In what can only be described as a cynical and calculated move to bait Marcy Winograd into entering the CA36 Congressional race and split the progressive vote, Janice Hahn issued a press release today urging Debra Bowen to join her in a pro-Israel pledge.
The problem isn’t the pledge itself – a fairly standard boilerplate declaration that supports Israel’s right to exist, a two-state solution to the Israeli/Palestinian peace process, and enforcing sanctions against Iran – the problem is the timing of the pledge and it’s explicit attack on Winograd.
Hahn’s press release comes on the heels of a Daily Breeze article which stirred up a hornets nest amongst progressives in the district because of this paragraph:
“I did some hard analysis about where I thought I could best serve this country and this state at this moment in history,” Bowen said. The former lawmaker said she plans to focus on improving education and strengthening jobs in the local aerospace industry while also building up the nation’s military.
Marcy Winograd in particular jumped at the quote, and forwarded her concerns to listserves throughout the district.
I thought I’d share concern expressed on the CDP Progressive Caucus list serve about a Daily Breeze report that Debra Bowen, when announcing her candidacy, indicated that she supported a military build-up. …. For me, this is code for more bomb-building, with no emphasis on transitioning aerospace into Green jobs that we desperately need. Last week I asked her if she would join the Out of Afghanistan Caucus, but never received an answer on that issue.
Bowen quickly sent out a letter to supporters in the district saying she was “stunned” to see her interview characterized as it was, and said she had called the reporter to correct the record.
I’m gravely concerned about the cost of war and the number of lives lost. I think we need a safe and rapid exit from Afghanistan, for one example, and said so very specifically in that interview. I would much rather that these resources go towards jump starting our economy, restoring excellence in our schools and providing quality job training, developing energy independence via green alternatives, improving on health care as it is implemented, and addressing the need for care for the increasing number of seniors with dementia and Alzheimer’s and children with autism, diabetes, and other conditions that threaten their independence and quality of life.
Janice Hahn and her campaign manager, Joe Trippi, would love nothing more than to have Winograd run. With a credible Republican challenger now in the race – Redondo Beach City Attorney Mike Webb – a split vote between Bowen and Winograd would likely eliminate both in the first round of voting.
In the new “open primary” system the two top voter-getters would advance to a second round of voting if no one receives %50+1 of the primary vote. And that’s unlikely with a three or four-way ticket.
Cross posted at Veniceforchange.com
Just out of curiosity, what is so cynical about this pledge. Winograd has been talked about for quite a while as a possible candidate and has always said when asked that she was considering the race and most people have assumed she would run. As for Israel, both Bowen and Hahn have taken support in the past from people who consider support for Israel to be among their top issues. Why is it unethical for Hahn to ask Bowen to commit on the issue. Obviously it’s something voters should know before they elect a member of Congress isn’t it? But beyond all of that, filing hasn’t opened yet and there is a lot of talk about other possible candidates including several Republicans. How about helping to stimulate discussion instead of engaging in phony kingmaking by trying to pick the “progressive” candidate in advance.
Apparently, there’s some confusion about this (including me, originally.)
This election is not effected by Prop 14’s open primary, but it is an open election under California Code Elections Code Section 10705: (My earlier attempt to link wasn’t successful, you can find the full code at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cala… and by searching “Election Code” for “Special.”)
A look at the Prop 14 language does not allow for a 50% winner to skip the general election (see section 5):
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.con…
If no candidate gets 50% in the first round, then you move on to the second round with the top two vote-getters (Section 10706).
This doesn’t change your concerns — they are valid. Just the underlying rules making them so.
Since January 1, 2011, all elections for state and federal office in California are now conducted under the Prop 14 top-two Constitutional Amendment.
The only difference between the special election that will be held in CD 36 (as with those this week in SD 17 & 28) is that if a candidate hits the 50% plus one vote threshold, they are automatically elected, without a run-off (more accurately, without a general election).
If no candidate reaches the % plus one vote threshold, the two top vote-getters, regardless of party, will advance to the run-off (general election).
Eric C. Bauman
the more it looks like an attempt to get AIPAC and related PACS/donors (who had backed harman for years) to back hahn over bowen. best case scenario for hahn is that a) bowen does not take whatever pledge hahn challenges her on, b) winograd sees bowen’s non-signing as insufficient, and runs herself, and c) pro-israel groups take sides in the race and shower hahn with donations and paid media.
i can see trippi trying to swing such a response. not sure it’ll work, though.
There is no longer a question about Debra Bowen as she signed the pledge today. Good for her. It is nice to see that two of the major candidates are united in supporting Israel.