{"id":9478,"date":"2009-07-24T03:53:01","date_gmt":"2009-07-24T03:53:01","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-07-24T04:42:04","modified_gmt":"2009-07-24T04:42:04","slug":"big-hurdle-the-redevelopment-scheme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/2009\/07\/24\/big-hurdle-the-redevelopment-scheme\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Hurdle: The Redevelopment Scheme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Budget votes, originally scheduled in the Legislature for 2:00, have now been pushed back multiple times. &nbsp;The lastest word we have is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/024141.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">7:00 or 8:00<\/a>, according to Karen Bass.<\/p>\n<p>One major hurdle seems to be the securitization of redevelopment agency funds, which would net about $7.4 billion dollars over the life of the borrowing. &nbsp;Yesterday, Mark DeSaulnier described that provision to me as both &#8220;insane&#8221; and &#8220;illegal.&#8221; &nbsp;Insane I expect, but illegal would mean that it could not be enacted tonight. &nbsp;And we are now hearing from <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/ccleague\/statuses\/2809635052\">several<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2809535395\">sources<\/a> that the redevelopment legality is throwing a wrench into the budget package.<\/p>\n<p>Remember, this is something that City of Industry lobbyists have been seeking for years, primarily so they can <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-industry-stadium23-2009jul23,0,5992652.story\">fund an outdoor stadium<\/a> and attract an NFL franchise. &nbsp;The way that it&#8217;s been structured, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2809293913\">reports<\/a>, is that this borrowing maneuver, which would tie up about 10% of total property tax revenue for up to 30 years, would replace the seizure of local government funds through Prop. 1A and HUTA (the gas tax). &nbsp;If the redevelopment securitization gets shot down, the borrowing would come from the above.<\/p>\n<p>This was described to me last night by DeSaulnier as a shadow play, so Dennis Hollingsworth and his buddies can say they tried not to take from local governments. &nbsp;But it&#8217;s completely unclear whether anyone would vote to take those funds through Prop. 1A and HUTA, which would blow enough of a hole to scuttle the deal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;The State Senate is in session right now. &nbsp;You can watch at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calchannel.com\/channel\/live\/1\">CalChannel<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;re voting to suspend the rules to allow votes to happen tonight. &nbsp;It went through unanimously except for Wyland (R).<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;The first bill of the series is the prison bill, which just allocates the reduction in funding. Denham has a poison pill amendment to actually set out the policy, which the Yacht Party kicked and screamed that <em>the Democrats<\/em> were trying to do. &nbsp;The amendments got tabled. &nbsp;What nonsense. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll start a new thread.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Budget votes, originally scheduled in the Legislature for 2:00, have now been pushed back multiple times. &nbsp;The lastest word we have is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/static\/weblogs\/capitolalertlatest\/024141.html?mi_rss=Capitol%20Alert\">7:00 or 8:00<\/a>, according to Karen Bass.<\/p>\n<p>One major hurdle seems to be the securitization of redevelopment agency funds, which would net about $7.4 billion dollars over the life of the borrowing. &nbsp;Yesterday, Mark DeSaulnier described that provision to me as both &#8220;insane&#8221; and &#8220;illegal.&#8221; &nbsp;Insane I expect, but illegal would mean that it could not be enacted tonight. &nbsp;And we are now hearing from <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/ccleague\/statuses\/2809635052\">several<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2809535395\">sources<\/a> that the redevelopment legality is throwing a wrench into the budget package.<\/p>\n<p>Remember, this is something that City of Industry lobbyists have been seeking for years, primarily so they can <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-industry-stadium23-2009jul23,0,5992652.story\">fund an outdoor stadium<\/a> and attract an NFL franchise. &nbsp;The way that it&#8217;s been structured, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/KQED_CapNotes\/status\/2809293913\">reports<\/a>, is that this borrowing maneuver, which would tie up about 10% of total property tax revenue for up to 30 years, would replace the seizure of local government funds through Prop. 1A and HUTA (the gas tax). &nbsp;If the redevelopment securitization gets shot down, the borrowing would come from the above.<\/p>\n<p>This was described to me last night by DeSaulnier as a shadow play, so Dennis Hollingsworth and his buddies can say they tried not to take from local governments. &nbsp;But it&#8217;s completely unclear whether anyone would vote to take those funds through Prop. 1A and HUTA, which would blow enough of a hole to scuttle the deal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;The State Senate is in session right now. &nbsp;You can watch at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calchannel.com\/channel\/live\/1\">CalChannel<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;re voting to suspend the rules to allow votes to happen tonight. &nbsp;It went through unanimously except for Wyland (R).<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;The first bill of the series is the prison bill, which just allocates the reduction in funding. Denham has a poison pill amendment to actually set out the policy, which the Yacht Party kicked and screamed that <em>the Democrats<\/em> were trying to do. &nbsp;The amendments got tabled. &nbsp;What nonsense. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll start a new thread.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[117],"tags":[422,7629],"class_list":["post-9478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-117","tag-422","tag-7629"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Pvhz-2sS","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}