Tag Archives: SB 840

Stockton Board of Education supports a single payer health care system

x-posted from California Notes

On February 27 State Senator Sheila Kuehl introduced SB 840, a single payer health care plan for California. At the press conference Kyle Harvey, a carpenter with the Stockton Unified School District, told reporters,

Last summer our school district narrowly averted a strike. The reason [for the strike], the rising cost of healthcare. Four years ago we paid $5 out of pocket monthly for health insurance. Three years ago the price went to $40 per month, two years ago it went to $180, last year we were requested to pay over $400 per month.

As an example of what this meant, we had workers who were forced to choose between paying their mortgage or buying insurance. Maria, a sheriff’s widow and one of our food service workers, faced this choice. She could either sell her home and buy insurance, or keep her home, put her kids on Healthy Families, and go without her own insurance.

Fortunately, we were able to come up with a compromise and averted the strike. Thankfully, Maria was able to keep her home and insurance – that is for now.

This year, once again, we are facing double digit rate increases for the fifth year in a row. We cannot continue a system that raises costs and lowers benefits year after year.

Fortunately for Harvey and his co-workers, the Stockton Unified School District Board of Education is supporting single payer health care for California. Citing a “strong link between healthy children and student achievement,” the board passed a resolution last week which “affirms its support for a California single payer health care plan.”

“Once this plan is enacted, we will be able to concentrate on educating our kids, not jumping through hoops to find affordable comprehensive care,” says Harvey.

In the resolution which passed with only one dissenting vote board members noted, “a basic employer interest in the health and welfare” of employees. Employee health care has a direct impact on efficiency and productivity they said. If more employers would recognize the connection between employee health and productivity perhaps there would be more emphasis placed on finding ways to provide employees with affordable and comprehensive health care, like single payer.

Health care isn’t only an issue in school districts. Public and private employees everywhere are feeling the impact of increasing insurance cost, cuts in services, and insuring retirees. “The lack of affordable health care is a crisis of growing proportion in our local community, California and in the nation as a whole,” the Stockton Board said in their resolution.

Stockton Unified has chosen to support a solution that benefits the broader community. They noted findings from a January 2005 analysis of a proposed California single payer health care plan conducted by the Lewin Group. The report “confirmed that by pooling California’s purchasing power; creating efficiencies, and greatly reducing the administrative costs of health care, that all Californians would receive affordable, quality health care with the creation of a California single payer health care plan.”

If a single payer health care plan, such as SB 840, were in place now, Stockton Unified would save an estimated $10 million to $17 million. That’s money that could go toward actually teaching kids and improving schools.

The Board also noted “skyrocketing health care costs” which create serious economic problems for both employers and employees. With money diverted toward health care, wages and pensions are undermined. This increases the number of uninsured and under insured and places “a significant strain on funding for public institutions.” It also places significant strain on the rest of us who end up paying for the uninsured.

Stockton Unified has taken the lead among school districts, now it is time for the rest to get on board and pass their own resolutions. Resolutions supporting single payer should also be coming from cities, counties, and special districts. In an earlier post I wrote,

It makes sense that school boards would endorse single payer as a health care solution. Millions of dollars could be saved, if single payer becomes a reality. That’s money that would then be freed up to be used improve education and enhance student programs. Certainly employees would make their claim on the new money, and that will have a direct positive impact on schools as well.

Let’s hope that school boards across the state follow Stockton’s lead and support single payer health care in California.

Stockton Unified is leading the way in what could become another groundswell of support for single payer. Having more public employers join them in support will greatly enhance the opportunities that, at the very least, a pilot program can be established to prove the claims of a single payer system. At most, single payer becomes a reality in California and the nation.

Blog Roundup for February 26, 2007

OK, Blog Roundup for today is on the flip. No teasers — sorry to those who enjoy them (both of you).

Consider this an open thread, yada yada.

National News

  • Duncan Hunter (R-CA-52) is running for President, apparently on a platform endorsing Screw the Buddhists and kill the Muslims and creationism.
    http://www.theliberaloc.com/2007/02/24/pot-or-kettle-rep-hunter/
    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/02/24/will-malkin-et-al-denounce-duncan-hunter-too/
  • It’s funny (in a doesn’t-make-you-laugh kind of way) because it’s true:  California is one big ATM for national Dems
    http://couragecampaign.org/entries/atm-watch-the-courage-campaign-2008-presidential-candidate-track/
  • janinsanfran (and Code Pink) were at Sen. HRC’s San Francisco fundraiser on Friday.  Lotsa pictures of the donor class.
    http://happening-here.blogspot.com/2007/02/hillary-breezes-through-in-gusty.html

State Politicians

  • At California Progress Report, Cathy Calfo argues that California Republicans’ ongoing support for the continued occupation of Iraq may eventually harm them politically.  Ah, the Green Lantern theory of geopolitics — if wishes were ponies…
    http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/02/wake-up_call_fo.html
  • American River Canyon at DailyKos went to both of 15% Doolittle’s “listening” sessions over the weekend:  Grass Valley and Auburn.  Doolittle is a wingnut robot.  Seriously.
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/24/152346/501
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/25/2141/53754
  • Joe Scott on Schwarzenegger on Politico.com
    http://www.joescott3.com/index.php/js/permalink/arnold_goes_national/
  • Howie Klein has a short piece on the search for a Dem challenger to Gary “Gordon Gecko” Miller (R-CA-42).
    http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/02/gary-miller-may-have-real-problems-even.html
    https://calitics.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1948

Health Care

Environment

Everything Else

  • SF Bay immigrant communities are sponsoring a week of events in response to the recent ICE raids and detentions.
    http://edjustice.blogspot.com/2007/02/sf-bay-immigrant-communities-fight-back.html
  • There’s a strike brewing in the running CSU faculty labor dispute.
    http://speakoutca.org/archives/2007/02/cal_state_unive.php
  • The CA Majority Report reports on Y.A.RD.I. (Yet Another Redistricting Initiative).  Whooptie-dooo!  Yeee-aw, nevermind.
    http://camajorityreport.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=9&aid=1509
  • So, it appears that the Los Angeles business community is hoping for some “judicial activism”, as they prepare to sue to stop the new living wage ordinance.  The important lesson for those on the side of working people:  it’s not about consistency or principle — it’s about money and power.  When the money party talks about “principle”, it’s a weapon, not a value.
    http://workingcalifornians.com/blog/julia_rosen/2007/02/22/living_wage_lawsuit_coming

Locals Only

Calitics

Sheila Kuehl SLAMS Schwarzenegger on Veto Threat

(cross-posted at The California Courage Campaign)

Earlier today, Arnold Schwarzenegger promised to veto SB 840, State Senator Sheila Kuehl's universal health care bill that passed the legislature last week.

The Republican governor said the single-payer system proposed by Sen. Sheila Kuehl would "cost the state billions and lead to significant new taxes on individuals and businesses, without solving the critical issue of affordability. 

"I won't jeopardize the economy of our state for such a purpose," the governor said in a statement.

Sheila Kuehl slammed him in a response released shortly ater his announcement:

“I suppose the number of erroneous and misleading statements made by the Governor on SB 840 were inevitable since he consistently refused to meet even once with me for a factual presentation on what the bill would actually do for California .” 

This follows on the heels of Angelides's tough denouncement of the governor:

"It's a signal when he vetoes it of his failure to do anything on the issue of health care."

Over the flip, more of Kuehl's smackdown.

“The Governor is engaging in conservative-speak to call the bill ‘socialized medicine’ since all providers of healthcare would have remained as they now are, public or private, under the bill.  That’s 180 degrees from ‘government run healthcare’, a phrase coined by the insurance industries and parroted by the Governor.  Under SB 840, healthcare providers work, as they now do, for private concerns or public healthcare systems.  The big difference is that, under 840, every person would have been able to select their own physician, dentist, hospital, or pharmacy, and there would have been no unreimbursed care.  Doctors would have done a great deal better under this bill than they do now under the thumb of insurance companies.” 

And…

“The Governor makes an even bigger mistake in saying the bill would cost new money or there would be new taxes and no help to affordability.  Such a statement shows that he has not read the bill, doesn’t understand the bill, or is being completely misdirected by his handlers.  In truth, premiums to be paid by businesses and individuals under SB 840 would have taken the place of all premiums, co-pays and deductibles we now pay, saving almost every person and business who now pays for healthcare significant money.  In addition, where there are no cost controls at all now, and enormous administrative overhead and profit for insurance companies, there would have been a transparent system that actually would succeed in making healthcare coverage affordable in California .”