CA-Gov Field: Whoa there, don’t go calling this one yet.

The new Field Poll(PDF) has been released, and it shows a much more reasonable lead for Arnold: 10 points. As I have frequently said, the Field Poll is the best poll on California elections. Another interesting number also comes from this poll: 67% of voters think that Arnold will win the election.  It looks like the media has done their job on this one convincing the world that it’s over before it ever started.  Well folks, it ain’t over.

A few encouraging points:

  • Arnold is still languishing well below fifty percent, currently at 44 percent, while Angelides has 34%.  Arnold has all the media coverage he could ever want, and he still can’t get fifty percent.  That’s not a good sign for the “greatest superstar governor EVER!”
  • This poll was done BEFORE the unions upped their antes against Arnold.  I think the nurses “hounding Arnold” project and the new ABC ads will have a real impact on the race as people begin to remember the special election.  If more people go to the voting booth thinking about November 2005, Phil has a shot.
  • Arnold’s lead has been pretty much stagnant since Arnold originally grabbed his seven point lead in the spring.  While everybody has been burying Phil, Arnold has made little actual headway.

I’ll get some more interesting numbers over the flip.

The Cash Dash

According to the LA Time’s new feature “Mothers Milk” (http://www.latimes.c…)$349,944,580 has been raised to date for the 2006 CA state elections and initiatives.

On Tuesday $1,781,285 was raised.

While these numbers are staggering they point to a systemic problem. Politicians and the interests in Sacramento have an agenda. It is not the agenda they talk about in their television ads or direct mail pieces. It has nothing to do with education funding or taxes for the rich. It has to do with obscure regulations, rules, and laws which few have hardly ever heard of. It involves tax write offs and loop holes that corporations, HMO’s, doctors, lawyers and developers can use to leverage their advantages.

Yet even with all of the corruption, backslapping and political payoffs occuring in Sacramento (see the terrific ads from the Alliance for a Better California)the public and especially “influentials” have been reluctant to introduce campaign finance reform with teeth.

We finally have the chance with Prop 89.

While the measure is complex it would increase taxes on corporations to raise roughly $200 million for the public funding of campaigns. In addition it would decrease donations to legislative campaigns from $3,300 to $500 and for statewide races from $22,300 to $1,000.

Most importantly though, Prop 89 looks to limit the spending on the direct arm of big business, the initiative. Every cycle we see oil, pharmaceutical and health care companies poor millions and millions of dollars on initiatives they say are meant to solve this problem, or help another yet are really narrowly designed to help themselves. In fact it would limit direct donations to $10,000 per initiative.

While the legal standing of this is still unsettled it is something we should leave to their lawyers and the courts and not let it effect our thinking in the voting booth.

Real campaign finance reform is needed, and unless drastic steps are taken no change will ever occur.


(CA-45) Roth-A-Palooza Returns! as Bono ducks and dissembles

First things first:  “Roth-A-Palooza” Rock Concert in support of David Roth’s run for Congress

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingThis Saturday, September 30, 2006

9:00 PM

Rock Garden Cafe

777 S. Palm Canyon, Palm Springs, CA 92264

Local bands for Roth:

Sound Asleep

MECHE

Save Us Now

The Movie Colony

The Feedbacks

Bernice & Alex

$5 cover   Let’s hear it for Juan Carlos Sanchez, rocking field organizer, pictured (left) with our own kickass David Roth.  You can’t fool the youth.  Which brings me to Bono.

Once a young widow filling Sonny Bono’s seat, Mary Bono has grown up to be a reliable Rubberstamp Republican and Bush toady.  Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting  Bono voted for torture.  Bono thinks we’re making “inroads” in the Middle East.  (Does she ever see the news?)  Bono cast the deciding vote to cut $14 billion from federal student aid.  Today (UPDATE: actually, on 9/23, to pre-empt Roth’s scheduled talk on schools) she had the AUDACITY to tout the endorsement of a measly fifteen “educators” (actually, school board members, trustees, and administrators), and lay this eloquence on us:

“I have worked hard in Congress to pass legislation that will hold public schools more accountable for the education provided to our children and to ensure that everyone has access to the best education,” said Congresswoman Bono.

“I want to return control of our schools to the parents and get them more involved in the teaching process. This is essential for restoring our commitment to basic academics and to making sure that every child is given the same opportunity to thrive and succeed” said Congresswoman Bono.

Yes, you heard her, she just bragged about her part in pushing the infamous “No Child Left Behind” farce on our innocent children and their beleaguered teachers.  That was her defense against Roth’s stinging indictment yesterday of Bush and Bono’s big idea for our schools:

No Child’s over-emphasis on test results has “made our schools into accountability factories,” Roth said.

The federal law creates billions in unfunded mandates for schools each year, Roth said, and doesn’t take into account the diversity of students and their different learning styles.

Vouchers and privatization of education aren’t the answer, Roth said.

“If we would put as much energy into supporting our public schools as we do into creating alternatives to them in the private sector, we would be in an entirely different place,” he said.

Roth is a commissioner on the California Student Aid Commission, and served as a deputy to the president of Occidental College.

He was also involved in forming the Pathways to College Network, a national program to increase the number of minorities and other underrepresented groups of young people graduate from high school and move on to institutions of higher learning.

One of Roth’s key staffers, Arnie Kaminsky, is a retired teacher, he has credibility on education.  David Roth, California Student Aid Commissioner (and youngest ever President of said Commission), internationally recognized expert on education reform, David has credibility on education.  All Mary Bono knows about public education is that USC tuition sure puts a cramp on even a rich parent’s style.  

How long, Lord?  How long must we listen to “public servants” like this, when the country is aching for serious leadership?  Bono has $500,000 more than Roth in campaign funds.  Show her it will never be enough.   Help us get David Roth to Washington, and let’s Take Back the House!  Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Crossposted at Daily Kos

ABC’s ads: Really, Really Good

(Also see the Alliance’s post – promoted by SFBrianCL)

UPDATE: Arnold’s Campaign has launched a fact check on these ads.  Here’s my breakdown of their “fact-check”:

  1. They argue that Arnold didn’t cut educational funding by saying that funding went up every year.  True enough, but Arnold did steal money to which the schools were entitled under Prop 98.  That is the real fact that they don’t mention.
  2. They then argue that that ABC misstated the cost of the special.  They have a reasonable point, but a relatively minor one.  They don’t even dispute the fact that they wasted money, instead they quibble about the amount: “ABC Misstates Cost Of Special Election And Governor Schwarzenegger Plans To Sign Bill Reimbursing Counties $39 Million For Special Election.” And the fact that Arnold is signing a bill to reimburse the counties just moves the money cost from the counties to the state.  Does Arnold plan on personally reimbursing the state for that $39/70 million dollars, or however much it was? Signing a bill having the state pay isn’t a solution for the cost.
  3. On “In his own words” they build a straw man to tear down. Damn you Straw man, why did you say that Arnold wouldn’t raise campaign funds. Oh, I assumed that was you, because ABC certainly never said that.  But that’s what Arnold is trying to tear down.  The point that ABC is making in that ad is that Arnold came to town saying that he doesn’t need special interest money, but then he took $100 million.  He’s no reformer, and no better than any other politician.
  4. Their response to the fact that Arnold has taken more special interest money than any other California politician in history?  Well, none, they just say, “yeah, well Phil took some money too, kinda, well, just not as much as Arnold.  Phil is jealous of our cash!” Umm, well, Phil has to take money to keep up with the Governator’s massive cash machine.  And Phil also never went to the Railroad Museum to say how he was going to kick special interest butt.  He went there to support Prop 89 to really reform the way the state plays politics.

I present these ads from the Alliance for a Better California.  In my opinion, they are the best Dem-leaning ads of the cycle.  They make their point.  The first ad says that he’s against working people and that we can’t trust him.

I’ve moved the ads over the flip.

“In His Own Words”

“In the Eye

This second ad talks about his raid on education funding and the special.

CA-Gov Alliance is Back: Our Ads

(x-posted on dailykos)

I have been promising you all for a while that we would be back and active this year.  Here is what you have been waiting for, a new round of ads.  Below is the press release and several formats of the ads including YouTube.

These ads focus on Arnold’s broken promises and question his trustworthiness.

This ad is titled “In His Words”

Quicktime
Windows Media Player

Here is “In the Eye”

Quicktime
Windows Media Player

And part of the press release:

Sacramento – The Alliance for a Better California, the coalition that led the effort to defeat Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Special Election Agenda last year, today released two new television ads focusing on Schwarzenegger’s broken promises and questioning his trustworthiness. The ads’ release coincides with the second year anniversary of the women’s conference where the Governor attacked union members, declaring “I’m always kicking their butts.”

The 30-second commercials featuring teachers, firefighters, nurses, and police officers (available online at www.betterca.com) begin airing today in television markets statewide. The ads cite Schwarzenegger’s broken promises on funding public education and other issues, and question the Governor’s integrity based on his policy reversals, including his promise to be different.

“The Alliance is continuing its efforts to protect working men and women because we don’t know what Arnold Schwarzenegger really believes,” said Gale Kaufman, consultant to the Alliance for a Better California. “There is no evidence of what his core values are. Time and time again we’ve seen him try to reinvent himself in an effort to gain advantage in the polls and to fool voters into thinking he’s not just another politician.”

“These ads remind voters of some very basic things – this Governor will say whatever it takes to get re-elected and that for this Governor talk is cheap. He has no record of holding up his end of the bargain. How can voters trust that next year, should he be re-elected, they would have any idea what his policies will be?” Kaufman said.

Glendale teacher Sandra Fink, who appears in the ad, says, “Governor Schwarzenegger is again promising to make education his top priority because it’s election time and he knows that’s what voters want to hear. But how can we trust him? What happens if the governor who broke his promises to our students and schools – the governor teachers had to sue just to get back the billions he borrowed from education – shows up again next year? We can’t trust this governor. He hasn’t earned it.”

“Integrity is something California’s firefighters don’t take lightly, and we have been profoundly disappointed in Governor Schwarzenegger,” said Brian Rice, a Sacramento firefighter also featured in the ad. “He wasted all of last year on a divisive Special Election on issues that attacked working people. He lost our trust. How can we trust him to not go back to being the Governor who attacked working men and women?”

Why is the Alliance continuing their efforts to protect working men and women? Because we don’t know who Arnold Schwarzenegger really is and we have no way of knowing what he really believes. Time and time again we’ve seen him try to reinvent himself to be able to gain advantage in polling numbers, fool the voters into thinking he’s not just another politician, and spend taxpayers’ money on wasteful big stunts.”

We’re currently on Arnold #4, by my calculations. So, the Alliance asks, which Governor would show up after re-election, after the votes are counted? Why would we want to wait to find out?” Kaufman concluded.

CA-Gov PPIC: Arnold’s lead increases

PPIC has Arnold’s lead swelling to 17 (48-31) from 13 (45-32).  Only word I’ve seen on this is from Dan Weintraub:

Among likely voters, Schwarzenegger is up by 48-31.

Angelides is leading among Democrats by 57-21.

Schwarzenegger is up among Republicans, 82-4.

Among independents, it’s Schwarzenegger by 42-27.

Among men: 54-27.

Among women: 41-24.

I’m still a little uncomfortable with PPIC’s likely voter model, but if the lead grows much larger it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.  People won’t vote if they don’t think it’s a close race.  However, we need to make sure we bring a huge GOTV effort.  Down-ticket races will be depending on the fact that we get decent Dem participation.  And who knows, with a big turnout, perhaps all those “likely voter” models will be proven wrong.  More information on this when I get it…

CNA back to Dogging Arnold

The California Nurses Association has been fighting Arnold Schwarzenegger for as long as anybody else.  And they haven’t quit just because he’s changed his colors (to green!) for the election.

Yesterday, CNA members protested in San Francisco, at a $1,000 per plate fundraiser at the Fairmount Hotel, and in Los Angeles at the State’s Women’s Conference.  Apparently, he blessed the event with ten of his very precious moments.  From BeyondChron:

Approximately 30 activists from the California Nurses Association gathered in front of the Fairmont Hotel yesterday to protest a $25,000-a-plate fundraiser that Arnold Schwarzenegger was holding inside for his re-election campaign. Waving signs in support of Proposition 89 (the Clean Money Initiative that will provide public financing for California campaigns), the protesters vowed to challenge Arnold every step of the way as he shatters all campaign fundraising records. Over the next two weeks, the Nurses will target Schwarzenegger at ten sites throughout California (most in the Los Angeles area) as part of their “Hounding Arnold” tour.
{snip}
The Nurses hope to bring Arnold’s Extreme Make-Over to a grinding halt. “The month of October is the chance for [Schwarzenegger’s Democratic opponent] Phil Angelides to change the narrative, and he can do it,” said Shum Preston of the Nurses’ Association. “While Arnold has made some feints towards the center, it hasn’t altered his fundamental character – which is an insatiable fundraiser. Our goal is to create a tsunami of public opinion against Schwarzenegger.”

Arguably, these “hounding Arnold” could be more successful in driving votes from Arnold to Phil than the Alliance ad campaign or CDP’s ads.  dday’s GovernorPhil post expounds on the importance of these events:

But in my view, the ads are not what brought down Schwarzenegger in the special election last year. It was the tenacity of the various union organizations, who were at every public event, in Arnold’s face at every moment, not allowing him a moment in the limelight without them right there with him. They started in January and they didn’t give up. Arnold cracked under the pressure and said “the special interests don’t like me because I kick their butts,” picking a fight with the regular people who help Californians every day, police, firefighters, nurses, teachers. This was the key to victory last year.

I’ll try to cover as many of these events as possible in the upcoming six weeks.

LA Land Grab

(The founders of this site are vehemently against prop. 90, and have asked that if I post on this subject to directly address the issues they made in the past or how it directly relates to CA. I will not be able to rebut every point as I am not a lawyer, but I feel this demonstrates nicely the point I was attempting to make in the past. In the days to come I will try to express my take on some of the other concerns they have)

The most vocal opponents of Prop. 90 have argued that while eminent domain reform is needed the initiative either goes too far or is poorly worded, depending on the take you get.

The problem with this argument is they try to accuse it of being a secret plot by developers to loosen enviornmental restrictions and the like. The initiatve can not be both clever and poorly worded.

So why is the language regarding changes in value in the initiative at all? Well there is an example in LA that demonstrates it perfectly. The city has offered a price for 11 homes and 14 businesses they are looking to buy so they may turn the land over to developers.

The only problem, the homeowners and businesses do not want to move. They have done their part, paid their taxes and been good neighbors, yet the city is telling them that doesn’t matter and they must go!

So what is the city doing to force their hands? They are threatening to condemn the buildings, making them virtually worthless and forcing the occupants to move.

Included below is a full description of this scenario:

In July 2001, the Garden Grove City Council approved two new hotel projects along Harbor Boulevard, with at least $4.2 million in public financial assistance, for McWhinney/Stonebridge Corp., a Colorado-based development group that previously received tens of millions of dollars in assistance for building other hotels in Garden Grove. For one of these new hotel developments, the City has threatened to condemn 11 homes and 14 businesses unless the targeted owners agree to sell at the City’s prices. The City has already bought three other homes standing in the way of the hotel, and now is using heavy-handed tactics to force the other owners out. Assistant City Manager Matt Fertal takes an especially dim view of the right of property owners along Harbor to use the free market to determine what price developers should pay to take their land from them. According to Fertal, “[Owners] think that just because they’re on Harbor and hotels are coming, that it increases the value of their property, but it doesn’t. Commercial [developers] only care about the cost of the dirt on the land. We’re offering to pay for the structure at the appraised value and the land.”1In other words, the rightful owners don’t deserve to profit from their investment; instead, any profit will go to the City’s favored corporate developers. And for the people who actually want to keep their homes or businesses, at least one city leader couldn’t care less. (via http://www.CastleCoa…)

So the next time someone tells you that people should not be compensated for regulatory changes, you tell them about this story.

The New CDP ad comparing Bush and Arnold

The new CDP ads should be running.  I thought it was a lot better than the previous “Arnold Schwarzenegger is for George W. Bush, is he for you?” ad.  This one actually brings up some of the problems with Arnold Schwarzenegger, rather than just the fact that he’s a Bushite. It first draws parallels from privatization of Social Security with Arnold’s attacks on state pensions. It then moves on to NCLB and Arnold’s stealing money from schools, and concludes with a comparison of raising student loan fee hikes by W and tuition hikes by Arnold.  All in all, a pretty effective ad.

I uploaded it to YouTube as well and it should be up and running in a few minutes:

Unions to start anti-Arnold ad blitz tomorrow

The union cooperative organization Alliance for a Better California, will begin running ads tomorrow. From Political Muscle:

Alliance for a Better California, the union-backed group that defeated Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s legislative agenda last year, starts a TV advertising blitz Tuesday for Phil Angelides.

The advertising buy is certainly multiple millions of dollars and could last through election day.

This is the big union buy Angelides has been waiting for. The ads say nothing about Angelides, however; they are all about Schwarzenegger. This is an independent expenditure, outside the control of the Angelides campaign.

Better late than never I suppose.  A big ad buy certainly would have been very helpful in July when Phil was being battered by the Schwarzenegger negative ads.  However, the unions have finally decided that Arnold really hasn’t changed.  It’s just to risky to gamble on who Arnold 17.0 will be.