fiorina&#8217;s inept campaign and her desire to run as an extreme right-wing candidate, combined with her support of high unemployment and mass layoffs, means that if we continue to work hard, Boxer should be able to win this race.<\/p>\n<p>PPP found <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publicpolicypolling.com\/pdf\/PPP_Release_CA_728.pdf\">similar numbers for the governor&#8217;s race<\/a>, with Brown up 46-40 over Whitman. Whitman&#8217;s massive TV ad barrage may have backfired, with 50% of voters having an unfavorable opinion of her (30% are favorable). Like Boxer, Brown also leads among independents, 47-31.<\/p>\n<p>One reason why Whitman and Fiorina aren&#8217;t doing so well: Californians really do not like the idea of rich people buying public office. 52% think there should be a cap on how much money a candidate can give to their own campaign.<\/p>\n<p>If there&#8217;s any difference between the two races, it&#8217;s that Brown is doing a bit less well with his own party than Boxer is with Dems, or Whitman with Republicans. Boxer leads 77-13 among Dems, and Whitman has 76% of Republicans &#8211; but Jerry Brown has only 69% of Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>I can understand why some Democrats might not be enthused about Jerry Brown. Like I said earlier this week, the best we can hope for from him is an Obama-style presidency where we can have an opportunity to play offense. Brown will never be a progressive leader, and he will propose some things we&#8217;ll have to fight against.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s really no good excuse for Democrats to support anyone else, especially Meg Whitman, who is determined to destroy what remains of the California Dream and use the state as a launching pad for her own White House ambitions.<\/p>\n<p>Brown has to do some work to get Democrats to strongly back his campaign. And he needs to do much more to encourage Democrats to get engaged &#8211; running a &#8220;Rose Garden&#8221; campaign isn&#8217;t going to inspire the broad and deep California progressive grassroots to work to elect Brown and beat Whitman.<\/p>\n<p>But if that convergence does happen, the PPP poll suggests Meg Whitman might well spend $150 million on a losing effort. And that would be a very good outcome indeed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1990],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1990"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3aU","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}