{"id":13943,"date":"2011-10-14T01:22:19","date_gmt":"2011-10-14T01:22:19","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-10-14T01:22:19","modified_gmt":"2011-10-14T01:22:19","slug":"blue-shield-admits-to-overcharging-california-customers-by-about-half-a-billion-since-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2011\/10\/14\/blue-shield-admits-to-overcharging-california-customers-by-about-half-a-billion-since-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Blue Shield admits to overcharging California customers by about half a billion since 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/blue-shield-of-california-to-give-back-295-million-to-fulfill-2-percent-net-income-pledge-for-2011-2011-10-13\">masterful spin by the self-described not-for-profit Blue Shield of California<\/a> to announce that it is returning all but two percent of its profits to its customers, as though this were some act of humble generosity.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a little like a supermarket announcing that from now on it&rsquo;s going to give back (almost) all of your change.&nbsp; (It&rsquo;s actually worse than that, as I&rsquo;ll explain.)<\/p>\n<p>It is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/blue-shield-of-california-to-give-back-295-million-to-fulfill-2-percent-net-income-pledge-for-2011-2011-10-13\">masterful spin by the self-described not-for-profit Blue Shield of California<\/a> to announce that it is returning all but two percent of its profits to its customers, as though this were some act of humble generosity.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a little like a supermarket announcing that from now on it&rsquo;s going to give back (almost) all of your change.&nbsp; (It&rsquo;s actually worse than that, as I&rsquo;ll explain.)<\/p>\n<p>\tAll told, Blue Shield will have returned about $475 million in profits &#8211; $283 million that Blue Shield is crediting back in December plus about $167 million credited back earlier in the year for 2010 premiums as well as the $25 million the company distributed to doctors, hospitals and an as yet unnamed &ldquo;community investment.&rdquo;&nbsp; But this should not be thought of as a sincere gift from a community-oriented nonprofit.&nbsp; Rather, it&rsquo;s nearly half a billion dollars that Blue Shield overcharged its policyholders and then held onto for months. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\tWorse still, Blue Shield had to be pushed and prodded to do anything; this refund didn&#39;t just happen.&nbsp; Blue Shield is only giving some money back because there was huge public pressure this year &ndash; from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/story\/fed-calif-officials-vow-fight-blue-shield-hike\">Califo<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/story\/fed-calif-officials-vow-fight-blue-shield-hike\">rnia Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones<\/a>, from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/video\/kgotv-rally-blue-shield-headquarters-results-60-day-delay-rate-hikes\">nurses and consumers who protested at their corporate offices<\/a>, from lawmakers like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/story\/anthem-blue-cross-delays-premium-co-pay-hikes-calif-estimated-40-million-savings\">Assemblyman Mike Feuer carrying legislation to regulate insurance companies<\/a> and from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/story\/blue-shield-ceo-bruce-bodaken-earned-46-million-last-year\">news reporters investigating their rates and salaries<\/a>. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\tWhat&rsquo;s more, the $283 million that will go to reducing policyholders&rsquo; December premium payments is utter chump change when given a full context:<\/p>\n<p>Blue Shield, according to documents it files with the state of California, has more than $3 billion in excess surplus (&ldquo;Tangible Net Equity excess&rdquo; is the formal term).&nbsp; That massive and ever growing pot of money is a profit account that Blue Shield uses to take policyholder premium out of the healthcare system so they can come back and charge those same policyholders high rates again next year.&nbsp; Blue Shield could give back $280 million a month for an entire year and still have a enough money on hand to run a stable insurance company.&nbsp; Or, to think of it a little differently, instead of giving families back a few hundred dollars for Christmas, they could just sell insurance at a reasonable premium and not stuff their own stockings with surplus.<\/p>\n<p>\tTo be sure, Blue Shield is angling for a feel good story it can tell politicians and voters when they next consider whether to enact a law or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\/story\/health-care-measure-seeks-public-option-rollbacks\">initiative<\/a> regulating the premiums health insurance companies can charge.&nbsp; That story may work with some politicians in Sacramento, but I doubt voters who are stuck overpaying for health insurance will be so easily spun.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Doug Heller is the Executive Director of Consumer Watchdog. Visit our website at: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerwatchdog.org\">www.ConsumerWatchdog.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/blue-shield-of-california-to-give-back-295-million-to-fulfill-2-percent-net-income-pledge-for-2011-2011-10-13\">masterful spin by the self-described not-for-profit Blue Shield of California<\/a> to announce that it is returning all but two percent of its profits to its customers, as though this were some act of humble generosity.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a little like a supermarket announcing that from now on it&rsquo;s going to give back (almost) all of your change.&nbsp; (It&rsquo;s actually worse than that, as I&rsquo;ll explain.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5526,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[3540,8878,2001,67,844],"class_list":["post-13943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-22","tag-3540","tag-8878","tag-2001","tag-67","tag-844"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3CT","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5526"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13943\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}