California Blog Roundup for August 7, 2006

Today’s California Blog Roundup is on the flip. Teasers: Phil Angelides, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry McNerney, Charlie Brown, John Doolittle, Brent Wilkes, Republican corruption, Proposition 89, minimum wage, prisons, environment, redistricting reform.

Governor’s Race

Jerry McNerney / Paid-For Pombo / CA-11

    Randy Bayne attended the opening of Jerry McNerney’s Stockton office and reports back.

Charlie Brown / 15% Doolittle / CA-04

Other Republican Paragons (Brent Wilkes Edition)

  • California Republican taught Brent Wilkes how to bribe. Awwww… isn’t that sweet?
  • Ah, the top tier of Wilkes “transactional lobbying” recipients (purty euphemism for “bribery”, ain’t it — lots of California Republicans. Makes one proud.
  • Down With Tyranny: You simply can’t walk away from the [article] without wondering why Randy “Duke” Cunningham is the only Republican in prison for the widespread corruption that virtually defines the GOP political culture of the last half dozen years in Washington, from lowlife slimeball congressmen to a lowlife slimeball president and vice president (yes, Wilkes gave BushCheney hundreds of thousands of dollars in quasi-legal bribes too).
  • Apparently, corruption is what you get when you put Republicans in positions of power. Of course, since they don’t believe in government, they probably don’t think they did anything wrong.

Propositions

Prisons

  • Politics in the Zeros: Take control of the prisons away from the Schwarzeneggers and prison guards, and force reform.
  • Don Perata: what we’re doing with the prisons isn’t working. Time to try some actual rehabilitation.
  • Schwarzenegger’s last-minute election year stunt, calling a special session to deal with the prison crisis he’s known about for years, is pretty much guaranteed to fail. No matter what the Bush Republicans say, you don’t just whip up a solution to problems of this size, just in time for an election.

The Rest

Schwarzenegger backing new redistricting push

From the SF Gate Politics blog (the website of the San Francisco Chronicle).

Schwarzenegger has long been a champion of changing the way voting districts are created — the idea was one of four proposals he unsuccessfully pitched to voters in last year’s doomed special election. But the governor has now pledged to try and fast-track redistricting reform, which will be officially announced at a Tuesday press conference in Sacramento by supporters of the idea.

It looks like Arnold is up to his old tricks again with redistricting. And why not? It’s the Tom Delay rulebook if you can’t win outright, change the rules.

This is a touchy subject as California’s legislative districts are basically incumbent protection rackets for both parties, but if you ask me the ballot prop that was voted down last year was a bad deal. You don’t universally disarm when you are in the middle of a dogfight and especially not with a group of retired judges picked by Arnold.

more on this beneath the fold:
Schwarzenegger backing new redistricting push

Schwarzenegger met Thursday with a bipartisan group of supporters, including former Senate Republican Leader Jim Brulte, former Democratic Assemblyman Fred Keeley and the president of the League of Women Voters. The group is expecting legislation by state Sen. Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, will be at the center of the debate next week, although there are still some internal debates going on over the specifics of the bill. The basic difference between the current proposal and the one Schwarzenegger supported last year is who will determine districts — the governor’s idea was to allow retired judges to do it; that has been thrown out in favor of a citizen’s commission.

A citizen’s commission is something, and I think fair redistricting would be a good thing. However the legislature would be very foolish to hand Arnold another flower for his bipartisan election year bouquet.

The deadline is creeping up quickly. And Perata is not behind this, so my guess is that it won’t be going anywhere.

Oh wait!
But Arnold is a moderate right? At least that’s what Spielberg, Katzenberg and Saban would have you believe.

Oh, he’s such a reformer!!
please.

-C.

Blogosphere: We need Kos like we need a hole in the head.

Ever since the primary, Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, aka Kos, has been talking down the chances of one Phil Angelides for Governor. He was pro Westly during the primary and now he seems to be happy to talk down Angelides’ chances at every turn.

We don’t need your pessimism, Kos.

More after the flip.

This is my official resignation from Daily Kos, a move which I have been pondering for months. I post as “MamasGun” on Daily Kos.

For the past couple of months, I have been cut off from my Trusted User status on Daily Kos, just in time for a big wave of troll diaries and pie fighting over the Lamont/Lieberman primary. I thought this was an accident of the new website interface, which is a ponderous monstrosity that uses tons and tons of AJAX. When Google does AJAX, they do it with grace and in a way that doesn’t weigh down FireFox. However, when Kos does AJAX, it becomes a crashy thing that crashes FireFox quite often.

However, I am not so sure now that it was an accident that left me without my “Mojo.” Since I have yet to get my “Mojo” back after two months of losing it, never mind that I have had many double-digit rated posts in the past two months, I am beginning to suspect that I had my Trusted User status taken away from me by Kos himself because I had the guts to call him on first his support for Westly in the primary and then his consistent anti-Angelides tone since the primary.

What does he want to do? Does he want Arnold for four more lousy years? What is his freakin’ problem?

If Kos put as much energy into cheerleading for Angelides as he does for cheerleading for Ned Lamont, Angelides would have all the “big mo” he could use. Instead, he brays, Eeyore-stylee, that Angelides doesn’t have a chance against the steamroller that is Herr Ah-nuld der Gropenfuhrer.

Thing is, last time I checked, Kos is a Californian, not a Connecticut-person. What are residents of Connecticut called? Connecticut Yankees? See, I’m Californian, second generation Californian even, I don’t know. Anyway, Kos is from California. The Angelides/Schwarzenegger race is in his own freaking back yard.

I don’t want Ah-nuld’s signature on my Masters of Social Work when I get my Masters in hopefully 3 years. I am freaking tired of his face and his attitude. I want that bastard OUT OF OFFICE. I would really like to see him drummed out of the state and sent back to Austria where he belongs with his goose-stepping Nazi-nostalgic buddies like former UN Secretary/Austrian Chancellor Kurt Waldheim.

If Angelides loses, and Ah-nuld gets 4 more years to play Fuhrer here, the best goddamn role the hack’s ever gotten, then there will be more than enough blame to go around. I am not saying that Kos will be even an important person to blame for the failure: the way the campaign is going Angelides will have more than enough people on his staff to blame. But as the old ’60s saying goes, you are either part of the SOLUTION or part of the PROBLEM. And Kos is part of the PROBLEM right now.

Prop 85: Labor Officially Opposes Prop 73 Redux

The California Labor Federation, which had been neutral on Prop 73 during the special election, is officially now opposing the redux.

California’s leading union organization, bucking organized labor’s long-standing neutrality on the issue of abortion, is for the first time taking a strong stand in favor of abortion rights.

Meeting behind closed doors last month, the California Labor Federation — which represents more than 2.1 million workers belonging to more than 1,100 affiliated unions — voted to oppose Proposition 85, a November ballot initiative that would require doctors to notify parents before performing abortions on minors. In a policy statement, the labor federation also urged the national AFL-CIO “to reconsider its position of neutrality on the issue.”
(LA Times 8/7/06)

It’s great to hear that the CLF is standing up for the safety of teenagers.  The transperancy of the motives of the far Right combined with their tenacity on this issue mean that we will need to focus a lot of energy on the issue.