Tag Archives: Nancy Pelosi

Ellen’s Enabling Escalation

The front page of today’s San Francisco Chronicle features a piece by Marc Sandalow on the battle brewing over Bush’s expected plan to escalate in Iraq (known as the McCain Doctrine, “When you’re hip deep in shit, dig faster, until you’re in over your head.”)

Sandalow says:

If the president, as expected, announces his intention to deploy as many as 20,000 additional U.S. troops in Iraq, he may encounter widespread political and public defiance.

It will quickly test the new Democratic majority’s capacity to stand up to the commander in chief in a time of war, and the ability of the legislative branch to seize control of the White House’s controversial foreign policy. […]

“We can see a major clash coming between a Democratic Congress and the administration on this very, very fundamental issue,” said Bruce Riedel, a former member of Bush’s National Security Council and now a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “Not only do most Democrats on the Hill oppose the surge or have serious doubts about it, but more and more Republicans have doubts about the wisdom of the surge.”

While “most Democrats” are smart enough to fight with Pelosi to oppose the escalation, there is one Democrat who already put together the necessary mechanics for such an escalation.

The problem for Bush (beyond the fact this is ridiculous) is that it is physically difficult, there simply aren’t enough troops. Some are now saying the escalation may only number 9,000 because the early numbers floated of 30,000 to 40,000 were impossible.

Which is why talk of an escalation quickly resulted in the headline, Bush comes to Tauscher’s way of thinking.

The problem isn’t that we don’t have enough troops, the problem is that we have too many troops in Iraq. But just as he did in the run-up to the war that Tauscher voted for, Bush is playing her as a fool.

Will she keep digging or will she finally start listening to people like Speaker Pelosi who have been right from the start?

CA-36: Harman hoping to leave Congress?

In the Washington Post, Lois Romano gossips her way through a piece on the rivalry between Jane Harman and Nancy Pelosi, and Harman’s residual anger over being passed over as chair of the House Intelligence Committee.  But there’s a little nugget in there:

She has lamented that Congress has lost its luster for her and that she is hoping for a job in a Democratic administration, according to a friend. “She’s obsessed,” the source said. “It’s been hard for her not to take it personally, but it’s over.”

I don’t know if this means that Harman won’t seek re-election: she likely wants to be in some official position of power.  But she’d leap at the chance to join a Democratic Administration and vacate her Congressional seat, setting up a special election.  Progressives obviously have a strong infrastructure in this district: Marcy Winograd received nearly 40% of the vote in a primary challenge.  Perhaps there won’t be a need for any more primary fights.

It also begs the question of whether Harman is really the best choice for what would almost certainly be an intelligence-related post under a Democratic President.

Why Nancy Pelosi Needs to Bypass the DC Pundits

Due to circumstances beyond our control, Calitics has become one of the home bases for incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In addition to offering her staff the ability to post their own diaries, many of the front-page posters are constituents of Pelosi and we care very deeply whether she succeeds or fails.

During the last half a decade, the DC Press Corp has enabled some of the worst decisions ever made in the history of the United States. Which is why Pelosi would be wise to bypass them every chance she gets and talk directly to the people. It is technologically and physically possible, the only question is whether she will do it. I think the first recognition necessary to make this possible is that the smartest people don’t necessarily live in DC (by definition). Speaking of which, SoCal’s Digby says:

First of all, the idea that Nancy Pelosi has to reach across the aisle, work with George W. Bush and pass legislation that benefits the American people to prove that the Democrats are capable of governing is balderdash. The Republicans will pull every trick in the book to ensure that doesn’t happen and they will probably succeed. They are very good at being a minority and they have absolutely no intention of ever doing anything that will benefit the democratic party. At this point they don’t even have any intention of doing anything that will benefit George W. Bush.

Pelosi has two things she has to do. She has to keep the Republicans on the deefensive throughout the next two years and set the table for a Democratic win in 08. There is no “working with” George W. Bush. He is poison and his political advisors are doing nothing but trying to keep him from being chased out of iraq before he leaves office. Period. They have no other agenda.

Considering all of the attention to the Burtons, Pelosi should do what Phil Burton would do as long as she can communicate a better justification than Burton could for Why she is doing something (again, back to bypassing the DC set).

The DC Press Corps is going to do everything in their power to damn Pelosi for what they never even wrote about the Republicans doing. Pelosi needs to realize this and act accordingly.

She has two options, she let them give it to her the ugly way or she can circumvent those who have been proven wrong again and again. Only the latter will give the American People the policy we deserve.

Ellen Tauscher Weekly, V1.02

If last week was defined by Katie Merrill catapulting a primary campaign against Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, this was the week that Tauscher tried in vain to distance herself from Joe Lieberman.

The following is how the week developed…

ellen tauscherSunday, December 17, 2006 – Sunday morning began where late Saturday night had left off. Before dawn, Crooks and Liars posted with five links to the continuing fallout from Representative Tauscher’s federal staff scrubbing her official government website of “The Caress” picture.

Rain Storm said the picture was, “definitely worth a thousand words” while pointing out, “In case anyone hasn’t been paying attention, the 2008 election cycle has already begun.” A short time later, skippy the bush kangaroo said, “if you enjoyed the lamont run against lieberman, pull up a chair, grab some popcorn and feast your eyes on california district 10, where ellen tascher, aside from being terribly out of touch with her constituents, made the unfortunate gaffe of knocking blogtopia (and she didn’t even acknowledge that yes! we coined that phrase!).”

That afternoon, a front-page post on Calitics looked at Tauscher’s internet blunders and concluded, “the larger problem is that her campaign should lack the ability to hire a netroots consultant who knows better. Working for Tauscher would be a career killer for a blogosphere coordinator and while the money might be good, it would be likely to cost other clients”. A post at Left in SF agreed, “Hiring an internet consultant for the very purpose of insulating the candidate from the internet is a pretty good way to end someone’s career. You’d have to be awfully cynical about politics and pretty contemptuous of the netroots to take that job.”

Monday, December 18, 2006 – Headlining CA-10 as, “Just One Ned Lamont Away From Being The Next CT SEN”, the Hotline Blogometer reported, “Rep. Ellen Tauscher’s (D-CA) vote for the Iraq war, her perceived coziness with K Street and Pres. Bush, have already made her the netroots number one target for ’08’s primary season.”

ellen tauscher joe liebermanThe week’s bombshell came Monday afternoon at Fire Dog Lake. You see, not only did Tauscher’s congressional office scrub photos of her with George Bush, but two pics of Ellen Tauscher with Joe Lieberman were also scrubbed. FDL noted, “The days when you could hire the idiot nephew to run the netroots component of your campaign are long gone.  It should be very interesting to see who might be willing to stand in the line of fire currently being aimed at Tauscher”.

Not surprisingly, getting caught scrubbing Joementum pics was the fastest route to permanently brand Tausher as getting Liebermanned in 2008. A FDL reader set up a new home for the pics and the story hit the front page of Calitics with quotes from Tauscher on why Lieberman was rejected by primary voters during the 2004 presidential campaign. And then the story rocketed to the front page of Daily Kos, “for those who want to know the full case against Tauscher, it will be laid out over the coming year in full.” Ruck Pad suggested anyone thinking of doing netroots outreach for Tauscher, “would be well advised to think twice” and declared the fiasco, “a textbook example on how not to head off a netroots fueled primary.”

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 – The National Journal Blogometer starting things off with, “The samecircles that got such mileage out of naming Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) SOTU embrace of Pres. Bush “the kiss” have now labeled the pre-Iraq-war picture of Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) sitting with Bush’s hand on her lap “the caress.””

Josh Richman won the prize for the first reporter to ask for a comment from the Congresswoman, but he failed to pin down who in Tauscher’s office did the scrubbing or whether the Representative sanctioned the cover-up.

Calitics covered “The Caress” and posted two videos from Tauscher’s town hall meeting with Rossmoor Democrats.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006 – The Berkeley Bubble started the day off with a post headlined, “Ellen Tauscher: The Caress, the Iraq Mess, Forgetting her District’s Address?” and a short time later it was read by a house.gov I.P. address. The House Race Hotline reported, “Emboldened by their role in the Dem sweep, liberal bloggers are now targeting Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA 10), a Bay Area centrist, pro-business Dem in the mold of Joe Lieberman. Her crime? Bloggers perceive her as too cozy with Pres. Bush and big business. And as chair of the New Democratic Coalition, she’s been a proponent of free-trade agreements to the ire of the populist crowd.”

A front-page post at MyDD said, “Calitics is doing good work tracking Ellen Tauscher (including video).  She’s a real problem for Democrats, and should face a serious challenge.” A Calitics diary looked back at the type of candidate who has run against Tauscher in the tenth since redistricting.

Later that day, the San Francisco Chronicle’s Spun Cycle Blog offered a hyperlink-free post that was widely mocked and Carla Marinucci was quickly refuted at Ruck Pad.

Thursday, December 21, 2006 – A Calitics diary looked at Tauscher’s endorsement page from 2006 and notes that neither Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi nor Senator Barbara Boxer made the list.

A MyDD diary (that remained recommended for more than 48 hours) looked back of the major, public feud between Pelosi and Tauscher, “In the end, Tauscher’s two blunders ended up with Burton creating a new 10th District that would remove any fear of Tauscher losing in a general, but one that was specifically designed to allow her to lose in a primary if she kept undermining Pelosi. Tauscher wasn’t redistricted out of a seat, but was given a clear shape up or ship out choice.”

D-Day disputed the Tauscher/Lieberman link, “there’s NOBODY like Joementum when it comes to arrogance, false victimhood, dishonesty, and condescension.”

Friday, December 22, 2006 – The internet tubes were quiet on the last weekday before Christmas, but the 18 year-old high school student we mentioned last week posted his second diary on Calitics and the Rescue Rangers bumped the Pelosi/Tauscher Feud to the front-page of Daily Kos.

Saturday, December 23, 2006 – On Festivus Day, there was but one airing of grievances. A post at Calitics using the Way Back Machine to see Tauscher’s thoughts on her nomination speech for Joe Lieberman.

There should be much, much more next week in the Ellen Tauscher Weekly.

Nancy Pelosi and Ellen Tauscher

Nancy Pelosi and John Burton

Some say the feud between Nancy Pelosi and Ellen Tauscher has always existed. Some say that it that it is a Hatfield-McCoy stories that goes back generations in east coast politics. But one thing is clear, it erupted in the press during the summer of 2001:

The story nonetheless laid bare a dispute that belies the solidarity of Bay Area delegation, arguably the most liberal in the nation. Its origins are a matter of dispute. Some believe Tauscher sees Pelosi as competition. Some believe Pelosi feels betrayed after helping Tauscher first get elected in 1996.

The rift has isolated Tauscher to a certain degree from her California colleagues, who almost universally are behind Pelosi.

“I’ve searched my heart why Ellen Tauscher would not support Nancy Pelosi for whip,” said California Sen. Barbara Boxer, a firm Pelosi backer who was appalled at Tauscher’s assertions. “I cannot figure out in my wildest imagination as to why she is not excited at this history-making prospect. Her doing this says to me she is a very bitter person.”

Boxer wasn’t the only California Democrat who was “appalled” at Tauscher not supporting a fellow woman of the delegation, the move infuriated John Burton (who many people at the time viewed as almost as powerful than the governor and overly protective of Pelosi.

It wasn’t just the fact Tauscher abandoned Pelosi that made the situation so controversial, it was also the manner in which the story exploded:

In a culture where even the worst of political enemies are referred to as “my good friend,” each struggles to find nice things to say about the other.

Their long-running dispute spilled onto the front pages of Roll Call — the newspaper of Capitol Hill — with an eyebrow-raising banner headline: “Pelosi Denies Whip Threats: Tauscher Charges Intimidation” as members were preparing to adjourn for their summer recess.

The Roll Call made no attempt to conceal the fact that the story was all Tauscher’s doing:

Exposing a rift between two of the House’s most powerful women, Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) charged this week that allies of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in the state Legislature are threatening to weaken Tauscher’s district in redistricting as retribution for her decision to back Pelosi’s opponent in the race for party Whip.  […]

The rumors, according to Tauscher and associates both in Washington and California, began soon after.

If Tauscher’s first mistake was shivving Pelosi, her second mistake was to go whining to Roll Call about it:

Tauscher charged that the effort is being led by state Sen. John Burton (D), a former Member of Congress and close Pelosi associate who is now the Senate’s President Pro Tempore. […]

Though he evidently intended to bury the rumors Burton nonetheless made little effort to disguise his contempt for Tauscher, suggesting that she was inviting trouble by voicing her concerns.

“The best way to get a problem with me is to run crying to the press,” Burton said gruffly.

Burton described his close relationship with each of the Members in the Bay Area delegation, but pointedly excluded Tauscher from the list, concluding, “Ellen is not one to determine where her district would be.”

In the end, Tauscher’s two blunders ended up with Burton creating a new 10th District that would remove any fear of Tauscher losing in a general, but one that was specifically designed to allow her to lose in a primary if she kept undermining Pelosi.

Tauscher wasn’t redistricted out of a seat, but was given a clear shape up or ship out choice.

Yet Tauscher was defiant, insisting that she would continue her DLC push to water down the Democratic Party.

Remember, Tauscher’s one of Washington’s rising Blue Dog Democrats — she’s vice chair of the Democratic Leadership Council — and that leaves the liberal Bay Area Democrats feeling blue. […]

“Our party is trending toward districts like mine — coalition swing Democratic districts,” Tauscher said. “The old guard is threatened by us. There’s a real concerted effort to say, ‘We don’t want to grow any more like her.’

“The fact is, I’ve worked hard with my Bay Area colleagues. I don’t rub their noses in the fact that the DLC picked up four seats in the last election.

If we’re going to get the majority (in the House), we need to be more moderate.”

Since then, Tauscher’s side has been rejected by Democrats while Pelosi is about to be sworn in as Speaker.

Not only did Tauscher end up on the wrong side of history, potentially even worse is she ended up on the wrong side of Burton, who does all he can to help Pelosi:

In San Francisco, Pelosi’s friends and allies concede that one adviser stands head and shoulders above the rest: John Burton, the tart-tongued liberal famous for championing the cause of the poor, elderly and homeless in Sacramento and as a House member in Washington. His sister-in-law, the late Rep. Sala Burton, wife of legendary San Francisco Rep. Phil Burton, summoned Pelosi to her deathbed to urge her to run for Congress.

It was Burton’s top goal to get Pelosi the gavel, which has been completed. Now it is time to shore up Pelosi’s support, which begins in a district Burton knows so well you’d think he drew it himself.

Press Notices Bloggers’ Disdain For Tauscher Maneuver

Josh Richman writing in the Contra Costa Times picked up on the blogosphere outrage at Ellen Tauscher undermining Speaker Pelosi by negotiating directly with bush.

“If he’d agree to meet with them every day it would be fantastic,” guest blogger mcjoan wrote on the popular Emeryville-based liberal blog DailyKos.com, launching a thread several hundred comments long.

“But the leadership has to be able to lead, and this move by Bush is an end-run around the leadership,” she wrote. “It’s an effort by the administration to peel away a block of Democrats that have, to the party’s detriment, shown their willingness to buck party leadership. It’s about respecting party leadership, staying unified within the caucus, and maintaining the strength that will be necessary to get good legislation passed. A unified caucus will be able to accomplish more. This move fractures the caucus.”

Mr. Richman deserves credit for noticing the online angst Tauscher’s move has generated, with Democratic bloggers disgusted to see Pelosi’s leadership publicly undermined before she is even sworn in as Speaker.

Yesterday, Calitics had three front page posts on Ellen Tauscher (1, 2, 3), which shouldn’t surprise anyone who has followed online bloggers’ disgust with Tauscher’s actions before and after the election.

In fact, every time Tauscher undermines the Democratic Party, it provides fuel for progressive bloggers, as Chris Bowers explained:

Here is why I will continue to fgiht: because as long as Ellen Tauscher and her ilk are running the Democratic Party, the conservative movement will continue to rise. Ellen Tauscher can’t beat the conservative movement. She and her friends showed us this time and time again from 1978-2004 just how utterly ineffective they are at doing anything except ushering in a new era of Republican dominance. As long as they are in leadership positions of the Democratic Party, the only avenue available to stop the conservative movement on the electoral front, this country that I love so dearly will continue on a long, downward spiral. Both defeating Republicans and wiping their Democratic enablers out of power is the only way to save my country.

Ellen Tauscher, just so you know, when you have a surprisingly strong and well funded primary challenger with tons of volunteers and lots of support in the progressive media come out of seemingly nowhere in 2008, just look over the cliff to see where that challenger is coming from. At the bottom, you will see me standing there, with hundreds and thousand of my friends and colleagues. We will be in the process of forming a human ladder for your challenger to use to climb up the cliff. When s/he reaches the top, don’t be surprised if more than a few of us come along, and suddenly you find yourself outnumbered, even as you stand next to your twenty-seven new friends. And then we will see who gets run over the cliff next.

With Tauscher showing no signs of having learned for the election results and bloggers clearly tracking her moves, the 2008 primary election in CA-10 has the potential to be more than failure to extend employment, it is shaping up like a movement.

Odds and Ends 11/21

Another day comes and goes.  Lou Correa is officially the victor, and with that, the California elections in 2006 are officially over. Thank goodness.  That dragged on for quite a while, huh? Ok, today’s news teasers: Marc Cooper and Harry Reid, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the California GOP, and Latino voters, CCPOA pay hikes, Harman and Pelosi, and Sacto’s message to the NBA.  And some other stuff…

  • Marc Cooper is agitating against Harry Reid already, mostly on solid grounds.  On Nov. 17, Marc questioned Reid’s support of a quick go-ahead for Robert Gates as SecDef, and on Nov. 19 Mark was none too pleased about Reid’s call for an additional $75 Billion for Iraq. However, he does seem overly agitated about a still-nascent majority.
  • The feud between Harman and Pelosi – does it matter? Personally, I’d prefer they stuck with seniority, it creates less opportunity for corruption. But, if you want some background on the dispute, check out that article. It tells you probably a bit more than you’d ever want to know about the roots of the dispute.
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger got about 39% of the Latino vote.  Exactly why he got that number is not exactly clear, but certainly don’t read it as a great gain for the GOP in California.  In other races, McClintock only garnered 23% and Pooch only got 21%.  These numbers are more representative of the far-Right GOP can expect in the future, especially if they pursue their agenda against immigrants.  The GOP chose the anti-immigrant bandwagon, now sit there and be quiet. Arnold apologized about his MinuteMen comments, and as much as I think it was insincere, people accepted that, and he endorsed the moderate Senate immigration bill also helped.  Certainly McClintock and his ilk will have more difficulties trying to sway Latino voters.
  • The CCPOA won their members a 3% pay hike. More money for prisons, but still no answers.
  • More Indian casinos in Richmond? It could happen, but the stumbling point appears to be whether they can show connection with the land.  Back to history class folks…
  • Sacramento and Seattle told the NBA to back off, Dan Weintraub has some suggestions. He’s more polite than me.  My opinion: Learn how to balance a freaking budget.
  • My first pug, which my parents got when I was in high school, just died.  He had cancer and it was his time. He was a venerable 14 years, and was quite simply, a great dog.  He was sweet and playful, and I will miss him.  Pugsley’s the fawn one, the black one is my pug, Popeye.
    Pugsley and Popeye Pugsley, 1992-2006
  • Odds and Ends 11/17

    Well, this one’s a bit on the late side, so I guess it will also serve as a weekend appetizer.  Teasers: Ellen Tauscher…grrr, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, Arnold shakeup?, and an earlier primary?  More over the flip…

    I’ve been meaning to compliment Jon Fleischman on these pages, but I never got around to it.  He recently added a blogscan feature that is a bit easier to use than Around the Capitol’s blogscan.  It lets you sort by left, right, and neither.  Pretty handy.

  • Lots of stories about Pelosi’s “failure” with Murtha. (SF Chron, LAT, Oak Trib)  Most of them say that this indicates that she’s going to be a failure.  You know what it says to me? She knows who her friends are, and who will stab her in the back at the first opportunity. Murtha has been one of Nancy’s biggest supporters, even though they frequently disagree on the issues.  Hoyer? Yeah, not so much.  I’m not making too much out of this.  I think it’s just a case of Hoyer having too many chits to call in.  I wouldn’t worry that Nancy is about to be ousted.
  •  

  • Some people may remember how I got ticked off by the reporting of one Lisa Vorderbrueggen of the CoCo Times over her continued denial about the CA-11 race.  You see, she really, really didn’t want to believe that Jerry was a serious candidate.  Oops! I guess she got that one wrong.  Well, now she’s charting the rise of Ellen Tauscher.  Apparently ET didn’t learn anything from Marcy Winograd’s primary challenge to her fellow “New Democrat Coalition” member Jane Harman.  CA-10 is a 60% Kerry district, but that sure doesn’t show in ET. We’re watching you ET…
  •  

  • Will California move up its primary in 2008? Well, Steve Maviglio of CA Majority Report fame, who also happens to work for Fabian Nunez, the speaker of the assembly, thinks that we should be more important in choosing the candidates.  Not a bad idea, but the DNC and RNC might be a bit skeptical as we have some very pricey media markets.
  •  

  • Oh no! The airport hotels in LA might be required to pay a living wage rather than slave wages. The sky would certainly fall if they could put food on their table and the stockholders got a few less bucks.
  • Hey, Bill Bradley (Pajamas Media) noticed that there were some initiatives on the ballot! That only took, what, ten days?  He’s like a cheetah, that Bill Bradley.
  • A shake-up in the Schwarzenegger house? Advisers are ditching; I guess he has to make way for Team Arnold 4.0.  So, maybe he’ll bring in Stallone for this one.
  • Dan Lungren lost his bid for Republican Conference Secretary. Aww, shucks.
  • Have a great weekend!!
  • Odds and Ends 10/30/06

    Let’s get straight to it… Teasers: Duncan Hunter for president (no, really), Nancy Pelosi…doing Pelosi stuff, the cash path, Jerry McNerney, and Charlie Brown is a tough SOB. 

    Move along past the flip.

  • CA-11: Those lies that Pombo is spreading that McNerney wants North Korea to have nukes? Well, it’s a wink-wink message to his voters that he’s tough. Ugh, if you mean tough on the environment, I could agree.  On foreign policy? Stupidly brazen does not equal tough. Well, I guess it does if you’re a loyal Bush Republican. And oh yeah, Pombo doesn’t think Iraq is relevant to the election.
  • CA-04: Speaking of tough, Charlie Brown is the smart kind of tough that we need in Congress. Brown will actually push to investigate the war profiteering, just as Harry Truman did during WWII. War profiteering is a disgusting crime that puts corporate profits over the safety of our soldiers.  So, GOP, if you ask about all the investigations that will be launched when we take back Congress, look directly at Halliburton.  Where is that money going, and why is not going to our troops?  Brown understands that we need a real policy in Iraq, not just W’s “stay the course” BS.
  • LT. Gov: George Skelton likes the Lt. Governor’s race, just not the actual position of Lt. Gov. Both Garamendi and McClintock will give you the “straight talk” that the media loves.  But, only McClintock is totally and completely insane.  The man wants to completely trash the minimum wage.  No, I’m serious, the man thinks that there should not be a minimum wage at all. It’s true, he said it.
  • The LAT says Pelosi’s a centrist in San Francisco , I would argue that she’s actually quite conservative for San Francisco. Her ruling out of impeachment shows that.  There is actually a referendum on SF’s ballot that asks whether we should officially support impeachment.  It has a pretty good shot of passing. Now, personally, I’m not a fan of that particular referendum, I don’t think it really does anything, so why bother? However, it will serve as a somewhat useful thermometer of San Francisco’s political temperature.  I don’t always support Pelosi on the issues, but she has been remarkably successful.  She has done what others around her in the progressive wing of the party who have served just as long have failed to do.  She has been a strong voice for our party, and even her conservative SF values are a heck of a lot better than Denny Hastert’s values.
  • More on Pelosi: The NYTimes notes that she is now serving as a lightening rod.  Well, duh, Nancy Pelosi, no matter her successes or failures will always be a lightening rod.  And that’s not particularly a bad thing.  She has created a message consistency in the Democratic Party that has been unseen for a long period of time.  And that, my friends, is real toughness.
  • Legislators in Sacramento are bringing in the donations, and then greasing the skids with them.  It’s a bit incestuous, no?  Want a change? Vote Yes on Prop 89.
  •   OMFG! I’m laughing so hard…This is just rich! Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Alpine) is going to run for president. You know, Lemon chicken and 2 veg? Apparently, he thinks the Republicans really need to stand up for neoconservatism. No, really, this is serious, the man is going to run for president.  He may be powerful in the House, but he has a name ID slightly higher than me. Ok, that’s all for now…hahahahahahahaha