What’s next: Blackwater home visits?

Here’s the latest “high tech” weapon in Gov. Schwarzenegger’s war on 450,000 elderly, blind and disabled Californians.

Without any authority from the Legislature, the Schwarzenegger Administration is planning to purchase up to $5 million worth of military/security cameras to take pictures of the 465,000 seniors and people with disabilities who receive In Home Supportive Services (IHSS) homecare.

The “MorphoTrak” cameras are currently being used in Iraq and other military locations. According to their manufacturer, they are also recommended for, among other things, “border crossings, gang enforcement, and airport/maritime security.”  The camera itself costs $4,200, plus hundreds of dollars more for docking stations and other equipment.

Last year, the Legislature approved the administration’s demand that county social workers must fingerprint all IHSS consumers as part of a so-called anti-fraud initiative targeting the program.  However, the Legislature neither discussed nor approved photographing consumers. Nor has the administration provided any evidence of how much fraud would be stopped by photographing/fingerprinting these consumers. Under the law, all IHSS consumers must be visited and assessed at home by county social workers before being approved for the program.

The Administration has projected that it will need to purchase 600 to 1,000 of these cameras, costing between $3 million and $5 million. It has borrowed several of these devices from the manufacturer and has solicited Sacramento and San Diego Counties to use them in a pilot project beginning April 1.

The District Attorneys in these two counties have been among the strongest advocates for the administration’s anti-fraud campaign.  However, a recent report from Sacramento County found a total of 19 potential cases of IHSS fraud out of more than 20,000 consumers.

Each $5,000 used to buy a “MorphoTrak” camera would purchase nearly 500 hours of IHSS homecare.

Herb Mayer, 79 year old IHSS consumer, chair of the IHSS coalition and a Korean war veteran, said “My social worker knows who I am without needing a $5,000 camera. How can the administration find money for these cameras but no money to keep the IHSS program going?”

Assemblymember Hector De La Torre (D- South Gate) said: “I am outraged that this administration is again targeting our lowest income seniors and people with disabilities as if they were criminals we need to monitor. How is that we can afford millions for cameras yet we continue to cut their services and the money they live on?”

“This Administration’s misguided attack on alleged fraud in the IHSS program has already caused major disruptions to IHSS services for 450,000 elderly Californians who depend on these services,” said Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco). “The small investment in home support for the elderly keeps consumers out of expensive nursing homes and saves the state money. We intend to use our legislative oversight power to ensure the Governor does not waste government resources and harm elderly Californians who desperately need In Home Support Services.”

“The Administration’s proposal to spend $5 million on cameras is ridiculous,” said Assemblymember Dave Jones (D-Sacramento).  “The money for each $5,000 camera could instead be used for 500 hours of IHSS care. The Administration has asked Sacramento County to begin a pilot program with loaner cameras on April 1. I am calling on Sacramento District Attorney Jan Scully not to participate in this misguided program


“It is bad enough that the Schwarzenegger Administration treats 450,000 of our most vulnerable citizens and the people who serve them like common criminals,” said Doug Moore, executive director of UDW Homecare Providers Union. “Now, to add insult to injury, the administration wants to waste millions of taxpayer dollars on these unauthorized and totally unnecessary cameras. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so tragic.”

6 thoughts on “What’s next: Blackwater home visits?”

  1. Der Fuhrer??? I have a constitutional right to privacy and just cause I’m a Disabled person does not gives Him no right do this to Me or to anyone else, As He has no damn right ask to such a thing… As He isn’t GOD. Piss on Him…

  2. I am never watching another Schwarzenegger file ever.  Boycott the Arnold.  (And I love those horrid films….)

  3. This so called “anti-fraud” effort was rammed through directly by the Gov. last year during the final budget talks. Those who oppose the huge expense of this unnecessary and disgusting program need to get this program entirely canceled during this year’s budget talks.

  4. Resign or be Impeached Arnold! And let the LG or the AG be Governor, You don’t qualify and You’ve worn out Yer welcome here, If You leave California Arnold, Don’t bother coming back. :angry:

  5. Calitics, can you guys find the time to do some checking on the political connections of the company that makes the cameras?  Morpho Trak is owned by Sagem Morpho, some of whose principals are listed here…


    and I’ll just point out that Arnold has a history of paying off contributors by making bad public policy that favors them.  Stewart Resnick would be an example of a big contributor who got a contract worth far more than the contribution (in fact he’s an example of a number of things, but let’s not go there right now!).  This story smells like one of those.  If you could go into the records, it could well yield something interesting.  Thanks for your work!

Comments are closed.