{"id":8760,"date":"2009-05-05T03:05:18","date_gmt":"2009-05-05T03:05:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-05-05T03:11:28","modified_gmt":"2009-05-05T03:11:28","slug":"cd10-garamendi-leads-among-likely-voters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/05\/05\/cd10-garamendi-leads-among-likely-voters\/","title":{"rendered":"CA-10: Garamendi Leads Among Likely Voters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>That&#8217;s the verdict according to a J. Moore Methods poll that dropped over the weekend and that found its way into my hands this afternoon. Remember that this is an open primary &#8211; if someone gets more than 50% they win; if not then the top candidates from each party go to a runoff. According to the poll, Lt. Gov. John Garamendi leads among likely voters (36% have no opinion):<\/p>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=1><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD> <\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Garamendi<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Rupf<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>DeSaulnier<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Buchanan<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Support:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>24<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>17<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>13<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>10<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Known:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>80<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>20<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>39<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>45<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Favorable:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>35<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>9<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>16<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>17<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Unfavorable:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>12<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>9<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>13<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>12<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<\/TABLE><\/p>\n<p>(Rupf is Republican Warren Rupf, Sheriff of CoCo County)<\/p>\n<p>The personal ratings are included, which show that Garamendi also has a big name ID and favorability advantage over all his challengers. Voter turnout is projected to be 30%, with 55% Dem, 33% Rep, and 12% DTS.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Garamendi doesn&#8217;t have a 50% lead here, and the election hasn&#8217;t even been scheduled yet. There&#8217;s time for either DeSaulnier or Buchanan to try and catch up, but it&#8217;s going to be a difficult climb. Garamendi&#8217;s high public profile and ability to raise money for this campaign will be significant advantages. DeSaulnier, a solid progressive who would also make an excellent member of Congress, can counter with strong on-the-ground support, but it&#8217;s unclear if that can trump Garamendi&#8217;s built-in advantages.<\/p>\n<p>This leads me to wonder if Buchanan plans to stick around in the race &#8211; I can&#8217;t see her getting very far against this kind of opposition. Or perhaps DeSaulnier might step back and let Garamendi take it. So far as I can tell, however, both fully intend to continue their run.<\/p>\n<p>Neither Anthony Woods nor Adriel Hampton were included in this poll, but I can&#8217;t imagine either one would meaningfully impact the outcome.<\/p>\n<p>So as far as I can tell this is Garamendi&#8217;s to lose. We&#8217;ll see if this poll shifts the landscape at all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>That&#8217;s the verdict according to a J. Moore Methods poll that dropped over the weekend and that found its way into my hands this afternoon. Remember that this is an open primary &#8211; if someone gets more than 50% they win; if not then the top candidates from each party go to a runoff. According to the poll, Lt. Gov. John Garamendi leads among likely voters (36% have no opinion):<\/p>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=1><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD> <\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Garamendi<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Rupf<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>DeSaulnier<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>Buchanan<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Support:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>24<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>17<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>13<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>10<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Known:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>80<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>20<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>39<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>45<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Favorable:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>35<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>9<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>16<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>17<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<TR><br \/>\n  <TD>Unfavorable:<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>12<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>9<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>13<\/TD><br \/>\n  <TD>12<\/TD><br \/>\n<\/TR><br \/>\n<\/TABLE><\/p>\n<p>(Rupf is Republican Warren Rupf, Sheriff of CoCo County)<\/p>\n<p>The personal ratings are included, which show that Garamendi also has a big name ID and favorability advantage over all his challengers. Voter turnout is projected to be 30%, with 55% Dem, 33% Rep, and 12% DTS.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Garamendi doesn&#8217;t have a 50% lead here, and the election hasn&#8217;t even been scheduled yet. There&#8217;s time for either DeSaulnier or Buchanan to try and catch up, but it&#8217;s going to be a difficult climb. Garamendi&#8217;s high public profile and ability to raise money for this campaign will be significant advantages. DeSaulnier, a solid progressive who would also make an excellent member of Congress, can counter with strong on-the-ground support, but it&#8217;s unclear if that can trump Garamendi&#8217;s built-in advantages.<\/p>\n<p>This leads me to wonder if Buchanan plans to stick around in the race &#8211; I can&#8217;t see her getting very far against this kind of opposition. Or perhaps DeSaulnier might step back and let Garamendi take it. So far as I can tell, however, both fully intend to continue their run.<\/p>\n<p>Neither Anthony Woods nor Adriel Hampton were included in this poll, but I can&#8217;t imagine either one would meaningfully impact the outcome.<\/p>\n<p>So as far as I can tell this is Garamendi&#8217;s to lose. We&#8217;ll see if this poll shifts the landscape at all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[6981,7073,7141,6851,2278,275,5936],"class_list":["post-8760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-6981","tag-7073","tag-7141","tag-6851","tag-2278","tag-275","tag-5936"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2hi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8760"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8760\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}