The Conundrum of Prop 77

Prop 77 seems to be gaining some serious steam in the last few weeks.  Common Cause endorsed it, as have the SF Chronicle and several other major newspapers.

More importantly to the progressive community, it looks like Kos now supports it as well.

I’m filling out my absentee ballot, and I’ve been trying to find a reason to vote no on 77, Arnold’s effort to create a non-partisan redistricting process in California. And I can’t think of any. I’m not sure why busting the current incumbent-protection racket would be a bad thing, why creating competitive districts and forcing incumbents to be more responsive to their constituents than the current 70-80 percent partisan districts require.

What are we good California Progressives to do?  I must say that I support Ohio’s REform Ohio Now(RON), which isn’t really much different than Prop 77.  In theory, if the districts are more fair, and more competitive, Dems will pick up seats.  IMHO anyway.  I support election reform in general and have to say that if I am to be consistent with my support of RON, I must support Prop. 77.

Wow, but I really hate to support any of Ahnold’s props.  It’s a tough call, and one that I, and all of the state’s progressives must wrestle with.

I know there are other sides of this issue.  Specifically, if we start seeding ground to the GOP on principle, it may be hard to win in actuality.  Any ideas?

An univited guest to our state?

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

Uh-oh…looks like The Pres and The GOvernator are having a little squabble.  From the Hotline Compilation of news stories…

An Uninvited Guest
 Robert Novak writes that Pres. Bush is scheduled to appear in Los Angeles 10/20, ignoring Schwarzenegger’s request that he stay out of the state leading up to the special election (Chicago Sun-Times,10/16).
 As an incumbent and “major Hollywood celebrity,” Schwarzenegger has a built-in fundraising edge that is helping “fatten his campaign accounts — whether he exploits them explicitly or not.” He and his aides say he “cannot be influenced” by contributions. But good-gov’t types say “the perception is there,” and Dems say he’s being hypocritical because he said he wouldn’t accept money from people with business before the state (Delsohn, Sacramento Bee, 10/16).