{"id":9185,"date":"2009-06-23T17:14:22","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T17:14:22","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-06-23T17:15:41","modified_gmt":"2009-06-23T17:15:41","slug":"its-that-arambula-doesnt-matter-thats-the-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/06\/23\/its-that-arambula-doesnt-matter-thats-the-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s That Arambula DOESN&#8217;T Matter That&#8217;s The Problem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With Juan Arambula <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/9183\/asm-juan-arambula-leaves-the-democratic-party\">apparently leaving the Democratic Party<\/a>, a day before both chambers were scheduled to vote on the Democratic alternative budget, it&#8217;s striking how little difference this will make. &nbsp;Because the legislature will not vote to enact a budget but to revise it, on everything but tax increases they need only a majority vote. &nbsp;And the way that the Democrats structured their version, less than 10% of the bill include solutions requiring a 2\/3 vote. &nbsp; And Assembly Democrats still hold a 49-29-1 advantage even if Arambula becomes an independent. &nbsp;What&#8217;s more, the leadership structured a fallback option should those oil and tobacco taxes go down, along with a couple repeals of corporate tax breaks passed in February. &nbsp;Presumably they would simply shrink the budget reserve and pass the same budget, and that could also be done on a majority-vote basis &#8211; actually they could pass the oil and cigarette taxes through a majority-vote fee swap, if they really wanted to, although I reluctantly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/california\/ci_12659540\">agree with this article<\/a> that Democrats are probably posturing, knowing they don&#8217;t have the votes and hoping to at least fork some Republicans on &#8220;voting with Big Tobacco and Big Oil. &nbsp;It&#8217;s simply good politics to do so, but that&#8217;s a small consolation to those who may see their services cut as a result.<\/p>\n<p>There is a cost to passing these revisions by majority vote, however, because anything done in this fashion will take effect 90 days out, while a 2\/3 vote for any revision would take effect immediately. &nbsp;Obviously, with a 90-day lag the savings will not be as robust on the cuts, requiring yet another go-round of this at the end of the year, which was probably inevitable anyway given the lack of revenue filling state coffers. &nbsp;And of course, that will be on the heads of those Republicans who don&#8217;t vote for these solutions, those &#8220;fiscally responsible&#8221; types who will cost the state money by failing to fast-track these revisions. &nbsp;Let&#8217;s hope, beyond hope, that actually reaches the headlines.<\/p>\n<p>The point to all this is that the Democrats&#8217; budget <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/06\/22\/us\/22calif.html?_r=1&#038;hpw\">will provide a significant amount of pain<\/a>, which is why they don&#8217;t have to put up too much of a fight to get it passed. &nbsp;The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbp.org\/pdfs\/2009\/090619_Budget_Comparison.pdf\">side-by-side comparison<\/a> of the two budgets shows pretty clearly that Democrats accepted a substantial amount of the cuts, and also some of the gimmicks that the Governor had in his plan. &nbsp;They added <a href=\"http:\/\/californiascapitol.com\/blog\/?p=409\">a couple tax increases<\/a> but not the broad restructuring of government necessary to protect the most vulnerable. &nbsp;They repealed a couple corporate tax breaks for CEOs but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/opinion\/story\/1965076.html\">not as many as they could have<\/a>. &nbsp;If you&#8217;re going to engage in what George Skelton calls <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/columnists\/la-me-cap22-2009jun22,0,6698481.column\">Kabuki theater<\/a>, since you&#8217;re delivered a fallback plan, don&#8217;t <em>compromise the Kabuki<\/em> and instead create the real vision for the state that you desire, something that the grassroots, just getting their feet wet in this fight, can rally behind. &nbsp;Or maybe, the Democratic caucus DID, a somewhat terrifying thought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With Juan Arambula <a href=\"https:\/\/calitics.com\/diary\/9183\/asm-juan-arambula-leaves-the-democratic-party\">apparently leaving the Democratic Party<\/a>, a day before both chambers were scheduled to vote on the Democratic alternative budget, it&#8217;s striking how little difference this will make. &nbsp;Because the legislature will not vote to enact a budget but to revise it, on everything but tax increases they need only a majority vote. &nbsp;And the way that the Democrats structured their version, less than 10% of the bill include solutions requiring a 2\/3 vote. &nbsp; And Assembly Democrats still hold a 49-29-1 advantage even if Arambula becomes an independent. &nbsp;What&#8217;s more, the leadership structured a fallback option should those oil and tobacco taxes go down, along with a couple repeals of corporate tax breaks passed in February. &nbsp;Presumably they would simply shrink the budget reserve and pass the same budget, and that could also be done on a majority-vote basis &#8211; actually they could pass the oil and cigarette taxes through a majority-vote fee swap, if they really wanted to, although I reluctantly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/california\/ci_12659540\">agree with this article<\/a> that Democrats are probably posturing, knowing they don&#8217;t have the votes and hoping to at least fork some Republicans on &#8220;voting with Big Tobacco and Big Oil. &nbsp;It&#8217;s simply good politics to do so, but that&#8217;s a small consolation to those who may see their services cut as a result.<\/p>\n<p>There is a cost to passing these revisions by majority vote, however, because anything done in this fashion will take effect 90 days out, while a 2\/3 vote for any revision would take effect immediately. &nbsp;Obviously, with a 90-day lag the savings will not be as robust on the cuts, requiring yet another go-round of this at the end of the year, which was probably inevitable anyway given the lack of revenue filling state coffers. &nbsp;And of course, that will be on the heads of those Republicans who don&#8217;t vote for these solutions, those &#8220;fiscally responsible&#8221; types who will cost the state money by failing to fast-track these revisions. &nbsp;Let&#8217;s hope, beyond hope, that actually reaches the headlines.<\/p>\n<p>The point to all this is that the Democrats&#8217; budget <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/06\/22\/us\/22calif.html?_r=1&#038;hpw\">will provide a significant amount of pain<\/a>, which is why they don&#8217;t have to put up too much of a fight to get it passed. &nbsp;The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbp.org\/pdfs\/2009\/090619_Budget_Comparison.pdf\">side-by-side comparison<\/a> of the two budgets shows pretty clearly that Democrats accepted a substantial amount of the cuts, and also some of the gimmicks that the Governor had in his plan. &nbsp;They added <a href=\"http:\/\/californiascapitol.com\/blog\/?p=409\">a couple tax increases<\/a> but not the broad restructuring of government necessary to protect the most vulnerable. &nbsp;They repealed a couple corporate tax breaks for CEOs but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/opinion\/story\/1965076.html\">not as many as they could have<\/a>. &nbsp;If you&#8217;re going to engage in what George Skelton calls <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/columnists\/la-me-cap22-2009jun22,0,6698481.column\">Kabuki theater<\/a>, since you&#8217;re delivered a fallback plan, don&#8217;t <em>compromise the Kabuki<\/em> and instead create the real vision for the state that you desire, something that the grassroots, just getting their feet wet in this fight, can rally behind. &nbsp;Or maybe, the Democratic caucus DID, a somewhat terrifying thought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[117],"tags":[6066,221,342,422,4739,60],"class_list":["post-9185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-6066","tag-221","tag-342","tag-422","tag-4739","tag-60"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2o9","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}