CA-50 Brian Bilbray and the “L” Word

You can call Brian Bilbray lots of things, but there is one thing he just won’t allow.  The Republican candidate for Randy “Duke” Cunningham’s seat in the CA-50 doesn’t want anyone to associate him with the job he has been doing for the last six years.  Bilbray has been a LOBBYIST.

Bilbray doesn’t like being called a moderate, because he is fighting with Bill Morrow and Howard Kaloogian for the wingnut vote.  He doesn’t like being called a carpetbagger, despite the fact that his real residence in Virginia and he have never lived in the North County.  He is using his mother’s La Costa address as his current residence.

But, what Bilbray really won’t allow is for anyone to suggest that the job he has held since he was run out of congress in 2000 is as a registered lobbyist.

The San Diego Union Tribune reports on Bilbray’s lobbying income (six figures annually), his clients and even allegations that he used his floor privileges as a former house member to lobby sitting members of congress.  Yet, the most important point of the UT story is that Bilbray was able to convince the registrar of voters that he isn’t a lobbyist, but is instead an “immigration reform advocate.”  It is a clever dodge, but it is no more honest than Jack Abramoff, who the article links to Bilbray, calling himself a “native American gaming consultant.”

Rival Republican candidate Eric Roach is suing to have the April 11 special election ballot reflect Brian Bilbray’s actual occupation.

A Conversation with Phil Angelides

Phil Angelides’ campaign invited a few bloggers to a conference call this afternoon.  As a starting point, I must point out that I am impressed that Angelides is reaching out to the blogging community.  The conference call was an excellent opportunity to ask him a few questions and get a sense of the man behind the candidate.  Considering that he is running against a former Ebay executive, he has done an excellent job of using technology to his benefit.  For that alone I am impressed.

Details of the call on the flip…

So, Phil began by discussing the goals of his campaign and why he wants to be governor.  Going through his backstory (which can be found at his website) and strolling through his beginnings in community organizing.  He of course highlighted his time as chairman of the California Democratic Party and his support of Sens. Boxer and Feinstein.  They are now supporting him.  I suppose it helps to have friends and a history.

He pounced on Arnold, attacking him for reducing support for higher education and the Healthy Families insurance program.  The thing he really pushed is how different he is from Arnold.  This is his strongest selling point for the primary: Phil Angelides never signed on with Arnold’s bizarre agenda.  And for that one has to give him credit.

Another point of interest: Frank Russo, an attorney in the East Bay who is working on establishing a blog, asked about the nature of the campaign.  Phil promised to run a principled campaign, “a campaign that will make California proud.”

Finally, the state’s infrastructure came up.  Jonathon Singer of mydd.com asked a general question about the bonding package.  He gave a standard political answer about Arnold’s focus not being in the right place.  Too much highways, not enough mass transit, etc.  I followed up with a question about the delta flood plain issue.  While he did not address my point blank question, of whether he supported a moratorium on construction in selected flood plains, he did address the long term flood control issue.  Phil highlighted the fact that we need more federal dollars for the levees as well as the possibility of stakeholders paying for some of these programs.

All in all,  I think it was a good process of feeling out Angelides a little bit.