{"id":14094,"date":"2012-01-05T19:51:21","date_gmt":"2012-01-05T19:51:21","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2012-01-05T19:51:21","modified_gmt":"2012-01-05T19:51:21","slug":"efforts-to-derail-bullet-train-driven-by-politics-as-usual","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2012\/01\/05\/efforts-to-derail-bullet-train-driven-by-politics-as-usual\/","title":{"rendered":"Efforts to Derail Bullet Train Driven by Politics as Usual"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>by Steve Smith, California Labor Federation<\/p>\n<p> \tAmong the big political news this week was the release of the  Legislative Peer Review Group&rsquo;s report on the California high-speed rail  project. The report recommends that the state freezes the project &ldquo;at  this time&rdquo; until further assessment is done on its long-term  feasibility. Problem is, the report was completed with minimal  consultation with the California High-Speed Rail Authority, and ignored  many of the details on feasibility included in the Authority&rsquo;s recent  business plan.<\/p>\n<p> \tOpponents seized on the erroneous report to further their campaign to  derail the project. While it might make good politics for some  conservatives to oppose a signature program of the Obama White House, it  certainly doesn&rsquo;t make for good policy. Halting the high-speed rail  project at this critical stage would jeopardize the entire project. It  would put billions in federal funding at risk, and sap the state of an  important engine to create desperately needed jobs.<\/p>\n<p> \tThe debate on high-speed rail &ndash; like so many other issues these days &#8212;  has become overly politicized and isn&rsquo;t on the merits. A group of  conservative Republicans wants to put the issue back on the ballot, even  though <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/California_Proposition_1A_%282008%29\">voters have already approved $9 billion<\/a>  in state bonds for high-speed rail. Even the peer review group, which  is balanced and supports the concept of high-speed rail, got many  pertinent facts wrong in its report.<\/p>\n<p> \tWith respect to the project, it&rsquo;s time we got back to basics. Many countries around the world, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnngo.com\/shanghai\/play\/complete-guide-chinas-high-speed-rail-038363\">including China<\/a>,  are showing that high-speed rail is an important component to the  future of transportation. It&rsquo;s clean, environmentally friendly,  efficient, convenient and affordable. It alleviates traffic and air  congestion while giving passengers an important option to meet their  travel needs. In California, the project also offers an enormous  opportunity to give our struggling economy a boost, especially in areas  hard hit by the recession like the Central Valley. Over the life of the  project, as many as <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.aflcio.org\/2010\/04\/02\/coming-soon-high-speed-rail-and-750000-new-jobs\/\">750,000 jobs<\/a> would be created.<\/p>\n<p> \tThe project is supported by Republicans, Democrats and Independents. On its merits, it makes perfect sense. And the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov\/\">California High-Speed Rail Authority (HSRA)<\/a>, after early missteps, now has its act together and has delivered a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov\/Business_Plan_reports.aspx\">detailed and transparent plan<\/a>  to bring the project to fruition. Gov. Brown has infused the HSRA board  with seasoned experts, like Dan Richard and Mike Rossi, who bring years  of experience in transportation planning and finance.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p> \tCalifornia Labor Federation Executive Secretary Treasurer Art Pulaski:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> \t\tWith California facing a jobs crisis and an urgency to upgrade our  failing transportation infrastructure, further delay in breaking ground  on high-speed rail is neither prudent nor responsible. Any project  that&rsquo;s the size and scope of high-speed rail is bound to encounter  difficulties along the way. But rather than working to implement the  vision of high-speed rail, the peer review panel suggests derailing the  project at a critical stage, which is not a viable solution for  California. Under new leadership, the California High-Speed Rail  Authority is headed in the right direction. The Authority&rsquo;s business  plan addresses the myriad issues facing high-speed rail in a thoughtful  and thorough way.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> \tThe main hurdle for high-speed rail right now isn&rsquo;t the project&rsquo;s  feasibility. It&rsquo;s that the project has been enveloped in politics as  usual. That&rsquo;s why it&rsquo;s critical that the legislature take all evidence  into account, listen to the experts and carefully analyze the  Authority&rsquo;s business plan, which answers many of the questions raised by  the peer review group.<\/p>\n<p> \tOne such expert is the new CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov\/pr_01032012.aspx\">Roelof van Ark<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> \t\tIt is unfortunate that the Peer Review Committee has delivered a  report to the Legislature that is deeply flawed in its understanding of  the Authority&rsquo;s program and the experience around the world in  successfully developing high speed rail.&nbsp;&nbsp; As someone involved in many  of the successful high speed rail programs internationally, I can say  that the recommendations of this Committee simply do not reflect a real  world view of what it takes to bring such projects to fruition.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> \tThat&rsquo;s not to say that ongoing issues, including long-term funding of  the project, shouldn&rsquo;t be addressed. But bowing to political hype to  scuttle the project instead of carefully considering issues and finding  solutions to work through them, would be a huge mistake.<\/p>\n<p> \tThe California labor movement supports high-speed rail because it holds  more promise to transform our state&rsquo;s economy, protect our environment  and create a better quality of life for our families than any public  works project in generations.<\/p>\n<p> \tCalifornia was built by visionaries. It&rsquo;s a proud tradition and  important part of our heritage that we, as Californians, collectively  embrace. Despite the challenges facing our state, it isn&rsquo;t the time to  shrink from the vision of high-speed rail. The bullet train can and must  be built.<\/p>\n<p> \tPulaski:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> \t\tIn the short term, the project will create thousands of desperately  needed jobs to help lift our state out of economic morass. In the long  term, high-speed rail will deliver a world-class, environmentally  friendly transportation system that will transform our state. An  investment in high-speed rail is an investment in our state&rsquo;s future.  The Legislature must grant voter-approved bonds so that work can begin  on the project this year.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Steve Smith, California Labor Federation<\/p>\n<p> \tAmong the big political news this week was the release of the  Legislative Peer Review Group&rsquo;s report on the California high-speed rail  project. The report recommends that the state freezes the project &ldquo;at  this time&rdquo; until further assessment is done on its long-term  feasibility. Problem is, the report was completed with minimal  consultation with the California High-Speed Rail Authority, and ignored  many of the details on feasibility included in the Authority&rsquo;s recent  business plan.<\/p>\n<p> \tOpponents seized on the erroneous report to further their campaign to  derail the project. While it might make good politics for some  conservatives to oppose a signature program of the Obama White House, it  certainly doesn&rsquo;t make for good policy. Halting the high-speed rail  project at this critical stage would jeopardize the entire project. It  would put billions in federal funding at risk, and sap the state of an  important engine to create desperately needed jobs.<\/p>\n<p> \tThe debate on high-speed rail &ndash; like so many other issues these days &#8212;  has become overly politicized and isn&rsquo;t on the merits. A group of  conservative Republicans wants to put the issue back on the ballot, even  though <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/California_Proposition_1A_%282008%29\">voters have already approved $9 billion<\/a>  in state bonds for high-speed rail. Even the peer review group, which  is balanced and supports the concept of high-speed rail, got many  pertinent facts wrong in its report.<\/p>\n<p> \tWith respect to the project, it&rsquo;s time we got back to basics. Many countries around the world, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnngo.com\/shanghai\/play\/complete-guide-chinas-high-speed-rail-038363\">including China<\/a>,  are showing that high-speed rail is an important component to the  future of transportation. It&rsquo;s clean, environmentally friendly,  efficient, convenient and affordable. It alleviates traffic and air  congestion while giving passengers an important option to meet their  travel needs. In California, the project also offers an enormous  opportunity to give our struggling economy a boost, especially in areas  hard hit by the recession like the Central Valley. Over the life of the  project, as many as <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.aflcio.org\/2010\/04\/02\/coming-soon-high-speed-rail-and-750000-new-jobs\/\">750,000 jobs<\/a> would be created.<\/p>\n<p> \tThe project is supported by Republicans, Democrats and Independents. On its merits, it makes perfect sense. And the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov\/\">California High-Speed Rail Authority (HSRA)<\/a>, after early missteps, now has its act together and has delivered a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov\/Business_Plan_reports.aspx\">detailed and transparent plan<\/a>  to bring the project to fruition. Gov. Brown has infused the HSRA board  with seasoned experts, like Dan Richard and Mike Rossi, who bring years  of experience in transportation planning and finance.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2360,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[2254,10324,2681,138,5718],"class_list":["post-14094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-2254","tag-10324","tag-2681","tag-138","tag-5718"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-3Fk","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2360"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}