Measure would put maps on the ballot in June, leave 2012 districts to the Courts<\/i><\/p>\n
by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n
As I’ve mentioned here in the past<\/a>, the Senate maps aren’t so much biased, as no longer crazy incumbent protection rackets. And with that risk, the Republicans face the very real risk of losing their 1\/3 superminority and thus becoming pretty much irrelevant. I’ve outlined many of the complexities<\/a> of the situations if the measure does qualify, but let’s go with complicated.<\/p>\n But that is a big if at this point. Scott Lay in his wonderful Nooner daily email<\/a> laid out the situation for qualification:<\/p>\n As expected, the referendum of the state senate plan met the raw count requirement. With 51 counties reporting, 697,392 signatures were counted. Now, counties have until January 10 to conduct and report a random sample for validity. If fewer than 95% of the 504,760 required signatures are projected to be valid, the referendum fails. If the projection exceeds 110% of the required signatures, it qualifies. In between, it proceeds to a full count.<\/p>\n This will be a nail-biter, with the validity of the 209,163 signatures from Los Angeles likely being make-or-break. In contrast, paycheck protection\/deception is on track to qualify with 920,569 signatures and a 70% validity rate (before Los Angeles has reported). Carrying forward the trend, it will have 648,000 signatures and won’t need a full count. To avoid failure, redistricting petitions need 68.8% validity in the random sample. With 79.6% validity, a full count will be avoided. If a full count occurs, actual validity of 72.4% would be needed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Typical validity rates are between 70 and 77 percent, so while the low-end 68.8 will likely be met, there is no guarantee. A full count could mean that we don’t know whether this will be on the ballot until March. At which point, it would be nearly impossible to draw up some new set of maps. At this point, it seems tough to imagine a situation where we aren’t voting on the commission’s maps. If the June referendum winds up somehow tossing the maps out…well, more fun will surely ensue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Measure would put maps on the ballot in June, leave 2012 districts to the Courts<\/i><\/p>\n by Brian Leubitz<\/p>\n As I’ve mentioned here in the past<\/a>, the Senate maps aren’t so much biased, as no longer crazy incumbent protection rackets. And with that risk, the Republicans face the very real risk of losing their 1\/3 superminority and thus becoming pretty much irrelevant. I’ve outlined many of the complexities<\/a> of the situations if the measure does qualify, but let’s go with complicated.<\/p>\n