Doolittle’s $82,000 Richer With More to Come

TPM revisits Representative John Doolittle’s (CA-4) lucrative financial arrangement with his wife that put 15% of every campaign contribution directly into the family bank account.

Since some of the fattest months of the fundraising cycle are still to come, I guess it’s conceiveable that the Doolittles could stash away more from this de facto bribe system than John’s congressional salary.

According to this from Dump Doolittle, John and Julie have put more money in their pockets from campaign contributions that Doolittle’s leading Democratic competitor has collected.

Yet, voters will continue to vote for crooks like Doolittle because they are Republicans. How many votes do you think Randy “Duke” Cunningham would have pulled in from prison, if his name had shown up on the 50th District ballot? I say he would have finished no worse than fourth, even if his title on the ballot were “convicted felon.”

California Blog Roundup, 4/16/06

California Blog Roundup for this rainy Easter Sunday. Teasers: Prop 82 con and con, Field Poll results and spin, 15% Doolittle, CA-11, rabid Republicans, some news in the campaign for Governor, some global warming, some sound principles for infrastructure, and some miscellany.

Prop 82

  • Governor Schwarzenegger swings from appearing moderate by backing Proposition 82 to appeasing his corporate backers by opposing. Again, I wonder what big business doesn’t like about a tax which falls solely on high-earning individuals… What could it be? What could it be?
  • Bill Bradley reports that John Burton, liberal firebrand, comes out against Prop 82 because the guarantee of universal preschool subsidizes people who don’t need the subsidy. I’m sympathetic to this criticism — you put the money where it’s needed — but one of the things we’ve learned in the United States is that once you make something into a program for the least fortunate among us, it turns into a target for the least generous among us.

Field Poll Fun

  • ABC has the headlines from the big 3 NorCal papers’ Field Poll articles on Schwarzenegger. I think they can be summed up as “lukewarm”. Also, here’s the Schwarzenegger vs. Angelides / Westly summary.
  • ABC again on the lead that Steve Westly has purchased himself. They note that Mark DiCamillo thinks the lead is surprisingly large. I’m not surprised by DiCamillo’s spin on that; I’ve read some comments by DiCamillo in the past suggesting strongly that DiCamillo is not politically neutral, at least in his commentary.
  • Frank Russo of the California Progress Report notes that the same Field Poll suggests that the anti-immigrant nativists are a definite minority in California.

Doolittle / CA-04

Pombo / CA-11

  • Progressive 11th notes that Richard Pombo will be receiving an award from Exxon on April 25, thanking him for his service.
  • Say No To Pombo has a bit more information on the FEC filings of the major Dem candidates. For some fun inside baseball, make sure to read the comments. Apparently Filson’s financial director has been less than forthcoming about his relationship to the Filson campaign.

Campaign for Governor

Environment

This ‘n’ That

50th CD Newspaper Bashes Busby – Fair and Balanced

The opinion section of the 50th District’s “newspaper of record,” The North County Times, bashes Francine Busby in a series of articles.

The opinion sections top story is an attack on Busby by Nathan L. Gonzales, who we are told is the political editor of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report.  Gonzales lays into Busby and tells us that her campaign is a failure.

This week’s election was not a win for Democrat Francine Busby. She was the top vote-getter in an 18-candidate field, but she was the only serious Democrat in the race compared with a half-dozen active Republican candidates who split the larger Republican vote

For Busby, the first 44 percent of the vote she garnered was the easy part, but the last 6 percent she will need to win will be much more difficult. Her performance was unimpressive considering she received roughly the same percentage that Sen. John Kerry , D-Mass., received in the district (44 percent) against President George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election.

President Bush and the Republicans have endured virtually 16 straight months of bad news and falling poll numbers since then, and Busby’s inability to break through the Democratic ceiling in this special election should make Democrats uneasy.

How nonpartisan is Gonzeles?  See below.

According to Gonzales, Busby failed……..Game over. But, wait, is Gonzales truly nonpartisan? The NC Times cites his association with the Rothenberg Political Report, which Matt Stoller of MyDD finds to be a lot more Republican in its bias. You would think that the NC Times might actually look at where much of Gonzales’ other political writing surfaces. It would have found Gonzales all over the conservative Townhall political opinion site, where Gonzales is a frequent “guest contributor.”

For the sake of balance the NC Times gave us dueling opinion pieces from the two county party chairs. The reason Republicans own the 50th District couldn’t be made more clear than in the two contrasting messages.

Democratic Party chair, Jess Durfee, tells us what Busby would do were she to be elected to congress.  His commentary is simple, unexciting and undistinguished.

On the other hand, Republican Party chain, Ron Nehring, raises every Rovian talking point and attacks Busby at every opportunity. Nehring learned his trade from the best. He stands proudly at the right hand of Grover Norquist and remains a “senior consultant” at Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform, an organization that helped Norquist’s close friend, Jack Abramoff, launder money.

The NC Times offers one additional piece of analysis.  This from SDSU political science professor, Carole Kennedy.  Kennedy, a liberal, provides the most balanced analysis.

Turnout in Tuesday’s election was predictably dismal, in spite of the expenditure of millions and millions of dollars by all candidates, the saturation levels of political advertising on television, and well-funded get-out-the-vote operations on both sides. The outcome suggests, however, that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats were particularly effective in getting their supporters to the polls. In spite of an all-out effort by Democrats, they could not squeeze the necessary votes to avoid a runoff, and the Busby campaign had to be looking over their shoulder at the recent mayoral race where Democratic candidate Donna Frye handily came out on top against a divided Republican field, only to lose just as handily when she ran one-on-one against Jerry Sanders. On the other hand, Democrats point to the contested Democratic gubernatorial primary in June as having the potential for increased interest and turnout among Democratic supporters as reason for hope.

Not much comfort after the NC Times has allowed the Republican hatchets to take aim at Busby, while leaving her only Durfee’s lukewarm defense.