{"id":8931,"date":"2009-05-21T02:27:01","date_gmt":"2009-05-21T02:27:01","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-05-21T02:27:01","modified_gmt":"2009-05-21T02:27:01","slug":"demythologizing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/05\/21\/demythologizing\/","title":{"rendered":"De-Mythologizing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ocprogressive.com\/diary\/638\/noreen-evans-addressses-budget-myths\">OC Progressive<\/a>, Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, Chair of the Budget Committee, spells out slowly for everyone the structural problems and false assertions about the California budget process. &nbsp;If you have non-political junkie friends who want to understand this in a quick and easy way, pass them this link.<\/p>\n<p><object width=\"320\" height=\"265\" align=right><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/ogfNEw2XSbY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><\/object><\/p>\n<p>This is a very good place to start. &nbsp;Evans puts the lie to three big myths about California: <\/p>\n<p>1) The &#8220;runaway spending&#8221; assertion. &nbsp;Um, no. &nbsp;Population and inflation accounts for 68% of the increase. &nbsp;I LOVE how Evans cites the tough on crime sentencing laws as a key element of over-spending, in this case on prisons (20% of the inflation and population-adjusting spending increase). &nbsp;Ballot-box budgeting with no dedicated funding stream (separate from the initiatives voters stopped lawmakers from raiding yesterday, which have funding sources) also contributes to the problem. &nbsp;And there are the prior tax cuts like Prop. 13 and Arnold&#8217;s VLF cut (which would have filled this ENTIRE current deficit). &nbsp;To cover for this we sell bonds and now have to pay out interest to service that debt. &nbsp;The problems beget more problems, and necessitate more cuts because the conservative veto resists taxes.<\/p>\n<p>2) There&#8217;s all these &#8220;waste&#8221; in the budget. &nbsp;Again, no. &nbsp;The Performance Review of 2004 found virtually nothing that would save the state any real money.<\/p>\n<p>3) It&#8217;s just all that messy partisanship from both sides. &nbsp;No. &nbsp;The Democrats have made $40 billion in cuts over the past several years. &nbsp;The Norquistian Yacht Party won&#8217;t budget because they don&#8217;t have to. &nbsp;Evans details the 2\/3 requirement and the conservative veto, and cites Norquist himself!<\/p>\n<p>Seriously, pass this to your friends. &nbsp;Facebook it and Twitter about it. &nbsp;If you internalize these concepts, the solutions are obvious &#8211; we need to restore democracy and give our elected officials a budget process and a Constitution they can actually navigate.<\/p>\n<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, let me debunk one other myth. &nbsp;The one that says all California has to do is sell San Quentin and all that surplus property and save the state. &nbsp;Well, the money raised from selling state property <a href=\"http:\/\/californiascapitol.com\/blog\/?p=374\">would not be able to be used to balance the budget<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Under the terms of Proposition 60A, approved by voters in November 2004, proceeds from the sale of any state surplus property can only be used to pay the interest on $15 billion in budget-balancing bonds sought by the GOP governor and approved by voters in March of the same year.<\/p>\n<p>Once the bonds are paid off &#8211; the Legislative Analyst estimated at the time that cash from the sale of surplus property would speed retirement of the 30-year notes by a &#8220;few months&#8221; &#8211; sale proceeds would be deposited in the state&#8217;s reserve account for emergencies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oops.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ocprogressive.com\/diary\/638\/noreen-evans-addressses-budget-myths\">OC Progressive<\/a>, Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, Chair of the Budget Committee, spells out slowly for everyone the structural problems and false assertions about the California budget process. &nbsp;If you have non-political junkie friends who want to understand this in a quick and easy way, pass them this link.<\/p>\n<p><object width=\"320\" height=\"265\" align=right><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/ogfNEw2XSbY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/ogfNEw2XSbY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" width=\"320\" height=\"265\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p>This is a very good place to start. &nbsp;Evans puts the lie to three big myths about California: <\/p>\n<p>1) The &#8220;runaway spending&#8221; assertion. &nbsp;Um, no. &nbsp;Population and inflation accounts for 68% of the increase. &nbsp;I LOVE how Evans cites the tough on crime sentencing laws as a key element of over-spending, in this case on prisons (20% of the inflation and population-adjusting spending increase). &nbsp;Ballot-box budgeting with no dedicated funding stream (separate from the initiatives voters stopped lawmakers from raiding yesterday, which have funding sources) also contributes to the problem. &nbsp;And there are the prior tax cuts like Prop. 13 and Arnold&#8217;s VLF cut (which would have filled this ENTIRE current deficit). &nbsp;To cover for this we sell bonds and now have to pay out interest to service that debt. &nbsp;The problems beget more problems, and necessitate more cuts because the conservative veto resists taxes.<\/p>\n<p>2) There&#8217;s all these &#8220;waste&#8221; in the budget. &nbsp;Again, no. &nbsp;The Performance Review of 2004 found virtually nothing that would save the state any real money.<\/p>\n<p>3) It&#8217;s just all that messy partisanship from both sides. &nbsp;No. &nbsp;The Democrats have made $40 billion in cuts over the past several years. &nbsp;The Norquistian Yacht Party won&#8217;t budget because they don&#8217;t have to. &nbsp;Evans details the 2\/3 requirement and the conservative veto, and cites Norquist himself!<\/p>\n<p>Seriously, pass this to your friends. &nbsp;Facebook it and Twitter about it. &nbsp;If you internalize these concepts, the solutions are obvious &#8211; we need to restore democracy and give our elected officials a budget process and a Constitution they can actually navigate.<\/p>\n<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, let me debunk one other myth. &nbsp;The one that says all California has to do is sell San Quentin and all that surplus property and save the state. &nbsp;Well, the money raised from selling state property <a href=\"http:\/\/californiascapitol.com\/blog\/?p=374\">would not be able to be used to balance the budget<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Under the terms of Proposition 60A, approved by voters in November 2004, proceeds from the sale of any state surplus property can only be used to pay the interest on $15 billion in budget-balancing bonds sought by the GOP governor and approved by voters in March of the same year.<\/p>\n<p>Once the bonds are paid off &#8211; the Legislative Analyst estimated at the time that cash from the sale of surplus property would speed retirement of the 30-year notes by a &#8220;few months&#8221; &#8211; sale proceeds would be deposited in the state&#8217;s reserve account for emergencies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oops.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[117],"tags":[3262,6093,7309,4739,7310],"class_list":["post-8931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-3262","tag-6093","tag-7309","tag-4739","tag-7310"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2k3","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}