(CA 80AD) Goodbye Bonnie Garcia Updated (Part I).

Terrific news for the CA 80th Assembly District.  Voter registration figures, donations, numbers of volunteers, good issues, and an expectation to win will combine to help us say ‘Adios, Gonnie Barcia (who is termed out), and the Repugnants (who are freaked out) at last!’


Voting and voter registration figures have long been trending Democratic in the Coachella ValleyAs indicated in my earlier post, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, and Coachella all gave John Kerry/John Edwards ticket majorities in 2004.  Given the mood of the electorate, it is clearly expected that these five cities, and probably more, will give the Democratic nominee a majority vote in 2008 as well.


Details below the flip…

Regarding voter registration, as of 2007, Palm Springs, now has the following voter registration figures:

  • Democrats  10,406    44%
  • Repugnants  8,507  36%
  • Other  853  4%
  • Decline to State  3,651  16%
  • Total  23,417  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  60%

In addition, Cathedral City, now has the following 2007 voter registration figures:

  • Democrats  6,788  38%
  • Repugnants  8,049  45%
  • Other  549  3%
  • Decline to State  2,467  14%
  • Total  17,853  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  52%

Meanwhile, Desert Hot Springs, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  2,266  33%
  • Repugnants  3,332  49%
  • Other  290  4%
  • Decline to State  978   14%
  • Total  6,866  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  47%

Indio, has the following 2007 voter registration figures:

  • Democrats  9,773  45%
  • Repugnants  8,654  40%
  • Other  623  3%
  • Decline to State  2,724  3%
  • Total  21,779  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  48%

And, finally, Coachella, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  4,907  64%
  • Repugnants  1,864  24%
  • Other  147  2%
  • Decline to State  709   9%
  • Total  7,619  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  73%

Regarding the less Democratic cities, Rancho Mirage, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  3,005  31%
  • Repugnants  5,018  52%
  • Other  261  3%
  • Decline to State  1,435   15%
  • Total  9,719  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  46%

La Quinta, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  4,522  28%
  • Repugnants  8,847  55%
  • Other  500  3%
  • Decline to State  2,164   13%
  • Total  9,719  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  41%

Palm Desert, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  6,975  30%
  • Repugnants  12,104  53%
  • Other  781  3%
  • Decline to State  3,172   14%
  • Total  9,719  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  44%

Indian Wells, has the following 2007 voter registration:

  • Democrats  549  18%
  • Repugnants  2,018  67%
  • Other  86  3%
  • Decline to State  348   12%
  • Total  9,719  100%
  • Total Democrats & Decline2State  30%


I have added the Democratic and the Decline to State percentages together as most Decline2Staters are presently voting Democratic and the trend is sure to continue as long as the Repugnants continue their petulance.

Information on donations, volunteers, issues, and expectations that will contribute to victory in the CA 80th Assembly Distict in November 2008 to follow.

California Democratic Challengers Will Not Soon Forget This Vote

I’ve been late on my Congressional roundup for September; I’ll probably get it up by the end of the week.  But I did want to wait and see which way House Republicans would vote on expanding SCHIP, a priority for the state and for the Governor.  Voting to leave sick children out in the cold is almost impossibly cruel, and will get the great big spotlight it deserves in 2008.  So how did they vote?

Mary Bono voted yes.  That’s it.  Every single other California House Republican voted to deny poor children health insurance.  John Doolittle, no.  Jerry Lewis, no.  Ken Calvert, no.  Gary Miller, no.  Brian Bilbray, no.  And David Dreier, not only no, but here’s a quote:

“It dramatically expands the welfare state,” said Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif.

I think Russ Warner just got the ammo he needed.  Somehow Republicans think this vote won’t boomerang back on them.

Because a veto is expected, much of the attention Tuesday was on the political fallout. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., chairman of the Republican congressional campaign committee, said Republicans will support a less costly compromise. “I don’t think it will be a decisive bill in the 2008 elections,” he said.

They’re wrong.  And even though I believe that the Democratic majority is committed enough to this program that they will keep voting on it until they get a veto-proof majority (they’re 24 votes away as it is), this vote will not be forgotten.  The ads will be written.  And the price will be paid.

For Lack Of A Candidate…

(Righting a bit of a wrong here. This should have been frontpaged when it first appeared; not everything is or should be about the day-to-day slugfest. – promoted by jsw)

For lack of a nail, the shoe was lost;
for lack of a shoe, the horse was lost;
for lack of a horse, the rider was lost;
for lack of a rider, the message was lost;
for lack of a message, the battle was lost;
for lack of a battle, the war was lost;
for lack of a war, the kingdom was lost.

Northern California Democrats have been hearing a lot lately about how the CDP is targeting two of our most important races, CA-11 and AD-15. Both of these districts have historically elected Republicans, with CA-11 holding a 5.5% Republican registration advantage and AD-15 recently dwindling to a 2% Republican advantage. Now that the AD-15 seat is turning over due to term limits, the CDP is hoping to pick up a new Democratic Assembly seat while protecting the sole Congressional gain that California Democrats made in 2006.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketUnfortunately, the Democratic definition of “targeting” seems to bear an uncanny resemblance to catnapping. Take, for example, the City of San Ramon elections for mayor and City Council that were scheduled for this November.

As is true in most locales, San Ramon’s city offices are considered non-partisan. Yet in San Ramon, the mayor and the entire City Council are all Republicans, despite the fact that city-wide Democratic registration  stands at 9,988 compared to 10,589 Republicans, with a pool of 6,033 DTS voters.

So exactly what happened to San Ramon’s November 2007 election? Well, there’s not going to be an election. That’s because when the August 10 filing deadline rolled around, nobody had filed to run for mayor against the Republican incumbent; nobody had filed to run for City Council against the Republican incumbents. With nobody challenging them at the polls, the three incumbents were appointed to new terms on August 20.

So how does the lack of a nail lose the war?

Well, for starters, San Ramon’s incumbent mayor, H. Abram Wilson, is also running for the Republican nomination for AD-15. As the highest-ranking elected in the race, he has excellent name recognition and a sizable network of supporters, all of which led to him being considered by many as the early favorite in the Republican field. But his pesky mayoral race was widely viewed as a big negative, siphoning his time, money and energy away from the AD race. Would he be able to spend the bulk of 2007 running for mayor and then immediately jump into a heated AD race?

He addressed those questions head-on earlier this summer:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketSan Ramon Mayor Abram Wilson has loaned his campaign $95,000. He has received $18,474 from other contributors.

Wilson described his loan as a pragmatic jump-start to his Assembly campaign, which he’s running concurrently with his re-election bid for mayor. San Ramon city elections will be held in November; the Assembly primary election is June 2008.

“People have asked me if I’m committed to the Assembly race because I am running for mayor and how could I do both,” Wilson said. “But when people see that you are willing to put your own funds in, they will see that you believe in yourself and you believe you can win.”

As of August 10, all of Wilson’s troubles vanished. Freed up from any work or expense in that mayoral race, he’s been able to focus exclusively on the AD-15 seat. That means that, three months ahead of schedule, all of his fundraising activities, along with all of his time and energy, are able to be fully deployed into the Assembly race, and the doubt that plagued his candidacy has been cast aside. Wilson’s position as the frontrunner seems stronger than ever.

And if Wilson wins the primary, he is clearly the most difficult of the Republican candidates for a Democrat to defeat. Genial, experienced, and very careful to present himself as a “moderate” Republican, Wilson’s presence on the November 2008 ballot would make the AD-15 seat that much more challenging for a Democrat to win.

But it’s not just AD-15 that’s impacted by the San Ramon race. As one of my readers pointed out, Jerry McNerney also has a dog in this hunt:

Why should building a farm team should be the responsibility of McNerney’s team?

He is the sole beneficiary. The farm team helps by eliminating officeholders down ballot that could be hostile and sling arrows at every opportunity they get. […]

Now I envision [Republican Congressional candidate Dean] Andal’s people using those GOP officeholders to close ranks and rally their base to take down McNerney, probably in direct mail to San Ramon and Danville voters, maybe not even use party affiliation, but just the fact that they are local office holders and they support Andal. It will be something like, “The entire City Council of San Ramon supports Dean Andal. Join us, as he shares our commitment to low taxes and economic growth” — or something like that.

So the Democrats’ inability to field a single candidate in San Ramon has serious consequences for a whole host of other races. And exactly who is to blame? Well, the list is long. As another of my readers pointed out, there was a fundamental failure at the local Democratic club and Central Committee level to get involved in the race and recruit candidates.

Likewise, with the CDP bragging loudly all year about how they were targeting AD-15 and CD-11, one might have imagined that, in addition to money, they would provide a little planning and a little effort on the ground. And, frankly, it just wasn’t that hard to look at the AD candidates, see Wilson as the strongest contender, and think, “Gee, maybe it would be good to throw up a few roadblocks to his campaign — like, you know, a competitor in his mayoral race.”

Then there’s Jerry McNerney, the Congressman who represents San Ramon. As the regional party leader, he had both the opportunity and the responsibility to recruit good candidates for the San Ramon races. And let’s face it, McNerney’s involvement in the race wouldn’t just have been an altruistic party-building mechanism; it would have come back to help him immeasurably — a classic win-win.

But instead, all of these Democrats complacently snoozed through the San Ramon city elections. So here we have, in this one race, a ripple that has the potential to be felt over a very large area. A contested race in San Ramon might have resulted in a Democratic counter-balance to the all-Republican San Ramon city government, might have helped build the Democratic base locally, might have helped develop a bench of Democratic officeholders, might have hampered the strongest Republican in his AD-15 primary race, and might even have shored up Jerry McNerney’s Congressional base. We’ll never know, though, because it didn’t happen.

This post is an amalgam of posts found here and here and here at The Progressive Connection.

San Diego Quarterly in Pictures and Open Thread

(Get your give on – promoted by Lucas O’Connor)

With the San Francisco and Los Angeles Quarterlies ready to kick off tomorrow (watch out LA, I’m coming), let’s take a pictoral tour through last week’s San Diego event.  Consider this an open thread, but focus on how great Calitics is :).


Some of the last revelers of the night (L to R: cmanaster, Ron Shepston, orangeclouds115, Major Danby, a very demonic looking Lucas O’Connor)


Future Congressman Nick Leibham (center, CA-50) and Ron Shepston (right, CA-42) talk shop with Greg Diamond/Major Danby.  Consider Rove nullified.


Mike Lumpkin (CA-52) talks strategy with Ira Lechner.  Dunc Jr. is not ready for this campaign.


Steve Filson chats with Leon Thompson, bringing some Bay-Area perspective to the locals.


Todd Gloria blogs and talks at the same time (with tface1000 lurking in the shadows).  Half of San Diego’s city council is turning over next year due to term limits, and he’s after one of the seats.


I get caught a bit rosy cheeked talking with Miriam Raftery and Leon Thompson.  I’m not drunk, I’m just drinking.


But best of all, surprise live music just for us!

Undue Praise For Chicken Little Shouldn’t Scare California Homeowners

The lead story on the SF Chronicle's website is an article singing the praises of California Real Estate blogger Patrick Killelea who runs the site Reality Parser.

The gist of the article is how smart Killelea is because he saw the burst of the California housing bubble coming.  Nevermind the fact that his prediction was eight years too early.  In fact, he was so smart that he didn't buy a house in Berkeley in 1999 because the market was just too overpriced.

How smart was Chicken Little's decision?  Read the flip

The article describes how smart Killelea was by not buying a house at the height of the dot-com bubble:

In 1999, he and his wife tried to buy a house in Berkeley at the height of both the dot-com bubble and housing mania.

“It all felt rigged,” he said. “Everything was set up to get me to overbid and not do an inspection; basically throw caution to the wind. It just felt really wrong. I felt like a sheep among wolves.”

After being consistently outbid, the couple decided to rent instead. They found a charming Menlo Park two-bedroom on a tree-lined street for $2,700 a month. After a couple of years when the rental market softened, they asked for a rent reduction and now pay $2,350. “I would be paying out and losing about three times as much” to own the equivalent house, he said. “In some big urban areas like Manhattan and the Bay Area, it may never be cheaper to own” than rent.

His theory is that people are better off not buying a home.  Instead, they should rent and use the money that they “save” to invest in other ways. 

Killelea does contract programming work but said he can take off months at a time from his $100-an-hour software gigs because he took his savings from renting instead of buying, invested in the stock market and did quite well. His last job ended in March and he's just thinking about looking for a new one.

Now wait a minute.  There's no dispute that there's been a slow-down in the California housing market this year.  But does that really mean that families shouldn't buy houses that they can afford because the market is too “overpriced”? 

Let's take Killelea's own story as an example.  He was scared to buy in Berkeley in 1999 because, at the height of the dot-com boom, he was worried that prices were too high.  Well, as it turns out, in 1999, the median price of a home in Alameda County was $289,000.  Had Mr. Killelea purchased that home, he probably would have put 20 percent ($57,800) down and would have financed the remaining 80 percent with a mortgage paying interest at around 7 percent.

Last month, even after all the problems in the economy, the mortgage market, and the housing sector, the median price of a home in Alameda County is $660,000.  

If Killelea had bought that median home in Alameda County in 1999, at the height of the dotcom boom when everyone was sure that home prices had peaked, it now would be worth $371,000 more than he paid for it. And because he only needed to put a 20 percent down payment, that translates to a 641% rate of return on his money.

If Killelea considers an eight-year return of 641 percent to be shabby, then god bless him. Killelea says he did “quite well” by investing in the stock market instead of buying a home.  How well?  Well, if he had invested the same $57,800 in the S&P 500, he would have realized a return of about 17 percent (about $10k) in the same time period.    “Quite well,” or just about keeping up with inflation?  I don't think anyone is retiring early based on stock investments in 1999.  Personally, I would rather have the $371,000 profit over the $10,000 profit.  Call me crazy. 

There are many problems in our housing market, many of which were caused by irrational speculation.  And many counties in California and across the country have been hit much harder than the Bay Area.  But that doesn't mean that people who can afford to shouldn't buy a home to live in. 

I hope Killelea is not actually convincing Californians to make the same stupid decision he made by not buying a home they can afford.  And it is irresponsible for the San Francisco Chronicle to report such irrational alarmism without any real counter-argument.