By Allen Hopper, ACLU of Northern California
California voters came out in droves to support Proposition 19 this November. More than 4.1 million people voted for Prop. 19, which would have allowed adults 21 and older to possess and grow small amounts of marijuana for personal use and allow cities and counties to tax and regulate commercial sales. That’s more votes than Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina garnered. Though the measure didn’t pass, the degree of support marks an undeniable leap forward in the movement to end marijuana prohibition. In the end, Prop. 19 achieved a higher percentage of “yes” votes (46%) than any state-level legalization measure on the ballot over the past decade.
This is clearly only the beginning of a new, more rational public discussion about marijuana. It’s no longer a question of whether marijuana prohibition should end, but rather when and how. Post-election polling data shows that many voters who rejected Prop. 19 nonetheless believe that marijuana should be made legal. Even the leaders of the opposition to Prop. 19 publicly stated that they are not opposed to marijuana legalization, “if it’s done the right way.”
There is already talk about another initiative on the California ballot in 2012, and California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano has pledged to introduce a new statewide tax and regulate bill. And California is not alone in its efforts. Several other states are likely to have legalization or decriminalization on the ballot in the near future, including Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Colorado and Nevada. What we know is that it is clear that states do indeed have the right to decide for themselves whether or not to keep state marijuana prohibition laws on the books.
The war on drugs has failed, and people are ready for a change. The United States has the highest documented incarceration rate in the world. One in every 31 adults is on probation, in jail or in prison. FBI figures show that over 800,000 people in the U.S. are arrested for marijuana offenses each year. The vast majority of these arrests are for low-level, nonviolent simple possession offenses. Drug law enforcement in the United States is a driving force behind some of the worst aspects of our flawed criminal justice system, including tragic racial disparities. People of color are arrested at far higher rates than whites for marijuana offenses, even though rates of drug use are equal across racial lines. According to the Prison Policy Initiative, we incarcerate black men in the United States today at rates more than five times higher than in South Africa during apartheid.
The public is taking notice that ending marijuana prohibition will ease our overwhelmed state and local budgets, and will free up law enforcement resources to address serious and violent crime.
Despite the disappointing outcome, Prop. 19 was a giant step in the right direction. Let’s keep the discussion going.
Allen Hopper is the Police Practices Director at the ACLU of Northern California.
but I voted YES for three reasons:
1. The discriminatory enforcement of prohibition laws.
2. The hurdles that legitimate medical users still must overcome to obtain legal Cannabis.
3. Agricultural hemp for oil and fiber.
Next time, let’s avoid the term “recreational use”. I know that the intent is to distinguish it from “medical use”, but I think the term puts a negative spin on it.
It conjures up images of idlers who would rather spend their Saturday sitting at home in a cloud of smoke rather than playing golf, going windsurfing or taking salsa dancing lessons.
We don’t talk about “recreational wine drinkers” (altho that’s a very good description for folks who spend their weekend driving from one winery to the next, sampling the wares). And we haven’t talked about “medicinal use” of distilled spirits for a couple of generations now.
The liquor industry refer to its products as “beverages”. We need an equally bland euphemism for the consumption of Cannabis.
I know that November elections tend to garner younger voters (who would likely support propositions such as this one) but I think one reason people were deterred from voting for Prop 19 was all of the Halloween “warnings” right before the election by the various Sheriffs’ departments (and widely reported on the news as actual news) that people would be putting pot in children’s candy (of course there was no warnings that people might try to slip alcohol or other drugs into the kids’ candy bags). I am not aware of any reports of this actually happening.
I think if this proposition makes it on the ballot in November of 2012, the same thing will happen.
WTF is the American Civil Liberties Union doing getting involved in this? I voted for 19, I think it’s good public policy, but it’s not a civil rights issue.