Jackie Speier — the positive choice

As a Southern California resident, I’m disgusted with John Garamendi’s attack ads against Jackie Speier. I am so impressed with Jackie’s positive ads; they really emphasize her character and accomplishments. She is a strong enough candidate to promote herself in an entirely positive manner.

Don’t we want to elect people in California who can run on their own merits? I was already voting for Jackie because of her record on standing up for women, protecting financial privacy, and her goals of using the LG position to truly serve California public universities. But Garamendi’s attacks would have pushed me over the edge, even if I hadn’t already made up my mind.

A response to Kos on the Governor’s race.

Kos let out one of his patented rants today.  This one regards the state of our Governor’s race:

So what do you do when your two gubernatorial aspirants, Steve Westley and Phil Angelides, let their primary battle degenerate into a disgusting, slimy pit of bullshit attack ads and surrogate whisper smear campaigns?

I quit. I hate them both. Someday, California Democrats will have the option to choose from candidates who inspire, not the Gray Davises, Cruz Bustamantes, and the two candidates currently stinking up the Democratic side of the ticket.

The sad thing is that we need a strong turnout for this race to help Francine Busby win in CA-50. But the way this is going, if I want to vomit and throw out my absentee ballot, I can’t imagine what it’s doing to less tuned-in and political Californians, especially in that district. (dKos 5/30/06)

So, first of all, one thing that you can say is that Kos is completely independent of his advertisers.  Steve Westly has been running ads on Kos for a while now.  In fact if you go the page I linked to you will find an ad for Westly right next to the rant about how he sucks.  So, well, good for you Kos.  On the other hand, I think his frustration is somewhat misplaced.  I posted a comment, but well, you know those get lost.  So, I thought I would talk about it a little here.  Here are snippets of my comment:

The lack of funds (caused mostly by the ridiculous concept of homeowners paying a far larger share of property taxes than businesses) is hampering how we do business.  The obvious result of the shortfalls on cash and the fact that a minority has a veto power leaves us with an ALMOST ungovernable state.  Toss the initiative process in there and then you have a hulablaoo.

That being said, I have to disagree with Kos.  Yes the race has turned ugly.  I’ve been bitching about it for a while over at Calitics (mandatory plug here: We’re a scoop community blog focused solely on California politics).  The funny thing is that it started off really well.  They were both going after Arnold.  But then fricking “serpent-tongued” garry South had to start opening his mouth.  He started with that “Positive campaign pledge” that made Westly look foolish because South was attacking Angelides at every turn.  Angelides  responded and the race to the bottom was on.

But there are some good, exciting politicians in California.  Just look down the ballot: the Lt. Governor’s race is great.  Speier and Garamendi are both great candidates, and Figueroa…well she’s exciting.  Look past Governor Moonbeam and you’ll see a lot more interesting people running.  The Contorller’s race has been a very well run race.  Joe Dunn has run a great campaign focusing on his investigations of Enron, and John Chiang has run a fairly clean campaign as well.

Angelides and Westly are victims of the system that has developed in California.  They let their consultants convince them that they needed to go negative.  I don’t think it will make a huge difference in the general, but it certainly won’t help.

I think what I also need to include in that response is that these guys will be much better governors than Arnold.  Yes, they have run poor campaigns for the last 3 months or so, but is that a reason to just give up?  Hardly.  I mean, didn’t we all want to scream at Kerry sometimes in 2004 (say…the time when he didn’t bother to release his military records to end the Swift Boat crap).  Yet, we didn’t give up on him.  I think it’s easier for people to give up on state races, perhaps because they don’t feel like it’s quite as important as the presidency or a Senate seat or something like that.  But thinking that the states don’t matter contributed to our downfall on the federal level.  We are naive if we think that we can build a party without the states.

California is a leader in so many ways, and could be a leader in so many more ways.  Schwarzenegger has been impeding California’s leadership in the global community.  It is not the time to abdicate our leadership or throw our hands in the air and just give up.

Wilkes in the news

Brent Wilkes, the Duke Cunningham bribing, prostitute poker providing defense contractor, is all over the news lately.  He appears in the latest issue of Newsweek.  Good job Brent!

There is nothing unusual or illegal about a defense contractor with an open checkbook for campaign fund-raisers and seats to fill on a corporate jet. But federal prosecutors want to find out more about how Wilkes tapped into what may be one of Washington’s sweetest post-9/11 honey pots—secret defense and intelligence contracts that are often awarded without competitive bids or oversight but with plenty of congressional meddling. Wilkes appears to be at the center of a Washington scandal that has the potential to shake Capitol Hill and the Pentagon.
***
According to published reports and congressional and law-enforcement sources who did not want to be identified discussing a sensitive investigation, the Feds are also reviewing Wilkes’s ties to other powerful House leaders. Former GOP majority leader Tom DeLay, Armed Services Committee chairman Duncan Hunter and Appropriations Committee chairman Jerry Lewis all reportedly had dealings with Wilkes. None has been accused of any wrongdoing; a spokesman for Lewis said the congressman had not seen Wilkes for 10 years. Hunter’s spokesman said his boss urged the Pentagon to ignore congressional pressure on contracting, and DeLay’s lawyer had no immediate comment. (Newsweek 6/5/06)

And nobody wants to play with poor Brent Wilkes anymore.  Nobody goes to his poker prostitute parties, nobody gets him $10million contracts.  And nobody even wants to admit knowing the poor guy:

His life is getting lonelier. He has been dropped by charities; his office building is for sale; his federal contracts are drying up. Once a ubiquitous figure in San Diego politics, Wilkes might as well have ceased to exist. Former San Diego congressman Brian Bilbray, a Republican who was in the House until 2001 before retiring to become a lobbyist, is running for Duke Cunningham’s vacated seat. Bilbray told NEWSWEEK, “I may have met Brent once or twice, but I really do not remember.” Bilbray did discover that Wilkes had donated $7,000 to his campaigns, but the candidate has given the money to charity. “I wouldn’t know Wilkes if I saw him in the street,” said Bilbray.

Even his fellow lobbyists, like Brian Bilbray, are throwing the guy under the bus.  What indignation the man has suffered.  All this for trying to pursue the American dream.  And what’s the problem anyway?  Everybody loves poker these days.  And prostitution is the oldest profession.  It’s got a long, cherished history.  Poor, poor Brent.  I think it’s jealousy.

CA-4: Doolittle better be in on the action to get the deals done

(Updated for SacBee editorial – promoted by SFBrianCL)

UPDATE 6/4/06: The SacBee published an editorial today demanding to know the real reason for Doolittle’s involvement in the Homewood deal.  Here’s the money quote:
 

One can only hope Doolittle isn’t doing the work of Tahoe developers who want to buy Homewood. Possibly he is just sending a warning shot to Yurosek and his business partners. Based on a report by The Bee’s David Whitney, Yurosek didn’t fully involve Doolittle in negotiating key details of the transaction. His team was also slow to contribute money to the congressman’s re-election campaign.

See the flip for the full story…

From SacBee (via DumpDoolittle Blog)

The Homewood Mountain Resort’s ski area occupies the largest piece of developable property remaining in the Lake Tahoe basin. With elevations reaching 1,600 feet above the lake’s famed blue waters, the views from its slopes are spectacular. The property includes two lakes and crosses three watersheds.  And it’s for sale.

If owner Jeff Yurosek has his way, 1,086 acres will be sold to the U.S. Forest Service under a deal that will keep the struggling ski business open. The estimated $60 million to $65 million the property is likely to fetch will be used to build an expanded commercial center on land along Highway 89 that will remain privately held.  That plan was moving forward largely in secret until Rep. John Doolittle, R-Roseville, brought it to an abrupt halt this month.

Doolittle’s intervention is raising worries that instead of remaining open to public use, the property is edging closer to being carved into as many as 23 estate-sized lots for the superwealthy, and in the process opening new channels for pollution to reach the world-famous lake whose renowned clarity is a constant challenge.(SacBee 5/29/06)

You see, Doolittle doesn’t really much care about Lake Tahoe so much as he cares about seeing to it that our government is completely useless.  Well not entirely useless, because he still wants to be able to run for something and rake in his 15% cut of campaign donations.  And more importantly, ol’ 15% wants to make sure that nobody considers doing any deals in the Tahoe region without giving him credit.  The man needs to get some action for himself before he will allow anything, even anything beneficial, to happen.

Art Chapman, JMA Ventures president, said Yurosek had been contacted by Placer County Supervisor Bruce Kranz and told that a contribution to the congressman would be “appropriate.” But Chapman said he didn’t learn of the congressman’s opposition to the project until the morning of the fundraiser, which was several days after he and Yurosek had written their checks.

Doesn’t that just sicken you?  To me, those comments are beyond the pale and really head towards criminality.  But, you know, good luck on getting anything investigated in this Congress.  The only sure way that we are getting rid of ol’ 15% is a loss in November.

CA-50: Unhappy times in NRCC

From U.S. News (via [RandyMI at dKos ]http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/5/29/162037/594]):

Staffers from the National Republican Congressional Committee are quietly telling GOP House members to prepare for a possible loss in the June 6 special election to fill the seat of Randy “Duke” Cunningham, now in prison for taking bribes. The Southern California district is heavily Republican, but some GOP insiders believe that Democrat Francine Busby will defeat former GOP Rep. Brian Bilbray and go on to win a full term in November. More alarming some worry that a Bilbray defeat could signal the GOP’s loss of control of the House. The NRCC has already pumped $3.1 million into the race. “It is becoming more and more likely,” says one GOP strategist, “that Bilbray will squeak out a victory.” But another longtime Republican operative isn’t so sure. “This is a district we should never lose,” he says. “It’s the stink of Cunningham, and the Bush problem.”(Usnews.com 6/5/2006 (sic))

As we’ve talked about here recently, Francine Busby has a slight cash lead.  However the NRCC is desparate to keep this seat in GOP hands.  Lobbyist Brian Bilbray is the benificiary of that program.  We need to make sure that Francine can respond to the NRCC attack ads and dishonesty that they are spewing.

This race is not only winnable, it’s a race that, at this point, is our ours to lose.  Complaceny is now our biggest enemy.  The NRCC will go to great lengths to ensure that the lobbyist wins this seat (and furthering the K Street Project).  Check out our ActBlue page to donate to Francine’s campaign.

CA-42 – We have a write in candidate! SPREAD THE WORD QUICKLY!

(We’ve got a candidate in CA-42. Let’s see if he can qualify for the general. – promoted by SFBrianCL)

***** Cross posted at Daily Kos, MyDD, Our Congress (hopefully LOL), Calitics and My Left Wing!*****

Like many in the progressive blogosphere I was disgruntled (shitty actually) that write in filing had closed in California and we didn’t have a starter in CA-42. I even diaried about it.

So imagine my shock when I scrolled through the Kos diaries and found this unloved and unlamented bombshell. Yep we have a starter and his name is Mark Hull-Richter!!!!

Being a bit skeptical about these things I wandered over to the Californian Secretary of State site to have a gander at the list of Certified Write In candidates and yep Mark is listed.

Below for more………..

Like most of you I know nothing about Mark but so what he is running to get enough write in votes in the primary on June 6th to get on the ballot in November.

His is a steeper challenge than either Tony Barr, Charles Dertinger or Charlie Wilson, but if they could do it so too can Mark Hull-Richter!

Yes he is leaving his run mighty late and yes it is a cheap and nasty campaign website and yes that is one hell of a name to write in and yes he needs 2461 write in votes to get on the ballot in November!!!!

Mark however has three things going in his favour.
1) He is running
2) The progressive blogosphere knows he is running and can get behind him (no not financially).
3) Most importantly he has filed to receive write in votes under a wide variety of spellings of his name go check the Certified Write In list and you will see what I mean.

So come on you lot ring write and email friends and family in CA-42 or better still email Mark and offer an hour or two to ring registered Dems in the district to remind them to vote on Tuesday 6th June and to write in Mark-Hull Richter for the 42nd.

This is the 50 State Strategy in action guys GO TO IT!

Brought to you by the gang from the 50 State Page and of course Barry Welsh. Don’t forget the Welsh campaign meet up in Indianapolis on June 24th.

424 Races filled with a target of 431!

“Republicans are running scared”

Check out this editorial from the North County Times about Dick Cheney’s visit to California 50 District the upcoming June 6th special election. Visit www.californiawomenvote.org and www.myspace.com/cawomenvote for more information.

When Dick Cheney came to town

By: JOHN VAN DOORN – Staff Writer

Imagine that: Vice President Dick Cheney came to town to (1) endorse Brian Bilbray, and (2) to say that the eyes of the nation were on the 50th Congressional District, which is where Bilbray is running.

This was news. Voters in the 50th, much of which lies in North County, cannot be expected to check the eyes of the nation, not without years of ophthalmological instruction. If the vice president can, and did, more power to him. All those eyes. We’d best stand up straight and try not to stammer.
Cheney was an especially big gun to visit San Diego for the purpose of endorsement, even if the significance of the race in the national scheme of things had been obvious for months. Cheney’s timeline was a trifle askew: More eyes of the nation will be focused on the 50th during and after a vice president’s visit than before.

More to the point: Republicans are running scared, even if very few will say it out loud. So Cheney’s visit was no surprise.

The fall of the house of Cunningham is a very serious part of the fear. While in Congress as the representative for the 50th district, Randy Cunningham took bribes in cash, cars, houses, yachts and antiques to do what he could for defense contractors.

And went to jail, said to be the worst offender in the history of Congress, noted for offenders of every stripe.

There is fear elsewhere among Republicans because corruption on their side of the aisle in Washington has tainted others and engulfed a few, such as Tom DeLay. Almost certainly there are more storms to come —- all sides agree on that, the Democrats gleefully —- and this creates a certain edginess among politicians and their handlers.

(To be fair, or at least balanced, the Democrats have a few bad apples, too, but the scale seems less imposing. The Republicans for the moment have the market cornered.)

You throw in a deceitful war, the bumbles of Katrina, the grotesqueries of immigration policy, and the fatness of Fat Oil and you’d run scared, too.

Mind you, Bilbray is no prize. As a congressman once before, and as a lobbyist after that, he had certain connections in Washington and involvements with oil companies that appear, at least to his critics, unsavory.

Thus, Cheney came to town. Once an oil man himself, he spoke to the faithful about the campaign in the 50th District, and said the nation needs Brian Bilbray. Cheney also spoke to military groups and raced about the region doing what he could for George and country.

The 50th race has been ugly, at least in terms of television advertising. The assaults by the Republican machine in Washington on the Democratic aspirant, Francine Busby, have ranged in tone from vicious to scurrilous, with several stops in between.

Busby’s people have gone negative, as well, but they say they’re only defending their candidate.

Primary choices: I’ve voted

Cross posted at Happening-Here

Well, I’ve voted in California’s June primary. That’s not really surprising: since I am ordinarily trying to get out somebody’s vote, I always vote absentee. The last thing I usually have time to do on Election Day is vote. This time I really will be absent, out of the country.

So yesterday I pulled out the two huge paper ballots and did the deed. Here are some of my votes, local first, some with an explanation.

Local San Francisco candidates and ballot measures
Democratic Central Committee: these contests always feel like voting for high school student council. Serious aspirants spend a fair amount of money on signs, even occasionally mail. The outcome does matter, at least a little; I’d much prefer to have a DCC that pushes Nancy Pelosi to the left than just have party hacks. But I know half the candidates and many aren’t my favorite people. I’m not going to tell the blog who I voted for; suffice to say, I vote for people I like and don’t worry too much about it.

Prop. D, Laguna Honda Hospital Zoning Changes: this seems to be the one local measure that is getting money spent on it. I’ve had slick mailers from both sides. Proponents claim it will prevent the strapped Department of Public Health from dumping dangerous crazy people into the city-run old age home. Opponents claim it is a cover for zoning changes that would allow nursing home development on properties all over the city. Hard to tell, but using the ballot to change zoning seems an ass-backwards way of protecting senior citizens. I said NO.

Federal Races
I had the opportunity to vote in the primary for Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein whose opponents I had never heard of. I didn’t. Nancy sometimes does pretty well as leader of the House minority, but she is way to the right of her constituents. Diane was a micro-managing, dictatorial mayor and as a Senator is way too accommodating to Bush. Her sympathy with immigration restriction is noxious. Forget ’em; they don’t represent me and don’t need me.

Miscellaneous State Races
My Assemblyman, Mark Leno, has done a way better job in Sacramento than I hoped for. This sometimes happens when we send what we see here as a centrist to the state capitol; they become the effective left of the Democrats. He is unopposed.

Prop. 82: Mandatory Pre-School: I voted for it, but I am not entirely happy about it. Because we’ve made raising enough in taxes to pay the state’s bills almost impossible, we keep using Mickey Mouse funding mechanisms to attain good ends. We are soaking the very wealthy for this one and that is fine with me — but someday we have to fix the real problem, to allow the government to plan, budget and tax rationally.

State Constitutional Offices
Attorney General: I have argued often that who fills this office is one of the most important choices Californians make. That person gets to define what the ballot title will be on all these initiatives we constantly vote on (instead of having a functioning government). So I wished very much I had an appealing Democratic choice to vote for. But I didn’t. I went with Jerry Brown, knowing that I’ll probably regret electing him someday. Jerry was a strange, wishy-washy governor, making some great appointments but swaying with breeze on the crucial tax limitation measures that began to plague us during his term in office. He might have made a fun Senator — I wanted to see him as Senator Moonbeam and was sorry he was beaten for the office in 1982. His rebirth as Mayor of Oakland since 1998 has not been a triumph of progressivism — the guy’s idea of brave innovation was to launch a military academy for the city’s failing public schools.

Unfortunately, Brown’s opponent, LA prsecutor Rocky Delgadillo, is running as a law enforcement hawk who doesn’t worry about civil liberties. This is not the year for that attitude. I took Brown, holding my nose.

Secretary of State: this one was easy. Deborah Bowen cares about making sure that California voting machines create an auditable paper trail. Computer voting systems could be a great innovation, but anyone who has actually seen how local departments of elections muddle through can’t be comfortable unless very strong controls and auditing provisions are in force. Bowen understands that.

Lieutenant Governor: I voted for Jackie Speier. She has made a real effort to win consumer privacy protections for financial information through state law (rules now endangered by national Congressional Republicans).

Governor: I would dearly love to defeat Gov. Arnold in the fall — after all, I spent most of last year working to give him trouble. But I don’t believe either Steve Westly or Phil Angelides has what it will take to overcome his star power. They just aren’t very interesting. Unfortunately, in the top ranks of California’s rather comfortable Democratic party, we don’t do charisma. The unlamented Gray Davis won office twice by being the lesser evil. He demonstrated the weakness of this approach by falling in the recall; lesser evils don’t create any friends who fight for them in tough times. Angelides and Westly also just don’t light up a room with any kind of vision.

Since I don’t think either of these guys is more electable than the other, my vote for a gubernatorial candidate became a free vote: I could simply pick the one who came closer to me ideologically. That wasn’t hard. Angelides got the nod because, with baby steps, he is willing to approach the need to raise someone’s taxes, if only the richest Californians. Our refusal to tax is undermining the ability of California government of govern. The guy who edges toward reality on taxes gets my vote.

Behold the wrath of Nunez

This is almost Willie-esque of Fabian.  When Juan Arambula fails to vote for the bonds package and toe the party line, Fabian takes away his committee chair and moves him out of his cushy office to a small one in the dark recesses of the capitol.

A truce was called in the Assembly on Friday as Speaker Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles, said he was reinstating Arambula, D-Fresno, as chairman of the Committee on Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy.
***
Arambula abstained on all four bond votes in frustration that money for water storage wasn’t included in the $37 billion package, which was approved despite Arambula’s holdout. Voters will take up the bonds in November. Núñez was so angered by the move that he tossed Arambula out of his four-room office, forcing him and his staff into the smallest of Capitol digs.(SacBee 5/27/06)

Now, that’s discipline!  Let’s see Rahm or Nancy try to do that to the House Dems.  Forget Willie, that’s almost worthy of Delay-esque.  I guess everybody know’s who’s the boss in the Assembly.