The Edwards Tax Plan: Reward Work — Not Wealth

The old saying goes:

“The only things Inevitable in Life, are Death and Taxes!”

These are both unpleasant subjects, and since political candidates can’t really do a lot about one, this diary will be exploring the other — Taxes.

John Edwards has based his campaign on hard hitting messages about the need for “Economic Parity” in our Country — this Diary will be taking a serious look at what Edwards will do about Taxes.

The Senator often says “I do not wanting to live in a Country made up of the Super-Rich and Everybody Else!”  

That’s not the America we all grew up in. Each year achieving the American Dream becomes more and more difficult. What are working people to do, in this society of Haves and Have-Nots?

Is John’s tough Campaign Rhetoric just Talk, or does he actually have the Plans to Back it up?

Turn the page, to see where the “Rhetoric meet Reality” when it comes to that annual April Ritual, most hard-working American love to hate — spelled I.R.S.

Solutions like UHC and stopping Global Warming will take Money — where’s ALL that money going to come from?

First the Documents to be discussed:

The Policy Summary Document:

John Edwards: The Plan to Build One America  [pdf1]

http://johnedwards.com/issues/…

—-

The Edwards Issue Page on Tax Reform:

http://www.johnedwards.com/tax…

—-

The Policy Details Document:



Building One Economy with Tax Reform to Reward Work
 [pdf2]

http://johnedwards.com/issues/…

—-

Here’s where regular Working Americans start getting some Respect again in our Economic System (as expressed in an incomprehensible Tax Code), which all too often favors only those Wealthy enough to “work the system”:

John Edwards’ Tax Reform to Reward Work [from pdf1]

The Goals:  


“Our tax code has shifted most of the burden onto the backs of working Americans. There is simply no end to the special tax breaks available to big corporations and wealthy individuals who can afford lawyers and lobbyists.


“It’s time to end the President’s war on work. And it’s time to restore fairness to a tax code that has been driven badly out of whack.”

– Remarks on “Restoring Economic Fairness,” July 26, 2007

The Summary


John Edwards will rewrite our tax code to make it simpler and fairer and to help hard-working families succeed. Millions of working and middle-class families will keep more of their paychecks. Those at the very top will again pay their fair share.

The Edwards Tax Reform Plan — Policy Points

(1) New tax breaks to Strengthen the Middle Class

The Goals:


“It’s time for us to put our economy back in line with our values and strengthen three pillars of America’s middle class: savings, work and family.”

The Steps: to Strengthen the Middle Class


 (A) Encourage Savings

   (a) Establish a new Get Ahead tax credit to match up to $500 a year in retirement savings for families earning up to $75,000.

   (b) Create new Work Bonds to offer extra savings incentives for low-income workers.

 (B) Reward Work

   (a) Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) to reward low-wage workers by tripling the EITC for single adults and cutting the marriage penalty.


[ some key details from pdf-2: ]

– Edwards will expand the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit to pay up to 50 percent of childcare expenses up to $5,000 and make it partially refundable to benefit low-income working families. He will also allow stay-at-home parents to get the credit to help pay for child care for newborn infants.

– Triple the EITC for 4 Million Adults without Children: A single worker at the poverty line pays more than $800 in federal income and payroll taxes. Edwards will offer more than $1,200 to poor single workers, tripling the current EITC, and it will give 4 million low-income workers an average tax cut of $750.

– Edwards believes that we must cut the EITC marriage penalty. His proposal will cut taxes for 3 million couples by about $400 a year.

 (C) Support Families

   (a) More than double the Child and Dependent Care Credit to up to $2,500 per child.

(2) Reward work, not just wealth, and Repeal the Bush tax breaks for the Wealthy

The Goals:

“It’s time to stop promoting the wealth of the wealthy and start making sure that everyone has the chance to move up the economic ladder.”

The Steps: to Repeal the Bush tax breaks


 (A) Restore Fair Taxation of Wealth

   (a) Restore the investment income tax rate to 28 percent for Americans making more than $250,000 a year so that wealthy investors don’t pay a lower rate on investments than many regular Americans pay on wages.


[ some key details from pdf-2: ]

To ensure that the wealthiest Americans are paying their fair share of taxes and to reduce the economic distortions from tax shelters resulting from large capital gains preferences, Edwards will raise the top tax rate on long-term capital gains to 28 percent for the most fortunate taxpayers, the same rate signed into law by President Reagan. The 28 percent rate will ensure that high-income investors will pay taxes on their investment income at a similar rate to what regular families pay on their earned income.

   (b) Repeal the Bush tax cuts for households earning more than $200,000 a year.


[ some key details from pdf-2: ]

More than half of the Bush tax cuts – $132 billion – will go to the top 1 percent of taxpayers in 2010. Edwards will repeal the Bush tax cuts for the highest-income households. He will also eliminate estate taxes for the middle class, small business owners and family farmers, while keeping these taxes on the few families with large estates above $4 million in value.

   (c) Keep the tax on very largest inheritances while protecting family businesses and family farms.

 (B) Simplify Taxes

   (a) Simplify taxes for up to 50 million families by giving them the option of letting the IRS complete a first draft of their forms for “five-minute filing.”

(3) Shut down special Loopholes for insiders

The Goals:

[ some key details from pdf-2: ]

Declare War on Tax Havens: About $300 billion a year in taxes go unpaid, and about $1.5 trillion in personal assets of U.S. taxpayers are held offshore. These unpaid taxes increase the share of the tax burden shouldered by honest taxpayers. Edwards will end the abuse of foreign tax havens: low-tax countries that facilitate American corporations and wealthy individuals seeking to avoid U.S. taxes.

Close the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Loopholes: Some of the most highly paid people in America are the managers of hedge funds and private equity funds, some of whom make hundreds of millions of dollars or even billions a year. Although most of their income, like other earned income, is nothing more than payment for the work they do, they pay only the 15 percent capital gains rate rather than the ordinary income tax rate. Edwards will close this loophole and also ensure that publicly traded private equity and hedge funds pay corporate taxes.

Cap Executive Pensions: Top executives at large corporations commonly receive deferred compensation packages that allow them to put off indefinitely the payment of taxes on much of their compensation. They have in effect unlimited IRAs or 401(k)s, without the limits that apply to other workers. Edwards will limit the amount of money that can be put into these funds to $1 million a year.

The Steps: to Shut down special Loopholes

 (A) Declare War on Offshore Tax Havens

   (a) Edwards will fight offshore tax havens by working with other nations to fight tax evasion, crack down on tax shelter promoters and eliminate special tax breaks for corporations’ offshore investments.


[ some key details from pdf-2: ]

– Extend the time the I.R.S. has to investigate offshore tax havens

– Crack down on peddlers of tax shelters by increasing penalties, prohibiting contingent fee arrangements for tax advisors, and eliminating the ability to patent tax shelters.

– Fight the tax gap by … auditing more large corporations and high-income individuals

 (B) Close the Tax Gap

   (a) Edwards will collect a greater share of the $300 billion in uncollected taxes every year through better IRS service, targeting audits at wealthy individuals and corporations likely to have committed evasion, and requiring more third-party reporting.

 (C) Close Hedge Fund and Private Equity Loopholes

   (a) Edwards will close the loophole that elite Wall Street traders use to pay only 15 percent in taxes on their huge incomes, while regular families often pay twice that amount.

Impressive goals and steps!  How does the Plan stack up?

Edwards Tax Plan:  Reward Work Not Wealth

The Reviews:  [ from pdf1: ]

“Former North Carolina senator John Edwards has a tax plan that is… smarter, targeted at taxpayers who need the most help and at creating incentives for savings.”

– Washington Post editorial

“Edwards, at least, is willing to say which taxes he would raise to keep the deficit from going through the roof…. Edwards deserves points for honesty. …”

– E.J. Dionne, Washington Post columnist

“We need a president and a tax system that will grow the middle class, not the gap between the haves and have-nots. John Edwards has a fair tax plan that will help middle-class families and promote healthy economic growth.”

– Betty Yee, Chairwoman, California State Board of Equalization

Sound like these Reforms would indeed go a long ways to achieving Economic Fairness in the Country again — a tax system that will grow the middle class — now that really would be something!

If we stay with the “status quo” and continue with “Business as Usual” —

America could indeed become like the gated city on the hill,  

made up of the “super rich” who “run everything” —

(the top 1%)

and “everybody else” —

who just get “run over”!

It’s time to take down that Wall of a Tax Code too!

It’s time to Reward Work — instead of just Wealth!

It’s time to support John Edwards!

Fresno Bee’s bizarre logic on Prop 93

Disclosure: I do some work for Yes on 93.

In today’s Fresno Bee, the editorial board takes a whack at Prop 93. Fair enough, I can handle a little criticism. But I’d like to go through this a little bit.

Term limits should be changed. They haven’t worked as well as voters once hoped. The net effect of term limits has been to reduce the experience level of those who serve in Sacramento, elevate the role of special interests and their lobbyists, and turn electoral cycles into an unending marathon on fundraising and focusing on the next job, rather than on California’s increasingly serious problems.(Fresno Bee 12.3.07)

Now that’s something I can agree with, and something that I’m guessing most progressives would agree with. So, a reasonable start there. But then they get into their hang up: redistricting. Why are term limits and redistricting related? Why because the governor said so of course! Silly Californians.  And boy are these guys angry about the lack of movement on redistricting!

If it is passed, Núñez, Perata and many other incumbents could run for re-election in the June primary. Many of them would still be around when the time comes, after the 2010 census, to draw the legislative boundaries again. That’s a recipe for preserving the gerrymandering that currently makes a mockery of state elections.

But this message is a bizarre one. Basically they want to keep the merry go round spinning until they find a group of legislators that wants to, I don’t know, bend to their superior logic or something. What evidence do they have that any new set of legislators would get with the Fresno Bee program? Well, none, and furthermore Speaker Nunez wasn’t even in the legislature when the current lines were drawn. They present no evidence that anything would change if we have new leadership, and it’s doubtful that it would. But, they don’t like Núñez and Perata, so boo to them, and boo to Prop 93.

But ultimately Prop 93 isn’t about Núñez, Perata, or any other current legislator. It’s about trying to get a system that will work better for the state of California.  The Bee decries the current system, but when somebody tries to change it, they get blasted for not towing to some other random issue.  

So, the question for the Bee is this: Would you really have supported Prop 93 if there was a redistricting proposal? Would that have made everything all hunky dory, or would there have been some other issue? I guess we’ll never know, but I have my ideas on the subject.

Dirty Tricksters Caught on Video: CBS Evening News Edition

Just before Thanksgiving, I posted my video showing the illegal tactics that the Republicans are willing to use in order to get signatures on their so-called “Electoral College Reform Initiative” – a ballot proposal that in reality is yet another election-stealing Republican dirty trick.  And now, my video has just been featured nationally on the CBS Evening News.

In just a matter of days, the 2008 presidential election may actually be decided. In California. By progressives like you.

Because of your grassroots and netroots activism, the GOP’s California ballot initiative campaign to steal the White House — what the New York Times called an "elaborate dirty trick" designed by a "shadowy group" to "do serious damage to our democracy" — is under significant pressure.

Time is running out on these dirty tricksters and we need your help to finish them off. With signature-gathering deadlines looming to place the so-called "Electoral College Reform Initiative" (ECRI) on the June ballot, we’ve caught Republican dirty tricksters red-handed on video.

The full story is over the fold…

This message from Rick Jacobs mentions the oustanding sleuthing from UCSB graduate student and Calitics contributor VikingKingq, who wrote here at Calitics and at DailyKos of his encounters with the dirty tricksters.  After he called the Courage Campaign, I went out with a video camera.  Let’s let Rick finish the story:

Right before Thanksgiving — in an action inspired by a Daily Kos blogger’s diary — we emailed Courage Campaign supporters a YouTube video exposing a potentially illegal "children with cancer" bait-and-switch tactic used by signature gatherers to get Californians to sign and support ECRI. After we provided documentation a few days later, Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s office told us they were considering an investigation.

Now, the CBS Evening News is on the case. On Saturday night, CBS used portions of that Courage Campaign video to expose millions to the right-wing cabal behind "California Counts," the gang of Republican dirty tricksters — linked to Rudy Giuliani  — who are trying to steal the White House in 2008. 

Please watch the CBS Evening News report on YouTube by clicking here and then consider making a $55 contribution to support our work to kill this dirty trick. Without your financial support, we could not have produced the video exposing these sneaky signature-gatherers, Secretary Bowen would not be considering an investigation, and CBS would not be reporting this news to millions:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/55

If this Rovian dirty trick is successful, at least 20 of California’s Electoral College votes — the equivalent of Ohio — will be allocated to the Republican presidential nominee.

The consequences could be catastrophic for our country and the world. Four more years of Iraq, Iran, torture, and warrantless wiretapping. Four more years of crisis, from the climate to health care and the economy. And, four more years to give right-wing extremists the opportunity to turn a conservative Supreme Court majority into concrete.

That’s why these desperate right-wingers are hell-bent on using apparently illegal signature-gathering tactics to get this initiative on the ballot so they can lock down the White House for decades.

We need your financial support now to kill this dirty trick dead. How much would you donate to protect California’s 55 Electoral College votes from the Republicans? Just $5.50? How about $55? Or even $550? To help us save California from becoming another Florida or Ohio, can you contribute $5.50, $55, or $550 on ActBlue today?

http://www.couragecampaign.org/55

At the heart of the Courage Campaign is a mission to leverage online organizing to empower bloggers and grassroots activists in California. We are a new kind of organization, waging a new kind of campaign, practicing a new kind of politics.

From a blogger writing a diary on Daily Kos to a national broadcast on the CBS Evening News, this is what people-powered progressive politics looks like:  

First, Steven Attewell, an eagle-eyed blogger on Daily Kos, posted a community diary about the "children with cancer" bait-and-switch by California Counts signature gatherers at UC Santa Barbara. Courage Campaign staffer Erik Love immediately talked with Attewell and worked with me and Online Political Director Julia Rosen to deploy a grassroots film crew to capture the dirty tricksters in the act. Calitics blogger Dave Dayen quickly edited the raw video. Finally, the day before Thanksgiving, we emailed the video to Courage Campaign supporters asking for reports of any similar sneaky signature-gathering tactics witnessed over the holiday weekend.

Dozens of first-hand reports from the grassroots came pouring in to the Courage Campaign. Erik then contacted the chief of the Secretary of State’s Fraud Investigations Unit, who indicated the tactics used were likely illegal. Finally, I sent an official request to Secretary Bowen asking her to open up a formal investigation.

With signature submission deadlines looming, time is running out on these right-wing dirty tricksters. To continue our campaign to expose these signature schemes, please watch the CBS report and then make a timely donation to Courage of $5.50, $55, or $550 on ActBlue so we can kill this dirty trick and protect California’s 55 electoral votes:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/55

Whether or not an investigation is launched, Secretary Bowen and County Registrars will be examining hundreds of thousands of petitions submitted by California Counts in the coming weeks to determine if enough legal signatures have been collected. The more sunlight we all can continue to shine on these sneaky signature gatherers in the next few days, the less of a chance this shady scheme will qualify for the June ballot.

You are on the ground floor of a new movement led by the Courage Campaign to synergize the netroots with the grassroots to achieve a progressive vision for California. Now, as we battle these devious dirty tricksters from deadline to deadline, we need your support to make that vision a reality.

Thank you for everything you are doing to create progressive change in California and the country.

Rick Jacobs
Chair

P.S. As Bradley Whitford ("Josh Lyman" on The West Wing) said in a Courage Campaign YouTube video last month, if the dirty trick succeeds…  

"That, my friends, would be the ballgame."

To help us fight these right-wing extremists down to the wire, please make a critical contribution of $5.50, $55, or $550 right now to protect California’s 55 electoral votes via ActBlue, the online community tool that empowers anyone to fundraise online for progressive candidates and causes:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/55

 

Arnold to support “California Voters First” Redistricting Initiative

(I’ve added the audio of the press conference. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketToday the Governator announced that he would support the “California Voters First” Initiative, a plan to take away districting of the state Legislature from the Legislators. The plan does not include Congressional apportionment:

Schwarzenegger threw his weight Monday behind a proposed ballot initiative supported California Common Cause, AARP, the League of Women Voters of California and the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce. Under the measure, called the “California Voters First Act,” a 14-member independent citizens commission would be created to draw boundaries for the Legislature and state Board of Equalization. Congressional boundaries would continue to be drawn by the Legislature, an apparent concession to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Schwarzenegger said he will campaign and gather signatures statewide for the initiative. He did not say whether he also would contribute to or raise funds for the campaign. “He’s committed to doing whatever it takes,” spokeswoman Julie Soderlund said.(SacBee 12.3.07)

Whatever it takes, huh? Well, this initiative doesn’t demand redistricting until we get new census data in 2010, so that’s a step in the right direction. And the exclusion of the Congress keeps Speaker Pelosi and her interests out of the campaign.  She had previously vowed to defeat any measure that included Congress. I suppose she’s not as concerned about who holds which seat in the Legislature as she is about holding some strings over Congressional seats. Flip it…

There are positives and negatives here. For a start, this only puts a few seats in play. You can only make LA so competitive. Unless you want to take very narrow strips that go from the ocean into Riverside County, you just aren’t going to be able to make the seats “competitive”. Same thing with the Bay area. That’s just the way it is.

But, where more balanced seats can be drawn, redistricting isn’t all bad for Democrats. If we pick up a couple of seats in the Senate and several in the Assembly, we’ll command 2/3 majorities.  And that idea

But one thing here, some of the Democrats in these closer seats won’t look exactly like we’d like them to look. Some will look like the Baca brand of milquetoast “moderate” Democratic politics. It seems to happen that way, Dems seem to love to nominate milquetoast when the seats get tight. Not so for the Republicans. Does anybody honestly expect any Republicans to get through legislative primaries without signing Grover Norquist’s ridiculous anti-tax pledge?

And of course, we’ll have to work harder on some of these middling seats.  More resources will be spent in these races where the primary was the general, but on the other hand, the same will be true of the GOP.

So, check out the initiative. It will likely appear on the Nov 2008 ballot.