{"id":8648,"date":"2009-04-24T18:49:03","date_gmt":"2009-04-24T18:49:03","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-04-24T19:18:48","modified_gmt":"2009-04-24T19:18:48","slug":"dressing-up-a-dog-prop-1a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/04\/24\/dressing-up-a-dog-prop-1a\/","title":{"rendered":"Dressing Up A Dog: Prop 1A"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=http:\/\/i15.photobucket.com\/albums\/a397\/utbriancl\/darth_squirrel.jpg width=250 align=right><i>I&#8217;m quite proud to be working for the <a href=\"http:\/\/votenoon1a.com\/home\">No on Prop 1A<\/a> campaign. <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/8627\/\">More details about that here<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The Yes on Prop 1A campaign has a daunting task in trying to get the voters of California to support the Frankensteinian creation that is Prop 1A. &nbsp;After all, support is hovering <a href=\"http:\/\/cbs5.com\/local\/cbs.5.poll.2.991872.html\">around 29% now<\/a>. So, like I did with Squirrel in her Darth Vader costume, the Prop 1A campaign is trying to do with their dog.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start at the top: Arnold Schwarzenegger, in a meeting with the Bay Area Council, yesterday <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kcbs.com\/Gov-Pushes-for-Bay-Area-Special-Election-Support\/4260516\">said this<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are one of the only state&#8217;s that don&#8217;t have a rainy day fund&#8230; so Prop 1A [will be a historic reform if it passes.]&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Except, wait, where have I heard that? Right, that was in the <a href=\"http:\/\/primary2004.sos.ca.gov\/voterguide\/english_supp.pdf\">ballot argument for Prop 58 (PDF)<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>WILL require general funds to be put in a &#8220;Rainy Day&#8221; fund to build a RESERVE to protect California from future economic downturns. The Budget Stabilization Account will also be used to pay off the California Economic Recovery Bond early;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Wow, how quickly Arnold forgets his own propositions. &nbsp;It&#8217;s easy, I suppose, when they have been spectacularly unsuccessful.<\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s the ads. &nbsp;The Budget Reform Now Committee, that would be the Yes on 1A-F campaign in campaign-speak, released an ad for the teevee. I enjoy that on their web page (and in any YouTube embed), the ad is up there with a one star rating. As for the content of the ad, it is, shall we say, only honest in a way that a political consultant could love. You can peep the whole ad, in all its widescreen glory, over the flip.<\/p>\n<p>The ad is just about as confusing as the measure itself, which is saying quite a bit. For example, the actor in the ad says that &#8220;Prop 1A will give us budget stability.&#8221; Beyond the fact that we&#8217;ve heard that one before, oh, about four years ago with Props 57 &#038; 58, there is the troubling matter of the huge structural budget deficit that Prop 1A leaves in its wake. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>According to the <a href=\"http:\/\/tr.im\/jttm\">California Budget Project&#8217;s report on Prop 1A (PDF)<\/a>, the projected revenue cap will be $16 billion lower than the Governor&#8217;s &#8220;baseline&#8221; spending in 2010-2011, followed by $17 and $21 billion in the next two years. Thus, we&#8217;ll have to either raise taxes or decrease spending. That&#8217;s hardly the stability we need.<\/p>\n<p>Or how about the somewhat audacious claim that Prop 1A will &#8220;help hold the line on higher taxes.&#8221; &nbsp;While I&#8217;m not one to concern myself with that particular issue, the claim is deceptive at best. &nbsp;Ignoring the extended sales tax for the out years, if Prop 1A does anything, it encourages taxes. &nbsp;The most efficient way of resetting the cap is to, drumroll please, raise taxes.<\/p>\n<p>This ad does its best to dress up a dog, but Californians are saying that this <a href=http:\/\/votenoon1a.com>dog just won&#8217;t hunt<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img src=http:\/\/i15.photobucket.com\/albums\/a397\/utbriancl\/darth_squirrel.jpg width=250 align=right><i>I&#8217;m quite proud to be working for the <a href=\"http:\/\/votenoon1a.com\/home\">No on Prop 1A<\/a> campaign. <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/8627\/\">More details about that here<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The Yes on Prop 1A campaign has a daunting task in trying to get the voters of California to support the Frankensteinian creation that is Prop 1A. &nbsp;After all, support is hovering <a href=\"http:\/\/cbs5.com\/local\/cbs.5.poll.2.991872.html\">around 29% now<\/a>. So, like I did with Squirrel in her Darth Vader costume, the Prop 1A campaign is trying to do with their dog.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start at the top: Arnold Schwarzenegger, in a meeting with the Bay Area Council, yesterday <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kcbs.com\/Gov-Pushes-for-Bay-Area-Special-Election-Support\/4260516\">said this<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are one of the only state&#8217;s that don&#8217;t have a rainy day fund&#8230; so Prop 1A [will be a historic reform if it passes.]&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Except, wait, where have I heard that? Right, that was in the <a href=\"http:\/\/primary2004.sos.ca.gov\/voterguide\/english_supp.pdf\">ballot argument for Prop 58 (PDF)<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>WILL require general funds to be put in a &#8220;Rainy Day&#8221; fund to build a RESERVE to protect California from future economic downturns. The Budget Stabilization Account will also be used to pay off the California Economic Recovery Bond early;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Wow, how quickly Arnold forgets his own propositions. &nbsp;It&#8217;s easy, I suppose, when they have been spectacularly unsuccessful.<\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s the ads. &nbsp;The Budget Reform Now Committee, that would be the Yes on 1A-F campaign in campaign-speak, released an ad for the teevee. I enjoy that on their web page (and in any YouTube embed), the ad is up there with a one star rating. As for the content of the ad, it is, shall we say, only honest in a way that a political consultant could love. You can peep the whole ad, in all its widescreen glory, over the flip.<\/p>\n<p>The ad is just about as confusing as the measure itself, which is saying quite a bit. For example, the actor in the ad says that &#8220;Prop 1A will give us budget stability.&#8221; Beyond the fact that we&#8217;ve heard that one before, oh, about four years ago with Props 57 &#038; 58, there is the troubling matter of the huge structural budget deficit that Prop 1A leaves in its wake. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>According to the <a href=\"http:\/\/tr.im\/jttm\">California Budget Project&#8217;s report on Prop 1A (PDF)<\/a>, the projected revenue cap will be $16 billion lower than the Governor&#8217;s &#8220;baseline&#8221; spending in 2010-2011, followed by $17 and $21 billion in the next two years. Thus, we&#8217;ll have to either raise taxes or decrease spending. That&#8217;s hardly the stability we need.<\/p>\n<p>Or how about the somewhat audacious claim that Prop 1A will &#8220;help hold the line on higher taxes.&#8221; &nbsp;While I&#8217;m not one to concern myself with that particular issue, the claim is deceptive at best. &nbsp;Ignoring the extended sales tax for the out years, if Prop 1A does anything, it encourages taxes. &nbsp;The most efficient way of resetting the cap is to, drumroll please, raise taxes.<\/p>\n<p>This ad does its best to dress up a dog, but Californians are saying that this <a href=http:\/\/votenoon1a.com>dog just won&#8217;t hunt<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[32,117],"tags":[6851,5718,149,60],"class_list":["post-8648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-32","category-117","tag-6851","tag-5718","tag-149","tag-60"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2fu","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8648\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}