(Ain’t that the truth? – promoted by atdleft)
I guess it’s true there are lies, dang lies, and Wall St. Journal editorials. Now they’re aiming at the healthcare debate-which might be good news if it means they’re worried about progress. The Journal looks at the demise of Illinois’ terrible healthcare plan and sees the death of universal healthcare and of healthcare guaranteed with single-payer financing. Both not true. We’ll look at what they say and why-and point out a couple of much more honest assessments after the flip…
Brought to you by the National Nurses Organizing Committee as we organize to make 2007 the Year of GUARANTEED Healthcare.
“Universal” government health care has once again returned as a political cause, with many Democrats believing it’s the key to White House victory in 2008. They might want to study last week’s news from Illinois, where Democratic Governor Rod Blagojevich’s tax increase to finance health care became the political rout of the year.
First of all, let’s realize why Blagojevich needed a tax cut: because his lame plan is built on increasing public subsidies to the same private, for-profit insurance companies that are destroying healthcare in this country.
By contrast, guaranteeing healthcare with the single-payer model that has succeeded in every other country would save us hundreds of millions of dollars a year. So Blogojevich screwed up here by following the herd of other politicians.
That said, you won’t find the Journal crusading against insurance industry bloat, denial of care, and malfeasance, will you? Instead they’re hoping to Hillarycare this issue: attack politicians who cut deals with the insurance industry, and hope to kill all healthcare reform along the way.
The good news is that plans built on increasing insurance company revenues will never work and will leave America eager for genuine solutions to the problem. So it’s going to be much harder for the Journal to stall genuine reform again.
But a funny thing happened on this road to Canadian health care. The state’s more rational Democrats revolted, arguing it would drive businesses out of Illinois.
Ah, the big lie.
Frankly we could stand to learn a little something from Canada, as their people lead longer, healthier lives than we do in a demonstrably better and chaeaper healthcare system.
But this plan isn’t Canada. It’s much more of the same: throw more money at the insurers and hope to do it in a decisive way.
The Journal knows that’s true but they got greedy. First they wanted to kill all healthcare reform, now they’re trying to kill the guaranteed healthcare or “single-payer” proposals specifically, by pretending that is what is being rejected. It’s a non-sequiter.
But what’s bizarre is that businesses are fleeing the U.S. because we saddle them with such a huge competitive disadvantage. Any employer would rather operate in Canada and never have to worry about worker healthcare than operate in the U.S. and watch insurance premiums gobble up all the profits.
Why aren’t our business leaders jumping up and down to get everyone covered with a simple, straightforward system? They’re losing gobs money to increasing premiums…but they don’t seem to care. Why not? Lack of courage? Lack of insight? Herd mentality? Something else? It’s one of the great mysteries of this debate
As for national Democrats, Presidential candidate John Edwards has already proposed a huge tax increase to pay for national health care. At least he’s honest about what such promises require, but we doubt it will help his Presidential prospects. Illinois Senator Barack Obama has been silent on his Governor’s tax implosion, but someone should get him on the record. And Hillary Clinton, well, we can’t wait to see how “universal” her promises will be.
And here’s the game. The Journal is also preparing for 2009, and trying to shut down healthcare reform.
Those of us who care about the issue need to be organizing now, so that when George Bush is finally replaced we have the political heft to force our new President to act boldly and decisively about healthcare. This struggle will be won or lost by what we do over the next year and a half-not IN a year and a half.
For a refreshing breath of healthy fresh air, check out this column about Illinois from the Physicians for a National Health Program, and this column about Massachusetts from Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association.
To join the fight for guaranteed healthcare (with a “Medicare for All” or SinglePayer financing), sign up with GuaranteedHealthcare.org, a project of the National Nurses Organizing Committee. You can help the fight by sharing your story about surviving the healthcare industry here.