{"id":8386,"date":"2009-03-26T16:09:26","date_gmt":"2009-03-26T16:09:26","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-03-26T16:09:26","modified_gmt":"2009-03-26T16:09:26","slug":"ppic-poll-the-special-election-is-going-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/03\/26\/ppic-poll-the-special-election-is-going-down\/","title":{"rendered":"PPIC Poll: The Special Election Is Going Down"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I think the state legislature and the Governor might want to try the tactic of opposing the May 19 ballot initiatives, because apparently, anything they support, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ppic.org\/content\/pubs\/survey\/S_309MBS.pdf\">public does the opposite<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When read the full text of the ballot measures, likely voters express these preferences: <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1A: About four in 10 support the measure (39% yes, 46% no, 15% undecided) to change the<br \/>\n<br \/>budget process by increasing the state &#8220;rainy day&#8221; fund. Less than half say the measure would be very (7%)<br \/>\n<br \/>or somewhat (38%) effective in helping California avoid future state budget deficits. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1B: They are divided (44% yes, 41% no, 15% undecided) on the initiative that would require future<br \/>\n<br \/>supplemental payments to local school districts and community colleges to address recent budget cuts. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1C: Half oppose (37% yes, 50% no, 11% undecided) the measure to modernize the lottery and<br \/>\n<br \/>allow for $5 billion in borrowing from future lottery profits to help balance next year&#8217;s state budget. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1D: Nearly half support (48% yes, 36% no, 16% undecided) the proposition to temporarily transfer<br \/>\n<br \/>funds from early childhood education to help balance the state budget. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1E: Nearly half favor (47% yes, 37% no, 16% undecided) the measure to transfer money from<br \/>\n<br \/>mental health services to the general fund to help balance the state budget.<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1F: An overwhelming majority (81% yes, 13% no, 6% undecided) support the initiative that would<br \/>\n<br \/>block pay increases to state elected officials in years of budget deficit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Keep in mind that the first poll, taken about a month ago, showed all six measures passing by a fairly decent margin. &nbsp;And there has been no coordinated opposition. &nbsp;So what changed? &nbsp;I&#8217;d gather the confidence in the legislature and the Governor has completely collapsed:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Eight weeks before the special election-called as part of the 2009-2010 budget agreement between the governor and legislature-those Californians most likely to go to the polls are feeling grim about the state of their state: The vast majority (77%) say it is headed in the wrong direction and see its fiscal situation as a big problem (85%). They give record low ratings to the legislature (11%) and to their own legislators (29%). Their approval rating for Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (33%) has dropped to a new low among likely voters. For the first time, a majority of Republican likely voters (54%) disapprove of the job performance of the Republican governor. <\/p>\n<p>The results are striking when compared to rising approval ratings for Congress and California&#8217;s senators and to &nbsp;<br \/>\n<br \/>a strongly positive view of President Obama-despite a challenging economic climate. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Californians are clear that the budget situation is serious, but most disapprove of the leadership in<br \/>\n<br \/>Sacramento-the people who are providing the solutions,&#8221; says Mark Baldassare, PPIC president, CEO, and<br \/>\n<br \/>survey director. &#8220;These leaders have their work cut out for them if they want to persuade voters that the ballot<br \/>\n<br \/>measures are necessary to address the problem.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If you want to know why the Governor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-arnold25-2009mar25,0,4205725.story?track=rss\">had to explain that he&#8217;s not running for future office<\/a>, that would be because nobody likes him. &nbsp;And the legislature, obviously, is even worse &#8211; the 29% rating for people&#8217;s local legislator is absurdly low and quite dangerous. &nbsp;In a normal world, that would spell lots of primary challenges.<\/p>\n<p>Let me stress that this election is not over &#8211; the opposition still isn&#8217;t well-funded, and the CTA just <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/021024.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">put $2 million into Prop. 1B<\/a>. &nbsp;The Governor has already started funding the other measures. &nbsp;With an unbalanced funding war, these measures could bounce back. &nbsp;But the rule of thumb is that measures in this position right now lose. &nbsp;I see 1A in particular in the situation of the mountain climber from The Price Is Right, with just a little opposition sufficient to send him over the cliff.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think the state legislature and the Governor might want to try the tactic of opposing the May 19 ballot initiatives, because apparently, anything they support, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ppic.org\/content\/pubs\/survey\/S_309MBS.pdf\">public does the opposite<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When read the full text of the ballot measures, likely voters express these preferences: <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1A: About four in 10 support the measure (39% yes, 46% no, 15% undecided) to change the<br \/>\n<br \/>budget process by increasing the state &#8220;rainy day&#8221; fund. Less than half say the measure would be very (7%)<br \/>\n<br \/>or somewhat (38%) effective in helping California avoid future state budget deficits. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1B: They are divided (44% yes, 41% no, 15% undecided) on the initiative that would require future<br \/>\n<br \/>supplemental payments to local school districts and community colleges to address recent budget cuts. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1C: Half oppose (37% yes, 50% no, 11% undecided) the measure to modernize the lottery and<br \/>\n<br \/>allow for $5 billion in borrowing from future lottery profits to help balance next year&#8217;s state budget. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1D: Nearly half support (48% yes, 36% no, 16% undecided) the proposition to temporarily transfer<br \/>\n<br \/>funds from early childhood education to help balance the state budget. <\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1E: Nearly half favor (47% yes, 37% no, 16% undecided) the measure to transfer money from<br \/>\n<br \/>mental health services to the general fund to help balance the state budget.<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 1F: An overwhelming majority (81% yes, 13% no, 6% undecided) support the initiative that would<br \/>\n<br \/>block pay increases to state elected officials in years of budget deficit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Keep in mind that the first poll, taken about a month ago, showed all six measures passing by a fairly decent margin. &nbsp;And there has been no coordinated opposition. &nbsp;So what changed? &nbsp;I&#8217;d gather the confidence in the legislature and the Governor has completely collapsed:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Eight weeks before the special election-called as part of the 2009-2010 budget agreement between the governor and legislature-those Californians most likely to go to the polls are feeling grim about the state of their state: The vast majority (77%) say it is headed in the wrong direction and see its fiscal situation as a big problem (85%). They give record low ratings to the legislature (11%) and to their own legislators (29%). Their approval rating for Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (33%) has dropped to a new low among likely voters. For the first time, a majority of Republican likely voters (54%) disapprove of the job performance of the Republican governor. <\/p>\n<p>The results are striking when compared to rising approval ratings for Congress and California&#8217;s senators and to &nbsp;<br \/>\n<br \/>a strongly positive view of President Obama-despite a challenging economic climate. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Californians are clear that the budget situation is serious, but most disapprove of the leadership in<br \/>\n<br \/>Sacramento-the people who are providing the solutions,&#8221; says Mark Baldassare, PPIC president, CEO, and<br \/>\n<br \/>survey director. &#8220;These leaders have their work cut out for them if they want to persuade voters that the ballot<br \/>\n<br \/>measures are necessary to address the problem.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If you want to know why the Governor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-arnold25-2009mar25,0,4205725.story?track=rss\">had to explain that he&#8217;s not running for future office<\/a>, that would be because nobody likes him. &nbsp;And the legislature, obviously, is even worse &#8211; the 29% rating for people&#8217;s local legislator is absurdly low and quite dangerous. &nbsp;In a normal world, that would spell lots of primary challenges.<\/p>\n<p>Let me stress that this election is not over &#8211; the opposition still isn&#8217;t well-funded, and the CTA just <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/021024.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">put $2 million into Prop. 1B<\/a>. &nbsp;The Governor has already started funding the other measures. &nbsp;With an unbalanced funding war, these measures could bounce back. &nbsp;But the rule of thumb is that measures in this position right now lose. &nbsp;I see 1A in particular in the situation of the mountain climber from The Price Is Right, with just a little opposition sufficient to send him over the cliff.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[32,117],"tags":[630,422,149,60],"class_list":["post-8386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-32","category-117","tag-630","tag-422","tag-149","tag-60"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2bg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}