(Truly an amazing reversal by Governor Hoover on this. – promoted by David Dayen)
What can $100 million buy you? Apparently California’s coastline if Big Oil has its way.
In late January, as chair of the California State Lands Commission, I joined State Controller John Chiang in a two-to-one vote to deny the first offshore oil lease off the coast of California in more than four decades. To permit more oil production off the coast of California, a state seen the world over as a leader in environmental stewardship, would have sent a terrible signal that California isn’t yet prepared to embrace a green economy. The risk of a major oil spill killing marine life, soiling the coast, and decimating marine-based industries and tourism is simply too high for a quick buck.
Sadly, as part of yesterday’s drastic state budget May Revision, California once again faces a renewed push to allow oil drilling off the coast of California. Big Oil has essentially offered to California $100 million dollars to seduce the state into granting the first new oil drilling lease in California since the Santa Barbara oil spill 41 years ago, a spill that covered hundreds of miles of ocean and over 30 miles of sandy beaches with more than three million gallons of crude oil. Learning from history means not blindly repeating the mistakes of the past.
More over the flip…
Furthermore, the $100 million loan must be repaid by forgiving future royalty payments to California. This is an incredibly reckless fiscal policy. To drill ourselves out of a recession with this plan is like drinking sea water to quench our thirst. There may be a little temporary relief, but we’ll regret it later. California should be a leader in renewable energy production, not a producer of a polluting product best left in the 20th century. We are selling the coast for short term gain, long term loss, and possibly long term devastation.
The Santa Barbara Oil Spill did have one positive outcome. Many environmental historians suggest that it gave birth to the modern environmentalist movement. We need that enthusiasm again.
John Garamendi is the Lieutenant Governor of California, chair of the California State Lands Commission, and a former Deputy Interior Secretary under President Bill Clinton.
is why I wish John Garamendi was still running for governor.
we can convince him to run?
… company is wanting to do the loan for the lease ?
the City of Los Angeles is trying to buy up the Owens Valley in yet another effort to colonize their way to water independence.
While some of you hope Garamendi runs for Governor, here is on progressive who hopes that sell out Villagairosa does not run. He talks environment like a Governator clone.
Another Comment at UCLA Econ Professor Matthew Kahn’s site. He is much too kind.
Doubtful, but I wish he was.
If he had a more serious outreach to the CA Netroots when he actually was running for Governor I think he candidacy could have gained more traction.
It’s a shame that he found out about this forum only recently now that he is running for CA-10.
(Unless I’m wrong and he regularly posted here and I just happened to miss it – if so then the it’s the frequency of his posting that has increased dramatically.)