{"id":12859,"date":"2010-11-17T23:12:31","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T23:12:31","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-11-17T23:12:31","modified_gmt":"2010-11-17T23:12:31","slug":"stopping-state-assetstripping","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/11\/17\/stopping-state-assetstripping\/","title":{"rendered":"Stopping State Asset-Stripping"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3509\/3953729023_9f540e3731_m.jpg\" align=right>And no, this time I&#8217;m <em>not<\/em> talking about TSA scanners. Instead I&#8217;m talking about the wasteful and very costly plan to raise money for the state budget by selling off state-owned office buildings, including the State Building in San Francisco seen at right. The State of California saves a lot of money by owning its own office space, but like a junkie looking for a quick buck and deciding to sell their car rather than get a job and generate new income, the state is going to sell it and ten other buildings in the hopes of raising $1.2 billion.<\/p>\n<p>After a state board controlled by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger&#8217;s appointees ruled in favor of the sale on Monday, two former officials fired by the governor for objecting to the sale <a href=\"http:\/\/sfappeal.com\/news\/2010\/11\/former-officials-sue-to-block-sale-of-state-buildings.php\">sued on Tuesday to block it<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The lawsuit claims the sale to a group of private investors, due to be completed in mid-December, is illegal and unconstitutional. It alleges the sale will cost taxpayers at least millions and possibly a billion dollars&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Their lawsuit has two legal claims.<\/p>\n<p>First, it alleges the sale of two court buildings violates a law giving the California Judicial Council authority and control over state appeals court facilities&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>The second claim is that the sale amounts to an unconstitutional gift of public funds.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Treasurer Bill Lockyer has opposed the plan, and today <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.sacbee.com\/capitolalertlatest\/2010\/11\/state-building-suit-causes-one.html\">delayed the sale of state bonds<\/a> because of the uncertainty caused by the suite:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Because the lawsuit came after the state advised investors of the known risks &#8211; and in the midst of this week&#8217;s bond sale &#8211; the Treasurer&#8217;s Office had to add a supplemental disclosure today and give investors the opportunity to rescind purchases made Monday and Tuesday&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If this lawsuit succeeds in creating a $1.2 billion hole in the budget, the state is still going to have ample cash to repay the (bonds) on time and in full,&#8221; Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar said. &#8220;And if the legal challenge is successful, it will give the governor and the Legislature an opportunity to adopt a smarter approach to come up with that money.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Lockyer sold 59% of the bonds that were offered on Monday and Tuesday, and there&#8217;s no reason to believe purchases will be rescinded or that future sales will be hurt &#8211; despite what some <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/california-default-2010-11\">foolish market analysts claim<\/a>, California is not at risk of default.<\/p>\n<p>Instead California would be taking a step to securing its finances by keeping these buildings. Selling them and then renting the space would be a waste of money, costing more in the long run than it would save in the short term &#8211; and thereby weakening state finances.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s hope this suit is successful and that Jerry Brown moves to stop the sale when he is inaugurated in January.<\/p>\n<p>(<I>Flickr image by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/wallyg\/3953729023\/\">wallyg<\/a><\/i>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3509\/3953729023_9f540e3731_m.jpg\" align=right>And no, this time I&#8217;m <em>not<\/em> talking about TSA scanners. Instead I&#8217;m talking about the wasteful and very costly plan to raise money for the state budget by selling off state-owned office buildings, including the State Building in San Francisco seen at right. The State of California saves a lot of money by owning its own office space, but like a junkie looking for a quick buck and deciding to sell their car rather than get a job and generate new income, the state is going to sell it and ten other buildings in the hopes of raising $1.2 billion.<\/p>\n<p>After a state board controlled by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger&#8217;s appointees ruled in favor of the sale on Monday, two former officials fired by the governor for objecting to the sale <a href=\"http:\/\/sfappeal.com\/news\/2010\/11\/former-officials-sue-to-block-sale-of-state-buildings.php\">sued on Tuesday to block it<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The lawsuit claims the sale to a group of private investors, due to be completed in mid-December, is illegal and unconstitutional. It alleges the sale will cost taxpayers at least millions and possibly a billion dollars&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Their lawsuit has two legal claims.<\/p>\n<p>First, it alleges the sale of two court buildings violates a law giving the California Judicial Council authority and control over state appeals court facilities&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>The second claim is that the sale amounts to an unconstitutional gift of public funds.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Treasurer Bill Lockyer has opposed the plan, and today <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.sacbee.com\/capitolalertlatest\/2010\/11\/state-building-suit-causes-one.html\">delayed the sale of state bonds<\/a> because of the uncertainty caused by the suite:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Because the lawsuit came after the state advised investors of the known risks &#8211; and in the midst of this week&#8217;s bond sale &#8211; the Treasurer&#8217;s Office had to add a supplemental disclosure today and give investors the opportunity to rescind purchases made Monday and Tuesday&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If this lawsuit succeeds in creating a $1.2 billion hole in the budget, the state is still going to have ample cash to repay the (bonds) on time and in full,&#8221; Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar said. &#8220;And if the legal challenge is successful, it will give the governor and the Legislature an opportunity to adopt a smarter approach to come up with that money.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Lockyer sold 59% of the bonds that were offered on Monday and Tuesday, and there&#8217;s no reason to believe purchases will be rescinded or that future sales will be hurt &#8211; despite what some <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/california-default-2010-11\">foolish market analysts claim<\/a>, California is not at risk of default.<\/p>\n<p>Instead California would be taking a step to securing its finances by keeping these buildings. Selling them and then renting the space would be a waste of money, costing more in the long run than it would save in the short term &#8211; and thereby weakening state finances.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s hope this suit is successful and that Jerry Brown moves to stop the sale when he is inaugurated in January.<\/p>\n<p>(<I>Flickr image by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/wallyg\/3953729023\/\">wallyg<\/a><\/i>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3lp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12859\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}