Tag Archives: civil unions

Utah Think Tank Challenges “Common Ground” with “Sacred Ground”

As a response to post Prop 8 comments from local LDS Church leaders and a supportive poll of Utah voters on an openness to equal rights for the LGBT community, several Utah legislators — working with Equality Utah — put together the Common Ground Initiative, in an attempt to create a dialog, and encourage Mormon leaders (who have undoubtedly large influence over legislative policy in the state) to make good on their statements.

In response, The Sutherland Institute, Utah’s leading (only) think tank and Heritage Foundation offspring — infamous here for holding an “Earth Day” event hosted by Roy Innis and other energy industry hacks — has pieced together their own campaign to counter the adult discussions with petty divisiveness titled Sacred Ground. (pdf)  They’ve scheduled several “State of the Union – Stand Up for Marriage” events here locally (targeting bloggers, legislators, and local media) hosted by Utah’s worst Wing-nut (and believe me that’s saying a lot) LaVar Christensen (Direct Quote: “Tolerance is the religion of people who no longer believe in anything.”) , and completing the campaign with a published book and YouTube campaign.

What is notable about this vindictive effort to oppose a rational dialog between Utah legislators and religious leaders before it even begins is not the content, or the fact that Sutherland is aggressively campaigning against equality. Their fear of change is to be expected.  What stands out is the creativity and thoroughness of their campaign, which involves complete media outreach — which I’ve been subjected to almost daily as a local radio host and blogger — and a full (and also first time, for the state) embrace of “new media.”  Their efforts to target bloggers glares especially, as it surpasses the outreach seen so far from either the minority Democratic Party, or the near super-majority state Republican Party.

Sutherland’s campaign not only poses a threat to any meaningful discussion and inclusive legislation here in Utah, but it also stands to circumvent the (admittedly tepid) efforts of the Utah Democratic Party and other activist groups to build online outreach and a coalition behind the “Common Ground” Senators and other progressive policies.

In essence, despite recent polling that shows Utahn’s are open to equality based legislation, Sutherland stands a real chance of winning this one within the state simply by getting their irresponsible message out further and faster.

Watch Sutherland’s “Sacred Ground” video here

UPDATE: We’ll host an on air discussion today with Michael Mueller of Utahns for Marriage Equality. Live stream/chat begins at 4pm (MST).  Click to join in. Podcast will also be available after the show.

Newsom’s Attack on Obama Betrays His Support for Gay Marriage

As San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom barnstormed gay bars in Texas this weekend on behalf of Hillary Clinton, he attacked Barack Obama for opposing same-sex marriage. Although both contenders share opposition to gay marriage, only Obama has pledged to repeal the entire federal law which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages performed by the states.

The Houston Chronicle reports that Newsom told a recent crowd “I was very disappointed when Barack Obama said he didn’t see any difference between civil union and marriage. To me it was very hurtful; particularly coming from someone in the African American community who understands separate is not equal.”

As a supporter of full marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples, I share Newsom’s disappointment with Obama. But I hold the same level of disappointment with Hillary who only supports civil unions and her husband Bill who signed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act into law.

Hillary, ever-mindful of supporting her husband’s legacy has only vowed to roll back a portion of the law to allow same-sex couples to access federal benefits.

That position only supports civil unions which Newsom must be uncomfortable with, while Obama pledges to repeal the entire separate and unequal law to allow individual states to determine marriage rights for same-sex couples.

Does Newsom possess any political integrity on an issue he became so famous for across the country?

Must Obama be held to a higher standard because he comes from the African American community?

Does Newsom prefer Clinton triangulation over the values of gay rights?

It appears as if Newsom conveniently ignores the inadequacy of his candidate’s position in an effort to motivate gay voters in Texas to support the former first lady in Tuesday’s tightly contested primary and caucuses.

There is nothing wrong with supporting one candidate over another, but Newsom ought to maintain some personal and political integrity towards the issue because in politics we have no permanent friends, only permanent issues.