{"id":12870,"date":"2010-11-19T23:15:47","date_gmt":"2010-11-19T23:15:47","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2010-11-19T23:15:47","modified_gmt":"2010-11-19T23:15:47","slug":"the-americas-cup-in-san-francisco-a-net-positive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2010\/11\/19\/the-americas-cup-in-san-francisco-a-net-positive\/","title":{"rendered":"The America&#8217;s Cup in San Francisco: A Net Positive?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To be clear on one thing, bringing the America&#8217;s Cup to San Francisco would undoubtedly result in a lot of additional tourism dollars. &nbsp;A figure of between $0.7 and $1.2 billion has been tossed around. That&#8217;s nothing to really scoff at, even in a tourism rich economy like San Francisco.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s a catch with that. &nbsp;San Francisco is going to have to pay some big bucks to get the Cup here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>San Francisco, if selected, would spend $64.1 million on traffic management, environmental reviews, security and other event-related costs, according to the budget analyst&#8217;s report, which was provided in response to a request from Daly.<\/p>\n<p>The city is expected to recoup $22 million of those costs in taxes generated by increased visitor spending.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, that means that San Francisco, which has a current budget of $6.6 billion and is facing a $712 million projected budget shortfall next year, would spend $42.1 million hosting the Cup while city departments are being asked to slash costs, according to Rose.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the city would provide the team with $89.8 million worth of property and waterfront development rights, which would be partly recouped with $3.6 million in additional property taxes. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.baycitizen.org\/americas-cup\/story\/report-americas-cup-would-cost-san-128\/\">Bay Citizen<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, I am a big fan of sporting events. &nbsp;I go to a lot of Giants games during the season (I even used to live across the street from the stadium), and have been known to get a ticket for the odd football game too. &nbsp;However, I&#8217;m not such a big fan of governments paying to get the events. &nbsp;In the case of stadiums, I think it is pretty ridiculous that cities in the same metropolitan areas compete with each other. &nbsp;It is a race to the bottom, where the only real winner is a wealthy owner, and the loser is the taxpayer.<\/p>\n<p>You could argue a nationalistic point of view for the America&#8217;s cup (and other international events). &nbsp;At least we are bidding against other countries, but the point is that this is once again, the taxpayers (ie the middle class) bidding against each other to give money to a few wealthy profiteers. &nbsp;(In this case Oracle&#8217;s Larry Ellison)<\/p>\n<p>Would the Cup a) really net us that billion and b) be worth the expenditures necessary to get it? &nbsp;I&#8217;m not opposed to hosting these kinds of events, but I look at these things through a purely economic point of view. &nbsp;In other words, would the Cup be a net cost or a net gain for the city&#8217;s coffers. &nbsp;In this case, I&#8217;m just not sure the numbers really pencil out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To be clear on one thing, bringing the America&#8217;s Cup to San Francisco would undoubtedly result in a lot of additional tourism dollars. &nbsp;A figure of between $0.7 and $1.2 billion has been tossed around. That&#8217;s nothing to really scoff at, even in a tourism rich economy like San Francisco.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s a catch with that. &nbsp;San Francisco is going to have to pay some big bucks to get the Cup here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>San Francisco, if selected, would spend $64.1 million on traffic management, environmental reviews, security and other event-related costs, according to the budget analyst&#8217;s report, which was provided in response to a request from Daly.<\/p>\n<p>The city is expected to recoup $22 million of those costs in taxes generated by increased visitor spending.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, that means that San Francisco, which has a current budget of $6.6 billion and is facing a $712 million projected budget shortfall next year, would spend $42.1 million hosting the Cup while city departments are being asked to slash costs, according to Rose.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the city would provide the team with $89.8 million worth of property and waterfront development rights, which would be partly recouped with $3.6 million in additional property taxes. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.baycitizen.org\/americas-cup\/story\/report-americas-cup-would-cost-san-128\/\">Bay Citizen<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, I am a big fan of sporting events. &nbsp;I go to a lot of Giants games during the season (I even used to live across the street from the stadium), and have been known to get a ticket for the odd football game too. &nbsp;However, I&#8217;m not such a big fan of governments paying to get the events. &nbsp;In the case of stadiums, I think it is pretty ridiculous that cities in the same metropolitan areas compete with each other. &nbsp;It is a race to the bottom, where the only real winner is a wealthy owner, and the loser is the taxpayer.<\/p>\n<p>You could argue a nationalistic point of view for the America&#8217;s cup (and other international events). &nbsp;At least we are bidding against other countries, but the point is that this is once again, the taxpayers (ie the middle class) bidding against each other to give money to a few wealthy profiteers. &nbsp;(In this case Oracle&#8217;s Larry Ellison)<\/p>\n<p>Would the Cup a) really net us that billion and b) be worth the expenditures necessary to get it? &nbsp;I&#8217;m not opposed to hosting these kinds of events, but I look at these things through a purely economic point of view. &nbsp;In other words, would the Cup be a net cost or a net gain for the city&#8217;s coffers. &nbsp;In this case, I&#8217;m just not sure the numbers really pencil out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[69],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-69"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3lA","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}