{"id":13109,"date":"2011-02-04T21:20:18","date_gmt":"2011-02-04T21:20:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-02-04T21:20:18","modified_gmt":"2011-02-04T21:20:18","slug":"republicans-play-pretend-while-budget-crisis-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/04\/republicans-play-pretend-while-budget-crisis-continues\/","title":{"rendered":"Republicans Play Pretend While Budget Crisis Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><object width=\"150\" height=\"40\" align=right><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/listen.grooveshark.com\/songWidget.swf\" \/><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"window\" \/><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"hostname=cowbell.grooveshark.com&#038;widgetID=23372383&#038;style=water&#038;p=0\" \/><\/object>With the Governor&#8217;s budget proposal, there are any number of tragedies, big and small. &nbsp;Despite that fact, the Republicans continue to pretend that <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/13096\/gop-might-consider-putting-tax-increases-on-ballot-if-tax-decreases-are-too\">somehow tax cuts are some sort of serious proposal<\/a>. &nbsp;And no, sorry, no matter how many times you repeat &#8220;tax cuts pay for themselves&#8221;, that won&#8217;t make it true. In fact, a 2005 CBO Report showed that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbo.gov\/ftpdocs\/69xx\/doc6908\/12-01-10PercentTaxCut.pdf\">at most 28% of revenue lost to tax cuts returns to the federal budget through growth<\/a>.) <\/p>\n<p>But this budget, even with Brown&#8217;s &#8220;halfway solution,&#8221; would still net some draconian cuts. &nbsp;For example, look at the suggested $750 million of cuts to the developmentally disabled:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Most areas of Brown&#8217;s budget proposal include specific reductions, but the plan lists only $216.5 million in detailed cuts in the Department of Developmental Services. The budget asks for another $533.5 million in unspecified reductions, with the department expected to come up with ideas by the end of March.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think we need to really look at the issue in a more full manner than just say, &#8216;We&#8217;re going to have an arbitrary number put into the cuts,'&#8221; Assemblyman Jim Beall, D-San Jose, said at a legislative hearing Thursday. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think people with developmental disabilities deserve that.&#8221;(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/2011\/02\/04\/3376550\/jerry-browns-budget-plan-too-vague.html#ixzz1D1NVVqC6\">SacBee<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are two competing interests in how you make cuts. &nbsp;First, if you tell departments how much the cut will be, and then tell them to make it, you are likely to get somewhat more knowledgeable cuts. &nbsp;Of course, this may lead to the preservation of personnel over services. &nbsp;However, if you give specific cuts, at least there is some idea of what&#8217;s going to happen.<\/p>\n<p>But when you give over half a billion of unspecified cuts? Well, frankly it is too much to balance out even with the most severe of cuts. &nbsp;Adding another $12 Billion of cuts would essentially require the closing of our prison system and higher education. &nbsp;It simply isn&#8217;t a serious solution. &nbsp;Adding additional tax cuts would put us on the path to Somliaization.<\/p>\n<p>And as Skelton referenced yesterday, our initiative system is broken. &nbsp;We are asking our voters to make micro decisions on issues that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/01\/30\/us\/30bcweber.html?_r=2&#038;src=twrhp\">they just don&#8217;t understand<\/a>. Perhaps that could be construed as elitist, but honestly, how many people really have the time to think about tax policy decisions? &nbsp;Legislators take months of time to discuss and analyze the issue, but voters are supposed to do it in five minutes at the ballot box?<\/p>\n<p>At the very least, Brown has given up the ghost of stupid budget tricks. &nbsp;Perhaps the Republicans can join him in the real world as well?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><object width=\"150\" height=\"40\" align=right><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/listen.grooveshark.com\/songWidget.swf\" \/><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"window\" \/><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"hostname=cowbell.grooveshark.com&#038;widgetID=23372383&#038;style=water&#038;p=0\" \/><embed src=\"http:\/\/listen.grooveshark.com\/songWidget.swf\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"150\" height=\"40\" align=right flashvars=\"hostname=cowbell.grooveshark.com&#038;widgetID=23372383&#038;style=water&#038;p=0\" allowScriptAccess=\"always\" wmode=\"window\" \/><\/object>With the Governor&#8217;s budget proposal, there are any number of tragedies, big and small. &nbsp;Despite that fact, the Republicans continue to pretend that <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/13096\/gop-might-consider-putting-tax-increases-on-ballot-if-tax-decreases-are-too\">somehow tax cuts are some sort of serious proposal<\/a>. &nbsp;And no, sorry, no matter how many times you repeat &#8220;tax cuts pay for themselves&#8221;, that won&#8217;t make it true. In fact, a 2005 CBO Report showed that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbo.gov\/ftpdocs\/69xx\/doc6908\/12-01-10PercentTaxCut.pdf\">at most 28% of revenue lost to tax cuts returns to the federal budget through growth<\/a>.) <\/p>\n<p>But this budget, even with Brown&#8217;s &#8220;halfway solution,&#8221; would still net some draconian cuts. &nbsp;For example, look at the suggested $750 million of cuts to the developmentally disabled:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Most areas of Brown&#8217;s budget proposal include specific reductions, but the plan lists only $216.5 million in detailed cuts in the Department of Developmental Services. The budget asks for another $533.5 million in unspecified reductions, with the department expected to come up with ideas by the end of March.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think we need to really look at the issue in a more full manner than just say, &#8216;We&#8217;re going to have an arbitrary number put into the cuts,'&#8221; Assemblyman Jim Beall, D-San Jose, said at a legislative hearing Thursday. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think people with developmental disabilities deserve that.&#8221;(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/2011\/02\/04\/3376550\/jerry-browns-budget-plan-too-vague.html#ixzz1D1NVVqC6\">SacBee<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are two competing interests in how you make cuts. &nbsp;First, if you tell departments how much the cut will be, and then tell them to make it, you are likely to get somewhat more knowledgeable cuts. &nbsp;Of course, this may lead to the preservation of personnel over services. &nbsp;However, if you give specific cuts, at least there is some idea of what&#8217;s going to happen.<\/p>\n<p>But when you give over half a billion of unspecified cuts? Well, frankly it is too much to balance out even with the most severe of cuts. &nbsp;Adding another $12 Billion of cuts would essentially require the closing of our prison system and higher education. &nbsp;It simply isn&#8217;t a serious solution. &nbsp;Adding additional tax cuts would put us on the path to Somliaization.<\/p>\n<p>And as Skelton referenced yesterday, our initiative system is broken. &nbsp;We are asking our voters to make micro decisions on issues that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/01\/30\/us\/30bcweber.html?_r=2&#038;src=twrhp\">they just don&#8217;t understand<\/a>. Perhaps that could be construed as elitist, but honestly, how many people really have the time to think about tax policy decisions? &nbsp;Legislators take months of time to discuss and analyze the issue, but voters are supposed to do it in five minutes at the ballot box?<\/p>\n<p>At the very least, Brown has given up the ghost of stupid budget tricks. &nbsp;Perhaps the Republicans can join him in the real world as well?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[117],"tags":[4613],"class_list":["post-13109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-4613"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3pr","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}