{"id":13709,"date":"2011-07-21T20:20:39","date_gmt":"2011-07-21T20:20:39","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-07-21T20:20:39","modified_gmt":"2011-07-21T20:20:39","slug":"prop-14-and-party-endorsements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2011\/07\/21\/prop-14-and-party-endorsements\/","title":{"rendered":"Prop 14 and Party Endorsements"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>So-called &#8220;Top 2&#8221; primary makes intraparty general elections possible<\/i><\/p>\n<p>by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n<p>The top-2 primary system yields some strange results. &nbsp;You could end up with two members of the same party. &nbsp;Or you could end up with a non-major party candidate in the top 2. &nbsp;Both of these situations lead to some uncomfortable questions for the party. &nbsp;Under the current rules, party entities are not allowed to endorse non-democrats. &nbsp;However, if there are no Democrats in the general election, what then? &nbsp;CDP Chair John Burton just released an email about his take on the &#8220;top 2&#8221; primary system and independents. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What are we to do if a &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; supports the issues we do and shares our values as Democrats? I personally know several people who became &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; in opposition to Iraq and Afghanistan, but favor environmental protection, gay rights, and other progressive issues. If local Democrats are presented with a dilemma of a progressive declined-to-state vs. a reactionary Republican in the run off election, I believe the local delegates should have the option of whether to endorse.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The July Executive Board meeting happening next weekend will deal with these issues. &nbsp;The changes proposed by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cadem.org\/admin\/miscdocs\/files\/PendingBylaws-0711.pdf\">CDP Rules committee can be found here (PDF<\/a>. In short, the rules changes allow a DTS voter to apply to get an endorsement where there are no Democrats on the ballot.<\/p>\n<p>Take a look at the changes, there is a lot to think about. &nbsp;I&#8217;m pretty inclined to support this, but I&#8217;d like to hear others&#8217; thoughts. Full email over the flip.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dear Brian:<br \/>\n<br \/>One of the issues before our Executive Board later this month deals with how the Party handles endorsements in a post-Prop 14 (Top-Two Primary) world.<\/p>\n<p>One of the items we grappled with in this process is what to do with regard to endorsements if no Democrat makes the run off.<\/p>\n<p>What are we to do if a &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; supports the issues we do and shares our values as Democrats? I personally know several people who became &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; in opposition to Iraq and Afghanistan, but favor environmental protection, gay rights, and other progressive issues. If local Democrats are presented with a dilemma of a progressive declined-to-state vs. a reactionary Republican in the run off election, I believe the local delegates should have the option of whether to endorse.<\/p>\n<p>It is far fetched, but a possibility, that a Senator Bernie Sanders type of decline-to-state candidate could be running against a Wally Herger or Tom McClintock in the run off. Should the locals not be given the option to decide to endorse or not endorse the &#8220;DTS&#8221; candidate? Some say that it would be just as effective to say that we oppose right-wing Republicans. I personally disagree. I don&#8217;t think you can beat somebody with nobody.<\/p>\n<p>I truly believe that it is in the best interest of the principles we believe in as Democrats to at least have the option of deciding in those rare instances when a progressive DTS is running against a reactionary Republican.<\/p>\n<p>I look forward to finalizing this matter in Anaheim on the weekend of July 29-31. If you have any questions, feel free to call on me.<\/p>\n<p>Peace and friendship,<\/p>\n<p>John<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>So-called &#8220;Top 2&#8221; primary makes intraparty general elections possible<\/i><\/p>\n<p>by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n<p>The top-2 primary system yields some strange results. &nbsp;You could end up with two members of the same party. &nbsp;Or you could end up with a non-major party candidate in the top 2. &nbsp;Both of these situations lead to some uncomfortable questions for the party. &nbsp;Under the current rules, party entities are not allowed to endorse non-democrats. &nbsp;However, if there are no Democrats in the general election, what then? &nbsp;CDP Chair John Burton just released an email about his take on the &#8220;top 2&#8221; primary system and independents. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What are we to do if a &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; supports the issues we do and shares our values as Democrats? I personally know several people who became &#8220;Decline-to-State&#8221; in opposition to Iraq and Afghanistan, but favor environmental protection, gay rights, and other progressive issues. If local Democrats are presented with a dilemma of a progressive declined-to-state vs. a reactionary Republican in the run off election, I believe the local delegates should have the option of whether to endorse.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The July Executive Board meeting happening next weekend will deal with these issues. &nbsp;The changes proposed by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cadem.org\/admin\/miscdocs\/files\/PendingBylaws-0711.pdf\">CDP Rules committee can be found here (PDF<\/a>. In short, the rules changes allow a DTS voter to apply to get an endorsement where there are no Democrats on the ballot.<\/p>\n<p>Take a look at the changes, there is a lot to think about. &nbsp;I&#8217;m pretty inclined to support this, but I&#8217;d like to hear others&#8217; thoughts. Full email over the flip.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[1206,301,8536],"class_list":["post-13709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-1206","tag-301","tag-8536"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3z7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}