Ride the 580 to CD11 to fire Dick Pombo

As you can see by my handle, I’m in Los Angeles, not Northern California, but the Bay Area was once my stomping grounds, and anyway, the race I’m talking about here is for U.S. Congress and what happens to Dick Pombo this November is every American’s business.  So wherever you are in California, listen up: Sacramento is not our only priority this year.

While the state’s Democratic activist base in the Bay Area focuses on the Janet Reilly – Fiona Ma contest and Jerry Brown’s bid for Attorney General — important races, no question about it — right on down the 580 highway, not an hour outside of San Francisco, lies Congressional District 11.  CD 11 is home to one of the most corrupt, anti-environmental right-wing Republicans in Congress, who has amassed a war chest of almost a million and a half bucks, well over a million of which is cash on hand.  That’s in comparison to the DCCC-endorsed Democratic candidate, who has a little more than a tenth of that amount, and the candidate claiming the “grassroots” mantle, who would have a very difficult time competing for a State Assembly seat in his district with the money he currently has at his disposal.

That’s not to say that Pombo isn’t sweating it, however.  Here’s how the San Francisco Chronicle described the Congressman’s changing district in an article from 2005:

Pombo, who is pictured on his House Web site wearing a cowboy hat, had no worries about the Bay Area’s liberal voters when he won a close and nasty battle in 1992. He was an old-school rancher whose slogan — “Central Valley Values” — struck a chord in Tracy and Stockton.

But two things have happened since then. A huge influx of priced-out Bay Area home buyers have flooded his district — Tracy’s population was 33,000 in 1990 and 74,000 in 2004 — and in 2001, the boundary lines were re-drawn. Pombo’s District 11 now stretches from Lodi to Morgan Hill and includes chunks of Santa Clara, Alameda and Contra Costa counties in addition to San Joaquin County. It is a much different constituency.

Voters in parts of the district may not share the same values as a congressman who complains about endangered species protection, wants to drill for oil off the coast of California, favors a ban on abortion and is against gun control.

Some of them are pushing hard for a Democrat to beat him in next year’s election.

What the article doesn’t mention is that even outside of his district, when election seasons roll around, Bay Area Democratic activists have become a more mobile lot than they once were, a fact to which anyone who spent Election Day 2004 in Reno or Las Vegas can attest.  And years and years of being shut out of power have taught a lot of Democrats the wisdom of looking beyond one’s immediate vicinity and focusing donations and activism on races of strategic importance — even ones that require a road trip to reach.

So once again, the stereotype maintains: the Republican candidate has the money, the Democratic candidate has the people.  Or maybe not — so far, there’s been a lot of promising talk, but not a lot of action yet from grassroots activists in CD-11.  This is a call to action to start walking the talk.

This brand spanking new website from the Action Caucus of the California Young Democrats is a great place to start:

http://www.lefton580.org/

As a matter of fact, you can start tomorrow, with Defenders of Wildlife:

http://www.lefton580.org/rideboard/event.php?id=5

Let’s show Pombo that “Central Valley Values” and Bay Area Values aren’t that different after all.  They’re simply American Values, and they have nothing to do with the Jack Abramoff-loving, National Park-hating, twisted right-wing corruption of Dick Pombo.

California Democratic Convention: Phil Rocks the House

Live blogging form the Convention in Sacramento (Angelides volunteer)

Phil Angelides arrived at the state convention today to a roaring crowd with chants of “Go Phil Go!”  If the convention vibe is any indication, Phil’s going to take the endorsement this weekend (we really need 60% – so help us out delegates!), and then the primary in June. 

Phil’s the only Democrat who’s had the guts to stick up to the failed policies of the Schwarzenegger administration.  He’s fought for the little guy and has been a leader nationally in fighting corporate corruption.  Recently he led an initiative to disinvest CalSTRS from Sudan. 

He’s fought for education and knows that the only way to solve our budget deficit and fully fund education in California is to raise taxes on the wealthiest 1%, and cut tax loopholes for wealthy corporations (oil companies for example who are currently enjoying record windfall profits).  His proposed tax increase is actually less than what governors Wilson and Reagan did.

Keep refreshing because I’ll be updating from the convention.  Let’s go Phil!

Flood Fears Fade: What about the Levees?

The flood season is over, or so it seems:

Typically, flood season runs from the first of November through about mid- April, Hinojosa said; this year, heavy storms continued right up to Easter, and the threat along the San Joaquin River has lingered.

Now, however, the Sacramento River system is running well below the “monitor” and “flood” stages, with plenty of room to accommodate water from snow melting in the Sierra.
***
Sacramentals need not fear a flood from all the melting snow, Hinojosa said. Reservoirs and river channels in the Sacramento River system, which includes the American and Feather rivers, have plenty of space for conveying the oncoming water flows.(SacBee 4/28/06)

Now, the only remaining question is whether the state and federal governement will return to its ostrich-like stance on the levees (“Uhh…sure they’ll hold…let’s talk about my plan to ban E-D drugs from the prisons”).  They still need work so that we don’t have the “next New Orleans” on our hands.

Listening Governator Schwarzenegger?

The battle over CA-11: Filson and McNerney

( – promoted by SFBrianCL)

The battle is getting hot and heavy in the quest to take Pombo out of office in CA-11.  Jerry McNerney, who lost to Pombo in 2004, has been getting most of the “grassroots” endorsements, such as DFA, East Bay Young Democrats, and also recently picked up the SEIU’s endorsement.

Steve Filson, on the other hand, is a political novice, but brings to bear a lot of Democratic heavy hitters (remind you of any other race…see below).  He’s supported  by a bevy of Congressman, most notably Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, state officials, including Don Perata,  and many of the Democratic politicos around the district (including the longtime State Senator from Stockton, Patrick Johnston).  This has lead to a substantial money advantage, as Filson has been able to tap traditional Washington funding sources. 

There are better people to tell you about Pombo, such as Say No to Pombo, where Matt is doing an excellent job, but you’ll find that almost universally that they will work for either candidate if it means a Pombo defeat.  But a victory in this race is going to require a lot of manpower.  Pombo will have a huge financial advantage against either candidate, and having people at the grassroots will help.  But, for some reason, Filson, after losing these endorsements, he has been on something of a tear against the grassroots. From Progressive 11 Blog:

Steve Filson criticized the grassroots group’s that have endorsed Jerry McNerney for Congress as being “extreme.” He in particular focused his attack on Bay Area progressive’s at the forum in Richard Pombo’s home town of Tracy, Ca. (Prog-11) 4/25/06

I’m not sure what Filson was thinking, but this can in no way be a helpful tactic to him.  He angers the left, who increase turnout in the primary to defeat him, or if he wins, he loses the foot soldiers.  I’m not sure what he’s trying to pull here, but it’s completely unproductive.

Wilkes and Wade Pimped for the Duke

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mitchell Wade and Brent Wilkes were providing prostitutes and secure location in which he could indulge their services to convicted Republican felon Randy “Duke” Cunningham as a part of their full service bribery scheme.

Federal investigators are also working to determine which additional members of congress received similar services from Wade and Wilkes. I suspect that they started with the members who got the most in contributions from Wade and Wilkes. That would include a stable of prominent California Republicans.

Just when you thought that Cunningham couldn’t sink any lower, he shows you that he has the capacity to dive deeper.

Can Angelides get the endorsement?

(Bumped with new material – promoted by SFBrianCL)

UPDATE: Bill Bradley said today that he believes Angelides is close to getting the endoresement:

The two Democratic candidates for governor, Controller Steve Westly and Treasurer Phil Angelides, go into the state Democratic convention that begins today in Sacramento with Westly leading in public and private polls and at odds with Angelides over an independent expenditure advertising drive funded by Angelides’ campaign finance co-chair and former business partner. While calls around the party indicate that Angelides is on the verge of winning the long expected pre-primary endorsement of the state party he once ran, a private Democratic poll of primary voters shows a 10-point lead for Westly.(NWN 4/28/06)

Now, I’m sure Mr. Bradley has good sources for this, so I’m sure it’s pretty good info.  Overall, the post is mostly about Westly and Angelides whacking each other over the head with campaign finance allegations.  (Just one more reason for publicly financed campaigns.)  However, Mr. Bradley prefaces the tale of the cross-allegations with this:

Neither Democratic candidate is ready for the prime time of running against an incumbent governor who was once the biggest movie star in the world.

Not only does he write this, but he bolds it.  (Mr. Bradley is a fan of highlighting what he thinks is most important for the reader.  Actually, it’s quite a time-saver, but it seems like it might be a bit insulting to some readers.)  So, what is meant by that?  Well, he goes on to explain:

Republicans around the former action superstar scoff at Westly’s one term as state controller, saying he has “left no footprints in the snow.”…As for Angelides, while they say they don’t care which Democrat Schwarzenegger ends up facing, his tax-and-spend liberalism and developer background clearly offers them what one calls “a target rich environment.”

So, they don’t think Westly can beat Schwarzenegger because Westly doesn’t have enough gravitas?  Are you kidding me?  Arnold, the action movie star…has more gravitas?  If they want to play a gravitas game, I’m thinking…”It’s not a tumor.”…Arnold in drag going to Mars…He just screams gravitas.

And Angelides has given California a plan to fund education.  Yes, it involves tax increases.  But if there is one thing that Californians are willing to absorb tax increases for it is education.

Personally, I think both matchups give us some great talking points for June-November.

See the flip for the old post…

2 months ago, this was a simple question.  Angelides had the 60 percent of delegates wrapped up.  Well, times have changed.  With Westly’s lead and his continuing money edge, Westly might have the votes to block Angelides from getting the nod.

An estimated 1,800 Democratic delegates will decide Saturday at the Sacramento Convention Center whether the state party should officially endorse one of the candidates before the election. A winner would have to secure 60 percent of delegate votes.(SacBee 4/27/06)

Angelides has a large lead over Westly in the “party insiders” category.  But I think there are enough delegates getting a little queasy about Angelides and sensing the advantage in having a candidate that can compete financially with Gov. Schwarzenegger.  In my mind, the race is still quite tight, and it won’t be easy for Angelides to get people to jump off the fence at thihs point.  But, ultimately, the question is, does the party’s endorsement even matter?

The state Democratic party has not endorsed a gubernatorial candidate in a contested primary since state Attorney General John Van de Kamp beat Dianne Feinstein in 1990. Van de Kamp reached 60 percent only after a recount found he cleared the hurdle by six votes out of 1,544 cast.

But an official party endorsement is no guarantee: Feinstein ultimately won the primary.