{"id":13844,"date":"2011-09-12T21:32:07","date_gmt":"2011-09-12T21:32:07","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-09-12T21:32:07","modified_gmt":"2011-09-12T21:32:07","slug":"mercury-insurance-returns-to-the-prop-17-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2011\/09\/12\/mercury-insurance-returns-to-the-prop-17-well\/","title":{"rendered":"Mercury Insurance Returns to the Prop 17 Well"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Insurer trying to pass measure previously defeated last June<\/i><\/p>\n<p>by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure what Mercury Insurance Chairman George Joseph thinks will be more in his favor come next November, but he&#8217;s looking to qualify a measure stunningly similar to last year&#8217;s loser, Prop 17. Today Joseph was revealed as <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.sacbee.com\/capitolalertlatest\/2011\/09\/mercury-chairman-pumps-8-milli.html\">having donated over $8mil<\/a> towards qualifying Prop 17&#8217;s virtual clone.<\/p>\n<p>The current proposal, like Proposition 17, would repeal Proposition 103&#8217;s ban on considering a driver&#8217;s insurance coverage history when setting rates and premiums. &nbsp;It would allow insurers to surcharge customers who had not purchased auto insurance at some point during the past five years, whether or not they had been driving. &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/\">Consumer Watchdog<\/a> estimates that those surcharges would increase premiums by as much as 40% or more for millions of Californians including students who went away for college, Californians who previously used mass-transit, and the long-term unemployed.\u2028 \u2028<\/p>\n<p>It was a bad idea in 2010, and it is a bad idea in 2012. &nbsp;While June 2012 might seem an inviting target for ambitious corporatisits, that is a risky gambit considering the legislation on the Governor&#8217;s desk that would restore all future signature driven measures to the general election ballot. November 2012 will not really be the opportunity to pass already-rejected crap, but it looks like Mercury Insurance will take that bet.<\/p>\n<p>Because, they want to save you money, don&#8217;t you know?!?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Insurer trying to pass measure previously defeated last June<\/i><\/p>\n<p>by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure what Mercury Insurance Chairman George Joseph thinks will be more in his favor come next November, but he&#8217;s looking to qualify a measure stunningly similar to last year&#8217;s loser, Prop 17. Today Joseph was revealed as <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.sacbee.com\/capitolalertlatest\/2011\/09\/mercury-chairman-pumps-8-milli.html\">having donated over $8mil<\/a> towards qualifying Prop 17&#8217;s virtual clone.<\/p>\n<p>The current proposal, like Proposition 17, would repeal Proposition 103&#8217;s ban on considering a driver&#8217;s insurance coverage history when setting rates and premiums. &nbsp;It would allow insurers to surcharge customers who had not purchased auto insurance at some point during the past five years, whether or not they had been driving. &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/\">Consumer Watchdog<\/a> estimates that those surcharges would increase premiums by as much as 40% or more for millions of Californians including students who went away for college, Californians who previously used mass-transit, and the long-term unemployed.\u2028 \u2028<\/p>\n<p>It was a bad idea in 2010, and it is a bad idea in 2012. &nbsp;While June 2012 might seem an inviting target for ambitious corporatisits, that is a risky gambit considering the legislation on the Governor&#8217;s desk that would restore all future signature driven measures to the general election ballot. November 2012 will not really be the opportunity to pass already-rejected crap, but it looks like Mercury Insurance will take that bet.<\/p>\n<p>Because, they want to save you money, don&#8217;t you know?!?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[259,2800,79,8321],"class_list":["post-13844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-259","tag-2800","tag-79","tag-8321"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3Bi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13844\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}