{"id":8820,"date":"2009-05-09T19:58:56","date_gmt":"2009-05-09T19:58:56","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-05-10T00:46:01","modified_gmt":"2009-05-10T00:46:01","slug":"ca36-harman-primary-gets-going","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/05\/09\/ca36-harman-primary-gets-going\/","title":{"rendered":"CA-36: Harman Primary Gets Going"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;m quoted in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0509\/22201.html\">this Politico article<\/a> about potential primary challenges to Jane Harman. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve said clearly that she&#8217;ll either face a primary or drop out, and now multiple challengers, including 2006 opponent Marcy Winograd, have stepped up. &nbsp;One thing that people don&#8217;t totally remember about that 2006 challenge is that Marcy got in the race in February for a June primary. &nbsp;She ended up raising and spending about $380,000, but she did not have time for a national fundraising base or a netroots strategy. &nbsp;She basically just went ahead and ran, and she got 38% of the vote. &nbsp;Starting the primary a year out this time will simply yield better results.<\/p>\n<p>The other part, which Alex Eisenstadt acknowledges, is that Harman was a target long before the recent revelation of wiretapped conservations between her and suspected Israeli agents offering vague quid pro quo deals on getting some AIPAC members out of legal trouble.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s true that Harman holds a firm grip on her comfortably Democratic district, having won 69 percent in the 2008 general election. <\/p>\n<p>Still, her left flank remains exposed in large part because of her hawkish, pro-military reputation. After Sept. 11, 2001, Harman was an early advocate for the creation of a Department of Homeland Security, and she threw her support behind the American-led invasion of Iraq. She went so far as to criticize the FBI and the CIA for moving too slowly to respond to terrorist threats.<\/p>\n<p>Those stances continue to rankle local progressives, and the recent controversy has only revived the frustrations that seemed to crest in 2006 with Winograd&#8217;s challenge. Last week, Winograd organized a protest outside Harman&#8217;s district headquarters, with activists calling on the California Democrat to resign. The environmental organization Greenpeace is coordinating a mailing in the district pressuring Harman, who has a seat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, on energy issues. <\/p>\n<p>David Dayen, a California activist who writes for the liberal blog Calitics, said he expects progressive organizations to ramp up their efforts against Harman in the weeks ahead. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t get the sense that in May, the year before this primary is happening, there is going to be a lot of clamoring over Harman, but I do think you&#8217;re starting to see progressive groups get involved,&#8221; said Dayen.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I reject the theory later in the piece that CA-36 is a moderate district. &nbsp;The PVI is D+12, and the formerly conservative areas have moderated their views. &nbsp;Torrance, the supposed &#8220;Orange County of LA County,&#8221; just elected two Democrats to its City Council. &nbsp;What&#8217;s more, Harman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swingstateproject.com\/diary\/4578\/pvivote-index-for-2008\">votes substantially to the right of the district<\/a> and has for years.<\/p>\n<p>Winograd will be holding a campaign kickoff on Monday at the Venice Pier around 4:00pm, so she&#8217;s obviously serious about making this run again. &nbsp;And <a href=\"http:\/\/downwithtyranny.blogspot.com\/2009\/05\/marcy-winograd-to-take-on-jane-harman.html\">she&#8217;ll be taking questions<\/a> in a liveblog session at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firedoglake.com\">Firedoglake<\/a> today at 11am. &nbsp;John Amato of <a href=\"http:\/\/crooksandliars.com\/\">Crooks and Liars<\/a> fame may also make a run at this seat.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Transcript of the FDL session <a href=\"http:\/\/firedoglake.com\/2009\/05\/09\/marcy-winograd-to-take-on-jane-harman-in-ca-36-again\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;m quoted in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0509\/22201.html\">this Politico article<\/a> about potential primary challenges to Jane Harman. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve said clearly that she&#8217;ll either face a primary or drop out, and now multiple challengers, including 2006 opponent Marcy Winograd, have stepped up. &nbsp;One thing that people don&#8217;t totally remember about that 2006 challenge is that Marcy got in the race in February for a June primary. &nbsp;She ended up raising and spending about $380,000, but she did not have time for a national fundraising base or a netroots strategy. &nbsp;She basically just went ahead and ran, and she got 38% of the vote. &nbsp;Starting the primary a year out this time will simply yield better results.<\/p>\n<p>The other part, which Alex Eisenstadt acknowledges, is that Harman was a target long before the recent revelation of wiretapped conservations between her and suspected Israeli agents offering vague quid pro quo deals on getting some AIPAC members out of legal trouble.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s true that Harman holds a firm grip on her comfortably Democratic district, having won 69 percent in the 2008 general election. <\/p>\n<p>Still, her left flank remains exposed in large part because of her hawkish, pro-military reputation. After Sept. 11, 2001, Harman was an early advocate for the creation of a Department of Homeland Security, and she threw her support behind the American-led invasion of Iraq. She went so far as to criticize the FBI and the CIA for moving too slowly to respond to terrorist threats.<\/p>\n<p>Those stances continue to rankle local progressives, and the recent controversy has only revived the frustrations that seemed to crest in 2006 with Winograd&#8217;s challenge. Last week, Winograd organized a protest outside Harman&#8217;s district headquarters, with activists calling on the California Democrat to resign. The environmental organization Greenpeace is coordinating a mailing in the district pressuring Harman, who has a seat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, on energy issues. <\/p>\n<p>David Dayen, a California activist who writes for the liberal blog Calitics, said he expects progressive organizations to ramp up their efforts against Harman in the weeks ahead. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t get the sense that in May, the year before this primary is happening, there is going to be a lot of clamoring over Harman, but I do think you&#8217;re starting to see progressive groups get involved,&#8221; said Dayen.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I reject the theory later in the piece that CA-36 is a moderate district. &nbsp;The PVI is D+12, and the formerly conservative areas have moderated their views. &nbsp;Torrance, the supposed &#8220;Orange County of LA County,&#8221; just elected two Democrats to its City Council. &nbsp;What&#8217;s more, Harman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swingstateproject.com\/diary\/4578\/pvivote-index-for-2008\">votes substantially to the right of the district<\/a> and has for years.<\/p>\n<p>Winograd will be holding a campaign kickoff on Monday at the Venice Pier around 4:00pm, so she&#8217;s obviously serious about making this run again. &nbsp;And <a href=\"http:\/\/downwithtyranny.blogspot.com\/2009\/05\/marcy-winograd-to-take-on-jane-harman.html\">she&#8217;ll be taking questions<\/a> in a liveblog session at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firedoglake.com\">Firedoglake<\/a> today at 11am. &nbsp;John Amato of <a href=\"http:\/\/crooksandliars.com\/\">Crooks and Liars<\/a> fame may also make a run at this seat.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Transcript of the FDL session <a href=\"http:\/\/firedoglake.com\/2009\/05\/09\/marcy-winograd-to-take-on-jane-harman-in-ca-36-again\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[],"tags":[172,171,7257,170,1080],"class_list":["post-8820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-172","tag-171","tag-7257","tag-170","tag-1080"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2ig","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}