Candidate | Support |
Dem Primary | |
Brown | 47 (26) |
Newsom | 27 (16) |
Undecided | 26 (58) |
With DiFi | |
Feinstein | 40 (38) |
Brown | 27 (16) |
Newsom | 16 (10) |
Undecided | 17 (36) |
Republican Primary | |
Whitman | 22 (21) |
Campbell | 20 (18) |
Poizner | 9 (7) |
Undecided | 49 (54) |
October 2009 (March 2009) —–>
And Field decided to, just for the hell of it, throw DiFi in and see how it affected the Dem primary race: —–>
Whereas Brown has significantly improved his position since March, there has been comparatively little change on the GOP side in what’s still a wide-open race:
And the November 2010 matchups:
Republican/Democrat | Whitman | Poizner | Campbell |
| |||
Brown | 29-50-21 | 25-50-25 | 27-48-25 |
Newsom | 31-40-29 | 30-39-31 | 33-38-29 |
Let’s look more deeply at these numbers. There are big divides regionally, generationally, and along gender lines between support for Brown and Newsom. Southern California is breaking 50-19 for Brown, but NorCal shows a much closer race, 43-38. Newsom not only has to raise his profile in SoCal, but has to deal with a 10 point unfavorable margin (30-40).
The generational divide is also pretty stark. Those of us with no memories of Governor Brown, voters age 18-39, back Newsom 41-32. But for those age groups that do remember Governor Brown (even if they were young), Brown leads by 30 points among voters 40-64, and a massive 45 points among voters over 65.
The gender gap is also stark – men support Brown 56-22, compared to 40-31 among women.
So what all does this mean for the race? Newsom hasn’t had a good 2009. He has slipped further behind Brown, and has been unable to turn his numbers around in SoCal. He hasn’t been able to overturn his unfavorables, and as I wrote earlier his inability to offer a clear vision to Californians has meant that the older generations are sticking to their (flawed, in my view) belief that Brown is progressive enough to support for a third term.
In the general election matchups, it’s all about the decline-to-states. Newsom polls about 10 points weaker among Dems than does Brown in the head-to-head matchups, and about 5-10 points weaker among DTS voters. But, crucially, both Democrats have a lead among the DTS voters that will help decide this election.
So as we read the tea leaves on these polls, the bigger picture is starting to become clear: Californians want their next governor to be a Democrat.
As disappointed as I am in both Dem candidates, that does give me hope going into the 2010 cycle.
Notes by Brian: Californians Want A Democratic Governor
To me, what is interesting is the data for Newsom. He is down ten points in favorability (30% favorable to 40% unfavorable) yet he is still beating all of the Republican candidates. In all likelihood, he is the Democrat with the highest unfavorables in the state, or at least amongst candidates who could seriously challenge for the Democratic nomination. In other words, put in any random Democrat, and these numbers are probably your baseline. That is very good data for the Democratic nominee is, whether it is one of the two candidates in play now or if it is a late entrant.
Also interesting is Tom Campbell’s relative strength. He is running his campaign on a shoestring in comparison with the megalithic operations of his two opponents. I’m really not sure what to make of it. Is there really a desire for a relative “moderate” in the GOP electorate? Or is it something more about a “serious” candidate with policy and politics street cred. I think we’ll get better data in future polls to see if Campbell can really maintain these numbers.
This race is still young in many ways, and name ID can still pointed at for much of this data. Jerry Brown is the most recognizable name in the field, and his standing bears that out. None of the Republicans are particularly well known, with no opinion being the leading response to whether the respondents had favorable opinions of the candidates. All of the Republicans had slightly favorable marks (~+5%) but with no opinions hovering around 60+%, favorability doesn’t really mean all that much.
Tom Campbell is the real wildcard in all of this. I’m just not sure if he’s legit in the Republican primary.
I was amazed to see Tom Campbell’s strength in today’s Field Poll. He is a very cerebral guy, pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, supports a gas tax, hits most of the right keys on the environmental piano. So, why is he a Republican?
None of the candidates out there are perfect, so between now and the primary, I need to figure out which blemishes are the least objectionable. If Campbell’s worst attribute is his party affiliation…maybe he is the guy.
I just can’t figure out why he would associate with those people.
Campbell let the Wingnut House impeachment managers twist his arm to vote for impeaching President Clinton. I think alot of people forget that he’s pulled right when it mattered most. Campbell’s brand of ‘fiscal conservatism’ is yanking the chain out from under any social services and padding the pockets of his corporate interests.
It’s disparaging reading positive comments from supposed Democrats around the net today speaking positive about Campbell. He’d get run over by the GOP fanatics in Sacramento. There’s work to do in re-exposing Campbell for what he is – way out of touch with California.
Are Brown and Newsom the best that the democratic party can do? Do they have anyone who would represent a moderate Californian? Or even a moderate democrat?