{"id":9240,"date":"2009-06-29T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-29T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-06-29T23:12:14","modified_gmt":"2009-06-29T23:12:14","slug":"senate-expected-to-follow-assembly-with-majority-vote-budget-today","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/06\/29\/senate-expected-to-follow-assembly-with-majority-vote-budget-today\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate Expected To Follow Assembly With Majority Vote Budget Today"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In case you weren&#8217;t following along in the middle of the night, Assembly Democrats <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-budget29-2009jun29,0,4205741.story?track=rss\">passed a majority vote budget<\/a> that solves the entire $24 billion dollar deficit, as the Governor requested. &nbsp;Through a maneuver found legal and Constitutional by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst, the Assembly added a $1.50 per pack cigarette tax, a 9.9% oil severance tax on producers, and a $15 surcharge in the vehicle license fee to fund state parks, in addition to the homeowner insurance fee to fund emergency response systems, which was included in the Governor&#8217;s initial budget revision. &nbsp;The new taxes amount to $2 billion of the $24 billion solution. &nbsp;The majority of actions in this alternative budget remain cuts. &nbsp;And according to <a href=\"http:\/\/californiabudget.blogspot.com\/2009\/06\/48-hours-from-edge-assembly-moves.html\">Noreen Evans<\/a>, the Senate will take up this majority-vote budget later today.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The majority approach was not our first choice. We spent weeks in Conference Committee pursuing a bipartisan budget solution. But we have hit a wall. And, we cannot afford to wait any longer. We are 48 hours away from the state plunging into financial ruin. The Legislature has a duty to act with or without Republicans for the good of California [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>As the old saying goes: lead, follow, or get out of the way. By voting against cuts and revenues tonight, the basis of any budget, Republicans ran from their responsibility to govern.<\/p>\n<p>We gave legislative Republicans a chance to lead with us through a month of public hearings in the Conference Committee. That was the opportunity to present alternative budget proposals. Republicans squandered this opportunity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If the Senate passes this and puts it on the Governor&#8217;s desk within 24 hours of the deadline to stop the state from issuing IOUs, he will have a simple choice to make. &nbsp;Will he shut down the government because he failed to get everything he wanted from the legislature? &nbsp;I suspect he will, actually. &nbsp;And indeed, <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2389821980\">he has issued a statement to this effect<\/a>, saying that he wants a &#8220;budget that solves our entire deficit without raising taxes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the short-term state of affairs. &nbsp;Going forward, the process itself is fundamentally broken, a fact that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-cap29-2009jun29,0,4866723.column?page=2&#038;track=rss\">the state&#8217;s political media class has decided to notice<\/a> in a boomlet of &#8220;How to fix California&#8221; articles over the past week. &nbsp;I look forward to those debates. &nbsp;If the Governor vetoes this budget, he will be shutting down the government and forestalling the effort to finally reform the process.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;more from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/023492.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">Governor<\/a>, as he vows to veto this bill, calling it &#8220;illegal,&#8221; which is pretty far. &nbsp;It is worth noting that, since most of this budget revision would not take effect for 90 days because none of them received a 2\/3 vote, it is true that such a solution would not completely impact the immediate cash-flow problem. &nbsp;Although, you could argue that putting such a solution in place would allow the state to borrow from investors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In case you weren&#8217;t following along in the middle of the night, Assembly Democrats <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-budget29-2009jun29,0,4205741.story?track=rss\">passed a majority vote budget<\/a> that solves the entire $24 billion dollar deficit, as the Governor requested. &nbsp;Through a maneuver found legal and Constitutional by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst, the Assembly added a $1.50 per pack cigarette tax, a 9.9% oil severance tax on producers, and a $15 surcharge in the vehicle license fee to fund state parks, in addition to the homeowner insurance fee to fund emergency response systems, which was included in the Governor&#8217;s initial budget revision. &nbsp;The new taxes amount to $2 billion of the $24 billion solution. &nbsp;The majority of actions in this alternative budget remain cuts. &nbsp;And according to <a href=\"http:\/\/californiabudget.blogspot.com\/2009\/06\/48-hours-from-edge-assembly-moves.html\">Noreen Evans<\/a>, the Senate will take up this majority-vote budget later today.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The majority approach was not our first choice. We spent weeks in Conference Committee pursuing a bipartisan budget solution. But we have hit a wall. And, we cannot afford to wait any longer. We are 48 hours away from the state plunging into financial ruin. The Legislature has a duty to act with or without Republicans for the good of California [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>As the old saying goes: lead, follow, or get out of the way. By voting against cuts and revenues tonight, the basis of any budget, Republicans ran from their responsibility to govern.<\/p>\n<p>We gave legislative Republicans a chance to lead with us through a month of public hearings in the Conference Committee. That was the opportunity to present alternative budget proposals. Republicans squandered this opportunity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If the Senate passes this and puts it on the Governor&#8217;s desk within 24 hours of the deadline to stop the state from issuing IOUs, he will have a simple choice to make. &nbsp;Will he shut down the government because he failed to get everything he wanted from the legislature? &nbsp;I suspect he will, actually. &nbsp;And indeed, <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2389821980\">he has issued a statement to this effect<\/a>, saying that he wants a &#8220;budget that solves our entire deficit without raising taxes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the short-term state of affairs. &nbsp;Going forward, the process itself is fundamentally broken, a fact that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-cap29-2009jun29,0,4866723.column?page=2&#038;track=rss\">the state&#8217;s political media class has decided to notice<\/a> in a boomlet of &#8220;How to fix California&#8221; articles over the past week. &nbsp;I look forward to those debates. &nbsp;If the Governor vetoes this budget, he will be shutting down the government and forestalling the effort to finally reform the process.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;more from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/023492.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">Governor<\/a>, as he vows to veto this bill, calling it &#8220;illegal,&#8221; which is pretty far. &nbsp;It is worth noting that, since most of this budget revision would not take effect for 90 days because none of them received a 2\/3 vote, it is true that such a solution would not completely impact the immediate cash-flow problem. &nbsp;Although, you could argue that putting such a solution in place would allow the state to borrow from investors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[32,117],"tags":[221,422,6843,4739,60],"class_list":["post-9240","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-32","category-117","tag-221","tag-422","tag-6843","tag-4739","tag-60"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2p2","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9240"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9240\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}