{"id":8743,"date":"2009-05-03T21:59:18","date_gmt":"2009-05-03T21:59:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-05-03T21:59:18","modified_gmt":"2009-05-03T21:59:18","slug":"who-would-want-these-jobs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/05\/03\/who-would-want-these-jobs\/","title":{"rendered":"Who would want these jobs?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>David Dayen has said repeatedly that he thinks the <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/8320\/\">importance of the next governor is overstated<\/a>. If it is or it isn&#8217;t, it certainly isn&#8217;t really a position that I would like to take a step into. &nbsp;It is a position that is almost certainly a trap for any politician that has any designs on any other office, the chances of failure given the current climate in Sacramento are quite high. While that isn&#8217;t likely to be a huge consideration for Jerry Brown, the other competitors for the job might have ambitions of using the gig as a stepping stone to something else. &nbsp;But I&#8217;ve told anybody who listens that it&#8217;s a sucker&#8217;s play, IMHO. Coming out of the pig sty without mud on your face just ain&#8217;t that easy.<\/p>\n<p>But consider the other big-name gigs in town. &nbsp;Assembly Speakers are a transitory bunch. &nbsp;On occasion you&#8217;ll get somebody in there for the better part of four years, like Fabian Nunez, who can do something to really grab the position and make a name for himself. &nbsp;But typically, you have just two years to make your mark. That&#8217;s a tall order. &nbsp;Karen Bass has talked about big change, but it&#8217;s just not all that clear that she&#8217;ll have the chance to implement any substantial portion of that.<\/p>\n<p>But the Senate President Pro Tem typically gets a longer time to make his mark. &nbsp;Senators have usually served in the Assembly, so they are known quantities when they get to the Upper Chamber. &nbsp;The eyes were already upon Sen. Steinberg to replace Don Perata the moment he was sworn in. &nbsp;People knew he was both a good fundraiser, and a good legislator. And Steinberg clearly wanted the job.<\/p>\n<p>But, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/ourregion\/story\/1829531.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region\">Marcus Breton points out in the Bee today<\/a>, this job turned sour for Steinberg. &nbsp;Steinberg is a good person, stuck in a bad position:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> It&#8217;s about a citizen politician &#8211; one of us &#8211; who is now tagged by an angry public as &#8220;one of them.&#8221; Steinberg preached transparency, but when it came to crafting a tortured state budget, he participated in a secret proceeding that everybody hated.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There was no other way to make a $42 billion dent in the state budget,&#8221; he said Friday. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t like it, but that&#8217;s a fact.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s an honest response to a level of dishonesty. It&#8217;s not burning down the village to save it, but it&#8217;s in the same ballpark. Steinberg is the guy you see around the supermarket and think: How does a nice man get anything done in a snake pit like the Capitol? His ascendancy to the highest levels of state government hinted at a different way of governing.(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/ourregion\/story\/1829531.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region\">SacBee<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve had the chance to talk to Sen. Steinberg a number of times, although I doubt he remembers me. &nbsp;He really is just a nice guy who wants to keep the state running. &nbsp;In many ways, he&#8217;s something of a softie. It&#8217;s really not that tough to read him, and the Republicans saw that. Steinberg really wanted to get a deal done in February, and he did what it took. Whether you agree or disagree with what came out of that week, you can&#8217;t say that he didn&#8217;t work as hard as you see a politician work.<\/p>\n<p>But the underlying facts are still at play for Steinberg, win or lose on May 19, he still has a massive mess in front of him. &nbsp;And there just aren&#8217;t any easy answers for him, or any other legislative leader.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>David Dayen has said repeatedly that he thinks the <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/8320\/\">importance of the next governor is overstated<\/a>. If it is or it isn&#8217;t, it certainly isn&#8217;t really a position that I would like to take a step into. &nbsp;It is a position that is almost certainly a trap for any politician that has any designs on any other office, the chances of failure given the current climate in Sacramento are quite high. While that isn&#8217;t likely to be a huge consideration for Jerry Brown, the other competitors for the job might have ambitions of using the gig as a stepping stone to something else. &nbsp;But I&#8217;ve told anybody who listens that it&#8217;s a sucker&#8217;s play, IMHO. Coming out of the pig sty without mud on your face just ain&#8217;t that easy.<\/p>\n<p>But consider the other big-name gigs in town. &nbsp;Assembly Speakers are a transitory bunch. &nbsp;On occasion you&#8217;ll get somebody in there for the better part of four years, like Fabian Nunez, who can do something to really grab the position and make a name for himself. &nbsp;But typically, you have just two years to make your mark. That&#8217;s a tall order. &nbsp;Karen Bass has talked about big change, but it&#8217;s just not all that clear that she&#8217;ll have the chance to implement any substantial portion of that.<\/p>\n<p>But the Senate President Pro Tem typically gets a longer time to make his mark. &nbsp;Senators have usually served in the Assembly, so they are known quantities when they get to the Upper Chamber. &nbsp;The eyes were already upon Sen. Steinberg to replace Don Perata the moment he was sworn in. &nbsp;People knew he was both a good fundraiser, and a good legislator. And Steinberg clearly wanted the job.<\/p>\n<p>But, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/ourregion\/story\/1829531.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region\">Marcus Breton points out in the Bee today<\/a>, this job turned sour for Steinberg. &nbsp;Steinberg is a good person, stuck in a bad position:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> It&#8217;s about a citizen politician &#8211; one of us &#8211; who is now tagged by an angry public as &#8220;one of them.&#8221; Steinberg preached transparency, but when it came to crafting a tortured state budget, he participated in a secret proceeding that everybody hated.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There was no other way to make a $42 billion dent in the state budget,&#8221; he said Friday. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t like it, but that&#8217;s a fact.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s an honest response to a level of dishonesty. It&#8217;s not burning down the village to save it, but it&#8217;s in the same ballpark. Steinberg is the guy you see around the supermarket and think: How does a nice man get anything done in a snake pit like the Capitol? His ascendancy to the highest levels of state government hinted at a different way of governing.(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/ourregion\/story\/1829531.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region\">SacBee<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve had the chance to talk to Sen. Steinberg a number of times, although I doubt he remembers me. &nbsp;He really is just a nice guy who wants to keep the state running. &nbsp;In many ways, he&#8217;s something of a softie. It&#8217;s really not that tough to read him, and the Republicans saw that. Steinberg really wanted to get a deal done in February, and he did what it took. Whether you agree or disagree with what came out of that week, you can&#8217;t say that he didn&#8217;t work as hard as you see a politician work.<\/p>\n<p>But the underlying facts are still at play for Steinberg, win or lose on May 19, he still has a massive mess in front of him. &nbsp;And there just aren&#8217;t any easy answers for him, or any other legislative leader.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[117],"tags":[3405,4638],"class_list":["post-8743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-3405","tag-4638"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2h1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8743"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8743\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}