Multiple Paths To Block Arnold’s Budget Vetoes

Arnold Schwarzenegger’s crazy, reckless budget vetoes have been getting a lot of attention around the state in the last 24 hours or so, and have led Democrats to vow to fight these cuts. So how exactly can that happen, given that Democrats embraced billions in other cuts just last week?

There are three emerging tracks for fighting these cuts. The first is the Courage Campaign’s call for a veto override session. (Note: I am of course the Public Policy Director at the Courage Campaign.) We’re asking our members to contact Speaker Karen Bass and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg to call the legislature back into session and override the vetoes.

Some might contend that this is either not likely to happen, or if an override were attempted, it would fail. I’m not so sure that’s the case. The US Congress overrode precious few of Bush’s vetoes, but they came extremely close to overriding Bush’s 2007 veto of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) – the votes were there in the Senate to override, including 17 Republicans, and the veto override fell just a few votes short of the 2/3 mark in the House.

Overriding a gubernatorial veto is less difficult in California, where Democrats are very close to having 2/3rds majorities in both houses. It stands to reason that Republicans would be under intense pressure to override vetoes to protect children’s health care, domestic violence programs, HIV/AIDS programs, and state parks.

Sure, we all know that the Republican Party in California is insanely right-wing. But even they have their limits. Several of their number are running for statewide office in 2010, giving Democrats an opportunity to leverage them in support of widely popular programs. Dems would also be able to use a veto override to target vulnerable Republican seats in their bid to win a 2/3 majority in the 2010 election.

The best political strategies are those that have multiple avenues of success. In addition to the Courage Campaign veto override action, legislators are stepping up their attack on the line-item vetoes as being illegal. John Pérez offered this statement today:

“The Constitution gives the governor considerable power over the budget, but it doesn’t give him the power to make it up as he goes along. While I consider these cuts criminal morally, they are in fact illegal in the eyes of the law,” said Pérez, who has called for an

immediate restoration of the funds that were cut. “It is wrong for ordinary Californians to suffer so the Governor can spare oil, alcohol and tobacco companies from paying their fair share.”

The California State Constitution gives the Governor “line-item” veto authority, permitting him to “reduce or eliminate one or more items of

appropriation while approving other portions of a bill” [Cal. Const. Art. IV, Section 10(e)]. However, this line-item veto authority only

applies to “appropriations.” When the Legislature takes an item of appropriation – like the budget signed by the Governor and enacted into law this past February – and passes a new bill that reduces the amount of that appropriation, that new bill is not an appropriation because it does not give anyone more authority to spend state money – it takes away spending authority.

While legislators have talked of aggrieved parties taking this to court, Controller John Chiang is reviewing whether the vetoes are legal and constitutional:

While the governor signed the budget revision yesterday, Democratic state Controller John Chiang is charged with carrying out his budget. Earlier this week, Chiang spokeswoman Hallye Jordan said the controller’s legal staff was reviewing whether the governor’s line-item vetoes were constitutional.

If Chiang does carry out Schwarzenegger’s vetoes, expect advocacy groups to file suit against Chiang. If Chiang does not carry them out, expect another legal battle between Schwarzenegger and the controller.

The governor’s office is taunting Democrats, convinced that this is all just sturm und drang without any likelihood of materializing into an actual reversal of the cuts:

Department of Finance Director Mike Genest predicted Tuesday that Democrats would not challenge the vetoes because “they have something to lose, too.” His comment suggested that Democrats know full well that it is difficult to find another $489 million in savings — and they might be better off politically allowing the governor to bear the brunt of criticism for the cuts he did implement yesterday.

I read this as Genest wanting to actually avoid a veto session. The cuts Arnold made are extremely unpopular – even Abel Maldonado has called the cuts “too severe”. The governor’s office probably realizes they would be vulnerable in an actual veto session.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is out on a limb. Let’s saw it off by calling a veto session and reversing these heinous cuts.

Over the flip is the email the Courage Campaign sent to our members today.

Dear Robert —

Using his line-item veto power, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger just made $489 million in NEW cuts to California’s budget. Together, we can stop him and save lives — but we don’t have much time.

These new budget cuts will hurt people. These cuts may even kill people.

Even worse, these cuts are in addition to the devastating cuts included in the budget agreement passed by the legislature last week. Below are just a few of the horrific details. Arnold’s new budget cuts will:

Cut HIV/AIDS services by at least $52 million

Eliminate $178 million for services that provide children with health care

Reduce support to domestic violence victim services by $16 million

This doesn’t have to happen. The state legislature has the power to override these vetoes and save these vital services that Gov. Schwarzenegger is trying to destroy.

First, Assembly Speaker Karen Bass and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg need to call legislators back to Sacramento for a special session to override the Governor’s horrific vetoes. But, quite honestly, the chances of this happening are small unless Californians demand it.

To stop these cuts before they take effect, we have to act now. That’s why we need you to contact Speaker Bass and Senate President Pro Tem Steinberg right now and ask them to call legislators back to Sacramento for a veto override session. Just click here to make your voice heard ASAP:

http://www.couragecampaign.org…

After hearing the news, State Senator Mark Leno told the media that “my colleagues and I will fight these devastating cuts with everything we have.”

Bass, Steinberg and Leno are claiming that the vetoes are illegal and plan to go to court to stop the cuts from taking place.

We applaud this action, but we don’t have to wait for the courts to rule. The Legislature can stop these cuts by overriding the vetoes right now. It’s time for Californians to stand up and insist that our legislators take immediate action and pledge to reverse Gov. Schwarzenegger’s new budget cuts.

Time is short. You can try to stop these devastating new cuts by calling on Speaker Bass and Senate President Pro Tem Steinberg right now to override the Gov. Schwarzenegger’s line-item vetoes. Just click here to make your voice heard today:

http://www.couragecampaign.org…

Thank you for taking action. Together, we can save our state before it’s too late.

Robert Cruickshank

Public Policy Director, Courage Campaign

3 thoughts on “Multiple Paths To Block Arnold’s Budget Vetoes”

  1. I’ve been skeptical of some of your strategy, but this one’s a winner.

    Tell Steinberg to get his butt in gear and call the Senate back in session.  And Bass needs to do the same with the Assembly.

  2. Hey thanks for trying and I sent my e-mails, but I don’t think the Republicans will feel any pressure at all. They are trogs through and through. They seem to wear heartlessness as a badge of courage and honor!

    Mark

Comments are closed.