After 28 Years of Republican Domination, Can a Democrat Win in the 52nd Congressional District?

If the candidate is Mike Lumpkin, victory in November is not only possible, but perhaps likely.  Granted, there is still a primary election in June, but at a forum last week hosted by the League of Women Voters, Vickie Butcher proved once again that she had no command of the issues.  For much of the debate she seemed lost and unable to formulate a coherent answer for questions on healthcare, the economy and the war on terror.  It was painful, at times, to watch her struggle with issues on which she clearly had not researched.  Though a pleasant and accomplished educator, Vickie Butcher is simply over her head in this race.  As dismal as her prospects for congressional success are, however, those of Mike Lumpkin not only give Democrats encouragement, but the best likelihood for victory since 1980 when a young Duncan Hunter edged out a victory against a Democrat incumbent by the name of Lionel Van Deerling.

Lumpkin is a retired Navy SEAL Commander with both combat and leadership experience.  Those qualifications alone will earn him a significant number of cross-over votes, which will be necessary in the conservative 52nd.  If that isn’t enough, he is moderate and pragmatic on the issues and can pull off what Duncan Hunter was unable to do in his entire time as the district’s representative-provide fair representation to all citizens of the district, not just those who support his campaign.

Lumpkin’s campaign will not be an easy one, however.  Though Duncan Hunter is relinquishing his seat, his name may still be on the ballot.  Duncan D. Hunter, Jr. has moved back to California to keep the seat in the family, though not without a fight.  His strongest opponent in the Republican primary-Brian Jones-is mounting an aggressive, but bleak grassroots campaign.  Jones has not been intimidated by the Hunter dynasty and has repeatedly attacked Jr. for his lack of commitment to curb the use of earmarks.

Any of the Republican candidates will have to face a formidable Mike Lumpkin in the General.  The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), which will help fund the top 29 congressional races in order to attain a super-majority in the House, has recently upgraded Lumpkin’s campaign from 20 to 14 and considers his resume the best of any congressional candidate in an open-seat race.  Additionally, a recent Rasmussen poll suggests 2008 is not going to be a good year for the Republicans.  He’s the underdog now, but keep an eye on Mike Lumpkin.  His will be the race to watch.

Arnold to attend a “Yacht Party”?

I swear, I did not make this up. Josh Richman, who writes for some of the Bay Area newspapers, has this sweet little post at his political blog:

A public relations consultant for Frauscher, a European yacht manufacturer, says Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will attend the unveiling of the world’s first hybrid yacht engine this Friday morning, May 16, at San Francisco’s St. Francis Yacht Club

It’s just too easy, I can’t do it. So, feel free to insert your own funny comment here.

SF: Marriage Judgment Rally

SAN FRANCISCO (May 14, 2008) — City Attorney Dennis Herrera will emcee a media availability at 12:00 noon on Thursday, May 15, in the Rotunda area of San Francisco City Hall to respond to the ruling by the California Supreme Court on the coordinated cases challenging the constitutionality of state marriage laws that discriminate against gay and lesbian partners.  The Supreme Court has issued notification that the ruling is scheduled to be released at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow, May 15, 2008.  There is no word as yet on what the forthcoming ruling will be.

WHAT:

Media Availability on Supreme Court Ruling in Marriage Cases

WHEN:

12:00 p.m., Thursday, May 15, 2008

WHERE:

Rotunda Area

San Francisco City Hall

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place

WHO:

* Emcee: City Attorney Dennis Herrera

* Expected speakers: Mayor Gavin Newsom; Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart and NCLR Legal Director Shannon Minter; NCLR Executive Director Kate Kendell; other City officials.

* Numerous couples involved in the cases are additionally expected to attend, and will be available for interviews.

The consolidated cases before the high court are: In re Marriage Cases (S147999).

 

Marriage Case Rumors

(I want to make sure I re-emphasize the first sentence. I do not know the outcome. I can only look to the judgment and hope that what I have here is complete and utter balderdash. As shayera said at dKos today, this is one of those times that I hope I totally screwed up. So, I look to tomorrow optimistically, with complete awareness of the fact that either way we have a long, hard fight in front of us. – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

UPDATE: I’ve decided to re-title this to reinforce the flimsiness of this stuff.  I’ve gotten word that the clerk was planning on changing roles for some time.  So, I’m going wait and see. Only 3 hours left anyway.

I don’t traditionally ply in loosely sourced rumors, but here I go. Some troubling news has emerged from the California Supreme Court regarding In re Marriage Cases due to be announced tomorrow. First, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar’s only openly gay law clerk abruptly resigned today. I’m still looking to get additional details on this, but I am told that there was no indication of the resignation prior to today. If you have any further details on this, shoot me an email.

Next, from another source intimately familiar with the case and the Court, I’m hearing that the Court is prepared to take a step that stands in stark contrast to their bold and courageous position in Perez v. Sharp. Specifically, it looks like we might get a decision that dramatically rules against granting individuals the freedom to marry whomever they choose. The total voting correctly could be limited to one justice (if even that) by dissenting from a decision that would be looked back upon as a cop-out at best.

Leadership takes courage. Some have it. Others do not.